View clinical trials related to Abscess.
Filter by:Objective: the aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with the development of pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA) in adult liver recipients (ALR) and to describe the experience of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (HIBA) in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of these patients. Background: adult liver recipients differ from the general population with PLA as they exhibit: reconstructed biliary anatomy, recurrent hospitalizations, regular performance status and are subjected to immunosuppression. However, the scientific evidence regarding PLA developed in transplanted organs is still scarce and the management of this disease continues to be based on experience in non-transplanted patients. Methods: between 1996 and 2016, 879 adult patients underwent liver transplantation (LT) at our institution. Patients who developed PLA after LT (cases) and controls are matched according to the time from transplant to abscess in a 1 to 5 relation. The investigators performed a logistic regression model to establish PLA risk factors considering clusters for matched cases and controls. Independent risk factors will be identified using multivariate regression analysis.
The PeriAPPAC trial is a prospective randomised study comparing interval laparoscopic appendectomy with follow-up MRI in patients with initially successfully treated periappendicular abscess. Periappendicular abscess is generally initially treated conservatively with antibiotic therapy and if necessary, drainage. Operative treatment in the acute abscess phase is associated with increased morbidity and thus complicated appendicitis with a periappendicular abscess is initially treated conservatively. However, there is debate on whether interval appendectomy is required. After initial successful conservative treatment of a CT- or MRI-diagnosed periappendicular abscess, patients enrolled in the PeriAPPAC study are randomised either to interval appendectomy or to follow-up with MRI at two months after the initial treatment. All patients also undergo a colonoscopy, appendectomy patients prior to surgery and MRI patients after the MRI (outpatient visit at endoscopy unit with information on the MRI). The primary endpoint is the treatment success in both treatment arms. In the interval appendectomy evaluated as possible morbidity related to appendectomy and in the follow-up treatment arm as possible recurrence of the appendicitis and/or abscess during a one-year follow-up. The PeriAPPAC study is a multi centre trial and the participating hospitals are Turku University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital and Seinäjoki Central Hospital.
The purpose of this European, multicentric, prospective, non-interventional study is to document and evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of severely infected patients with intravenously administered fosfomycin, including patients with osteomyelitis, complicated urinary tract infection, nosocomial lower respiratory tract infection, bacterial meningitis/central nervous system infection, bacteraemia/sepsis, skin and soft tissue infection, endocarditis or other infections, each as far as covered by the respective nationally relevant SmPC.
The main objective of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority of oral flucloxacillin alone compared with a combination of oral flucloxacillin and phenoxymethylpenicillin for the emergency department directed outpatient treatment of cellulitis, wound infections and abscesses, recently renamed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Half of the trial participants will receive flucloxacillin and placebo in combination, and the remaining half will be treated will flucloxacillin and phenoxymethylpenicillin. In a secondary objective the trial aims to measure adherence and persistence of trial patients with outpatient antibiotic therapy. In addition a within-trial evaluation of the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the use of oral flucloxacillin compared with combination therapy from the perspective of the health-care payer (direct costs) the patient and government. Finally the study will externally validate the Extremity Soft Tissue Infection-score, a Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaire designed to quantify the impact of cellulitis, wound infections and abscesses on patient HRQL in clinical trials.
The goal of this study is to examine patients undergoing incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses to determine if routine packing of the abscess cavity affects the need for further interventions such as repeat incision and drainage, antibiotic administration or hospital admission.
Patients who are diagnosed with acute appendicitis consented and then randomized into two arms of the trial. In one arm, patients receive irrigation of the abdomen during surgery with normal saline, or salt water. In the other arm, patients receive irrigation of the abdomen during surgery with sterile water. Sometimes patients receive no irrigation if none is determined to be needed at the time of operation by the surgeon. We then followed patients after surgery for 30 days. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of sterile water as irrigation fluid during surgery in patients who have acute appendicitis will decrease the chance of a post-operative abscess or infection.
This will be a randomized control trial. All patients for whom an emergency provider determines that abscess drainage or laceration repair are necessary will be considered for enrollment. The provider must be willing to participate in the study and be certified to use Nitrous oxide. The investigators providers completed a training course to be certified to use Nitrous oxide. The patient must be age 18 or greater, consent to participate in the study, and be able to complete a satisfaction survey. If the patient states there is a possibility of pregnancy, the investigators will regress to our standard of care and perform a urine pregnancy test. Patients with a first trimester pregnancy will be excluded. Patients who agree to enroll in the study will be randomized to Nitrous oxide versus oxygen (to be administered through the same system), and will complete a survey after the procedure, as will the provider. There will be a separate block randomization for each procedure. Providers may select other agents of choice for analgesia/sedation, such as local anesthesia, and pain medications, based on their clinical judgment. If the patient appears to have inadequate analgesia during the procedure, the provider can elect to treat as is typically done (pain medications or local anesthetics) at their discretion. The survey will ask patients to give a self-reported pain score before and during their procedure (both to be completed after the procedure). It will also ask the patient/guardian and provider for a satisfaction level with the analgesia during the procedure. In addition, side effects and procedure start and stop time will also be documented. In addition to the survey, the investigators will document clinical characteristics including diagnosis, size of laceration or abscess, additional medications required and dosages, comorbidities, age, and gender. Other data that will be gathered will include which adjunctive analgesics/anesthetics were used.
In the Emergency Department (ED), patients frequently seek medical treatment for cutaneous abscesses. Traditional incision and drainage (I&D), with or without packing of cutaneous abscesses has long been the accepted standard of care. This procedure is often very painful for the patient. Additionally, compliance with wound care and follow-up can present barriers to proper care and healing. Research has suggested that incision and loop drainage of an abscess may be another effective treatment for simple cutaneous abscess. Thus far, research into this procedure has been limited to the pediatric population with small sample sizes. In these previous studies, this technique was found to be an effective and less painful treatment for abscesses. Research has not been done in the adult population using this procedure. If this procedure is found to be as effective and less painful in the adult population, then it should be considered as a potential preferred I&D method for cutaneous abscess in the ED.
Infections due to S. aureus are a major healthcare burden. Currently there is not an effective way to prevent S. aureus infection. Treatment failure can happen in up to 20% of patients with SSTI and mean additional cost per patient can be over $1500. Antibiotics are often prescribed for the treatment of CA-S. aureus SSTI. Current IDSA CA-MRSA guidelines suggest that incision and drainage alone may be adequate for management of uncomplicated CA-S. aureus skin abscesses and there is uncertainty about the need of antibiotics. It is not known whether antibiotics are helpful in decreasing S. aureus colonization rates or preventing future S. aureus infections. Though resolution of acute abscess after drainage may be unchanged by antibiotic administration, the impact of managing S. aureus abscess without antibiotics on ongoing S. aureus colonization and recurrent infection requires further study. This study seeks to examine whether the management of initial S. aureus abscesses with incision and drainage in addition to antibiotic therapy is an effective means of preventing recurrent infection. The prolonged longitudinal follow-up of this study is another unique characteristic that will enable the investigators to capture data about recurrences of infections.
The aims of the study are: 1. Explore the bacteriology of para- and retropharyngeal abscess. 2. Validate the bacterial findings by exploring antibody development against F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum and S. pyogenes. 3. Compare bacteriologic findings in concomitant peritonsillar and parapharyngeal abscesses. 4. Characterize patients with para- and retropharyngeal abscess. 5. Compare the concentration of amylase in para- and retropharyngeal abscesses and neck abscesses without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands. 6. Perform gene-sequencing of F. Necrophorum strains, and compare these with strains recovered from patients with acute tonsillitis, peritonsillar abscess, and Lemierre´s syndrome.