Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06397898 |
Other study ID # |
N21.091 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
April 30, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Maxima Medical Center |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects approximately one in four women and imposes
considerable social, emotional, physical and economic burdens. Despite various treatment
options available, endometrial ablation (Novasure) has emerged as a promising solution, with
documented efficacy and high patient satisfaction rates. In the context of peri- and
postoperative pain, research has reported that patients experienced less pain during the
Novasure endometrial ablation procedure in comparison with two other systems. Moreover,
postoperative pain rates were lower in patients treated with Novasure compared to another
endometrial ablation device (ThermaChoice system).
Nonetheless, it remains unclear how patients in detail experience the Novasure treatment. It
is not clear which factors contribute to either a positive or a negative experience.
Moreover, it is unknown if women wish more education before the procedure in order to feel
well prepared for the procedure and possible post-procedural symptoms. Therefore, we want to
investigate how women with heavy menstrual bleeding experience education about endometrial
ablation (Novasure) treatment, the procedure itself and short-term care after treatment.
In this randomized-controlled pilot study, the aim is :
1. To determine if educational videos that show experiences from women with HMB that were
treated with Novasure endometrial ablation affect preoperative anxiety.
2. To assess if educational videos have an effect on preoperative need for information
3. To explore Novasure pre-, peri- and postoperative patient experiences
4. To define positive and negative factors related to Novasure endometrial ablation
5. To gain insight in factors that could improve patient satisfaction before, during and
after Novasure endometrial ablation and to evaluate the educational videos.
Description:
Procedure:
Subjects will be recruited from the outpatient clinic from Máxima Medical Center Eindhoven
and Veldhoven. Patients presenting with heavy menstrual bleeding and scheduled for
endometrial ablation (Novasure) between March 2022 and April 2024 were approached for study
participation either by email, phone call, or in-person during their clinic visit. Upon
expressing interest, patients will be provided with detailed information about the study and
asked to sign an informed consent form. Patients were randomized in an alternating order and
1:1 ratio.
Subsequently, after randomization, the participants will be sent a secure email containing
the link to the educational videos. Patients will watch the educational videos 1-7 days
before their Novasure treatment.On the day of treatment, before undergoing the Novasure
procedure, patients will complete the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) and Amsterdam
Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).
Two days post-treatment, the participants will receive a questionnaire via email through
Research Manager. This questionnaire will encompass inquiries regarding demographics, patient
characteristics, treatment-related positive and negative factors, improvement of care, and
patient satisfaction.
Two groups will complete the questionnaires: one group that viewed an educational video
before Novasure treatment and a control group that did not view the video. Both groups
receive the same treatment (Novasure), with the only difference being the addition of the
educational video as part of pre-procedural preparation, as both groups receive information
from the gynecologist about the procedure. Additionally, patients have access to further
information online or in brochures. Therefore, conducting this study raises no ethical
concerns.
The researchers conducted a power calculation using G*Power 3 to determine the sample size
for the questionnaire research. Based on this calculation, considering a pilot study and
prior research suggesting a minimum of 12 patients per group, the aim was to include 16
patients per group (total 32 patients).
Data will be analyzed by an intention-to-treat analysis. Frequencies and percentages for
general characteristics will be determined. The mean plus standard deviation of VAS-A, APAIS
anxiety and need to obtain information scores, and other scale variables will be calculated.
Mann-Whitney U tests will be used to assess group differences for VAS-A, APAIS, and scale
variables. A p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Descriptive statistics will
be used to compute frequencies and corresponding percentages for nominal and ordinal
variables.