View clinical trials related to Abdominal Pain.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of trimebutine and probiotics in treating Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders (FAPD) in a pediatric population. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is trimebutine effective in reducing the symptoms of FAPD in children? Are probiotics effective in reducing the symptoms of FAPD in children? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (trimebutine/probiotics, probiotics/placebo, or trimebutine/placebo). Undergo measurements for pain and other relevant metrics at the start of the study, after 4 weeks, and after 8 weeks. Researchers will compare the trimebutine/probiotics group to the probiotics/placebo and the trimebutine/placebo groups to see if there are significant differences in the efficacy of these treatments in reducing symptoms of FAPD in children.
This is a double-blind, crossover food challenge study using pork with and without α-gal in patients with a clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI)- α-gal allergy, and to investigate the pathophysiology underlying their symptoms.
To evalute the efficiency and safety of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients who have unexplained abdominal pain after completing all needed imaging and laboratories in general surgery depatment Assuit university hospital
Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects. The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of air versus carbon dioxide gas insufflation for endoscopy in children. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: •to determine safety of CO2 Assess patient comfort (abdominal pain, flatulence and bloating) with CO2 use when compared to air.
This is a prospective cohort study of outpatient adults with chronic abdominal wall pain receiving abdominal wall injections, as part of their usual care, with lidocaine. Subjects will be recruited at the outpatient gastroenterology clinic at OHSU.
The goal of this observational, cross-sectional, prospective study is to compare the quality of the image obtained on the upper abdomen organs with a low-field 0.4 T MRI system with the one obtained with a high-field 1.5 T MRI system, taken as a comparator and reference device. The study is conducted on 40 consecutive adults, not vulnerable, patients who are already scheduled for diagnostic imaging examinations on the upper abdominal organs with the reference device.
Examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach and duodenum) involves passing a flexible tubular endoscope through the mouth into the stomach. It is commonly performed to identify the cause of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea and anaemia. As it is an invasive and uncomfortable test, it is usually performed under general anaesthetic in children. However, children and their parents worry about the nature of the procedure which does incur a small risk of both the anaesthetic and the endoscopy. A capsule endoscope is a large pill-sized device containing a battery powered camera which can be swallowed. It was first devised to examine the small bowel (which begins with the duodenum and ends in the colon or large bowel) which is difficult to reach with conventional endoscopes and has been used in children aged over eight years since at least 2005. It is extremely well tolerated. However, it does not provide a comprehensive view of the whole surface area of the stomach which has a convoluted shape, large volume and is collapsed in the fasted state. Recent research in adults shows that a capsule can be steered around a water-filled stomach using two joysticks to control the polarity and distance of an external robot magnet from the patient. This is much better tolerated and appears to be almost as good a diagnostic tool as conventional endoscopy. It has yet to be studied in children. We intend to compare patient acceptability of capsule endoscopy and gastroscopy and see if it is cost effective.
A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study assessing the impact of health and wellness products on gastrointestinal (GI) health and other health outcomes
Upper abdominal pain (UAP) is a common symptom and frequently the reason to visit the hospital. The prevalence of epigastric pain in the Dutch population is estimated to be as high as 37%. Moreover, Dutch hospitals yearly record >100.000 diagnoses related to UAP. In most patients, UAP can be attributed to symptomatic (functional) dyspepsia (FD), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) or uncomplicated gallstone disease (cholecystolithiasis), with a prevalence in the general population of 20-30%, 20%, and 6-9%, respectively. However, these conditions may have overlapping symptom patterns and generally affect similar populations. which contributes to ineffective (diagnostic) interventions. Patients are generally not aware of the similarity of symptoms and the poor outcome of some treatments. Education positively influences patients' self-management and health judgment. In a recent open-label, multicentre trial the effectiveness of web-based patients' education is applied to reduce overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in patients with dyspepsia. This study illustrated that an web-based education tool safely reduced 40% in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. Lifestyle interventions (such as change of diet and/or physical activity) are widely incorporated in treatment programs for cardio-vascular diseases including diabetes mellitus and obesity. An web-based education tool on upper abdominal pain and other complaints combined with a lifestyle interventions for patients may be an effective treatment option for this large group of patients. This study investigates the potential of an individualized web-based education tool as intervention for patients with functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis with the possibility to visit the Prevention and Lifestyle clinic (RELIEF pathway). The RELIEF pathway aims to reduce unnecessary health care utilization and, secondly, to maintain and improve quality of life by educating patients on lifestyle improvement.