View clinical trials related to Wound Infection.
Filter by:This study will determine the tissue penetration of the novel tetracycline antibiotic, omadacycline (Nuzyra, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), into the extracellular, interstitial fluid of soft tissue in diabetic patients with lower limb wound infections. Penetration will be compared with a group of healthy volunteer control participants.
A surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after surgery in the part of the body
Background. The Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program in Catalonia (VINCat) monitors SSI in elective colorectal surgery since 2007 in 56 hospitals (7.5 million population). These hospitals perform active and prospective standardized surveillance of elective colorectal resections. Post-discharge surveillance is mandatory up to 30 days after surgery. Between 2007 and 2015, the SSI rate did not change significantly, with a cumulated incidence of 5,491 SSI in a total of 29,006 interventions (19%). In 2015, a working group of VINCat specialists and surgeons from the Catalan Society of Surgery was set up to formulate a specific bundle of SSI preventative measures for colorectal surgery. Aim. To analyse the effect of a specific bundle for SSI prevention in elective colorectal surgery. Methods. In 2016, a bundle of six preventative measures was recommended to the VINCat hospitals. Bundle measures were: systemic and oral antibiotic prophylaxis, mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), laparoscopic surgery, maintenance of normothermia, and the use of a double-ring wound retractor. The results of SSI before and after the implementation of the bundle are compared. The results are analysed using the chi-square test (statistical significance p <0.05).
This study evaluates whether specialist negative pressure dressings reduce the risk of wound infections after operations when compared to conservative dressings, and if one negative pressure dressings works better than another. The study will look at patients who have had an open operation on their bowel and the wound closed at the end of the operation.
Introduction: Although negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is likely advantageous for wound healing, the efficacy and safety of its prophylactic use remain unclear. We performed a Randomized Control Trial to assess the usefulness of postoperative NPWT in reduction of postoperative wound healing complications and surgical site infections after diverting ileostomy closure, in the group of patients previously operated for colorectal resection due to cancer. Materials & Methods: Prospective, randomized study will be conducted. Patients with past history of colorectal cancer laparoscopic surgery with protective loop ileostomy scheduled to undergo ileostomy closure with primary wound closure will be randomly divided into groups with or without NPWT. The primary endpoint are incidence of wound related complications (WRC) (wound healing complications witch required surgical intervention other than suture removal or dressing changing). The secondary endpoints are incidences of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) and length of complete wound healing (CWH). Cost analysis will also be performed. In first step of this study between January 2016 and December 2018 we will asses the usefulness of one of the NPWT devices (NANOVA KCI) in prevention of WHC in established group. The second part of the study will be performed in 2 centers between January 2019 and December 2021. In this step we want to compere other NPWT devices in the same application and to confirm single center outcomes .
Setting: Translacional Surgery Graduation Program - Universidade Federal de São Paulo and Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio - Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí. Background: Breast reduction is one of the most performed plastic surgery procedures. Antibiotics are widely prescribed, on an empirical basis, to prevent surgical site infections. However, there is a lack of evidence to support its use. Objective: To compare the influence of the use of prophylatic antibiotics as a single dose or for 24 hours on surgical site infection rates following reduction mammaplasty. Methods: Randomized trial of non-inferiority, with two parallel groups, double blinded. A total of 146 breast hypertrophy patients, with reduction mammaplasty already scheduled, will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly allocated to group A, that will receive antibiotics only at the anesthesia induction (n=73), or to group B, that will receive antibiotics at the anesthesia induction and for 24 hours (n=73). None of the patients will receive antibiotics after hospital discharge. Patients will be followed-up weekly, for 30 days, regarding surgical site infection. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria will be applied. A statistical analysis of the data will be performed.
The overarching aim of this research project is to prevent orthopedic implant-associated infections. This study aims to investigate if photodynamic therapy has an effect on bacterial skin colonization and decrease number of colonizing bacteria associated with sebaceous and sweat glands in order to improve skin antisepsis strategies for the prevention of surgical site infections.
Wound infections are a frequent complication in abdominal surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the antiseptic solution 0.04 % polyhexanide (serasept) may reduce occurrence of postoperative wound infections compared to NaCL (saline) solution in a prospective randomized setting.
This is a 64-patient, 90-day, open -label study on adult patients undergoing below knee amputation for various etiologies. The objective of this study is to assess surgical wound healing and wound bioburden using combination treatment of Next Science SurgX™ Antimicrobial Wound Gel and BlastX™ Antimicrobial Wound Gels as compared to standard of care.
Background During anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, many patients experience low blood pressure. There have been many studies showing that patients who experience low blood pressure during anaesthesia are at increased risk of sustaining kidney or heart damage, strokes, having a post-operative infection, or dying. During anaesthesia, in most cases blood pressure is monitored using a cuff which inflates on the arm (the 'normal' way blood pressure is measured in a GP practice or hospital ward). This gives a reading each time the cuff goes up and down, every 3-5 minutes typically. There is a less well used way to measure blood pressure, using an additional cuff on the finger which gives a constant, continuous measure of blood pressure. We think that using this monitor, rather than the 'standard' monitor, will mean that low blood pressure is recognised more quickly, therefore treated more quickly, and will lead to patients having less exposure to dangerously low blood pressures. If this is the case, we hope that it will reduce how often patients experience kidney or heart damage, have an infection after surgery, suffer a stroke, and reduce the risk of death. Methodology To test this, we would need to run a large clinical trial comparing the continuous monitor to the standard monitor. This would be expensive and involve a great deal of work in a large number of hospitals, and so first we wish to determine whether the trial we would like to run is practical, and possible to deliver in the real world. To do this we plan to run the trial first on a small-scale feasibility (pilot) study, where we will recruit 30 patients, half of whom will have the standard monitor, and half of whom will have the continuous monitor. We will see what proportion of the patients who could enter the trial actually do so and complete it, and use it as an opportunity to iron out problems with the trial. If we find it is possible to run the trial on a small scale, we will apply for funding to run a full study. This will aim to answer the question of whether the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes which were agreed during development with the patient public involvement group locally; rate of kidney damage, heart damage, stroke, post-operative infections, risk of death, and hospital length-of-stay. Expected outcomes and implications. We anticipate we will find the trial to be feasible with amendments to the way it is run, and if this is the case, we will apply to run the full scale trial. If this shows that using the continuous monitor improves the patient outcomes above, then it would represent new, significant evidence that may lead to the NHS adopting it's use as 'standard care' during anaesthesia for repair of a broken hip, and would like lead to similar trials in other operations where patients may benefit in a similar way.