Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05739058
Other study ID # Violet-Blue-Light-Inactivation
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 22, 2023
Est. completion date May 1, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Bispebjerg Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This four-week prospective clinical investigation will assess the safety and feasibility of a medical device without CE-marking. The medical device is a light-emitting-diode (LED) and is manufactured by VulCur MedTech Aps. Violet-blue light treatment is tested on a total of twenty-two patients with chronic wounds, divided into three groups, each group only receiving one dosage. Three dosages (low, medium and high) of violet-blue light treatment is tested. ID 1-7 are assigned to the low group, ID 8-15 are assigned to medium group and ID 16-22 are assigned to the high dosage group.


Description:

This is as prospective safety and feasibility clinical trial investigating violet-blue light treatment on chronic wounds. This clinical trial runs from Q3 2022 - Q2 2023. Twenty-two patients with chronic wounds will be included (n = 22) for a study-period of four weeks. Week 1 includes one baseline visit. Through Week 2,3 and 4 treatment is given six times with a span of 24-72 hours between every treatment visit. Week 4 includes one follow up-visit. Patients entering the study are assigned to three light dosage groups (low, medium and high) according to their study ID. ID 1-7 are assigned to the low group, ID 8-15 are assigned to medium group and ID 16-22 are assigned to the high dosage group. Between each dosage of light, there will be an evaluation of primary and secondary endpoints by the sponsor and the principal investigator. Light dosage is only escalated should this evaluation be deemed safe. To determine treatment safety skin reactions are assessed after treatment at: 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 5th treatment visit and at follow-up. Adverse Events and Adverse Device Events are evaluated at every visit for every dosage, feasibility is evaluated at follow-up for both patient and investigator. This investigation complies with the Good Clinical Practice concerning medical devices and follows the ISO standard DS/EN 14 155 and the Declaration of Helsinki


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 22
Est. completion date May 1, 2024
Est. primary completion date May 1, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Men, women and non-binaries fulfilling all inclusion criteria - Age >18 - Patients with a chronic wound defined > 6 weeks - Wound Area > 1 cm and < 25 cm - Patient can understand Danish - Patient can comply with protocol - Patient is fully informed about the study and has given informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Clinical infection in the wound requiring systemic or local antibiotics - Current intake of antibiotics or locally applied (within 7 days before baseline) - Known or suspected cancer in the wound - Previous Photodermatitis and/or Photosensitivity - Previous Porphyria and/or hypersensitivity to porphyrins - Known congenital or acquired immunodeficiency - Newly adjusted or newly started systemic immunomodulate treatment >4 weeks - Treatment with haemodialysis - Dementia - Participating in other clinical wound healing studies in the last 30 days - Judgement by the investigator that the patient is not suited for study participation - Pregnant or breastfeeding women. (All fertile women who is not on safe contraception will need a negative pregnancy test performed at baseline. Safe contraception includes cobber and hormone Intra Uterine Device and Hormone anticonception drugs. Sterility is defined as have had surgical sterilisation and being postmenopausal)

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Violet-Blue Light Treatment / FlashHeal Device
FlashHeal illuminates an area of 10 cm in diameter, located at 6-7 cm distance of the wound. Wounds larger than 10 cm in diameter, will receive enough treatments to cover the wound bed. To obtain full coverage the circular treatment area is relocated to cover the remaining wound field. The wavelength is 405 nm, Full Width Half Maximum at (FWHM) 400-415 nm. Device irradiances are adjusted to the total fluences required for the Low, Medium and High group, the treatment will last 15 minutes at all dosages. Light is emitted with 1000 Hz.

Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Danish Wound Healing Center, Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen Northwest

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Bispebjerg Hospital Hvidovre University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (9)

Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Jensen PO, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, Hoiby N, Givskov M. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x. — View Citation

Dai T, Gupta A, Huang YY, Yin R, Murray CK, Vrahas MS, Sherwood ME, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR. Blue light rescues mice from potentially fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn infection: efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Mar;57(3):1238-45. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01652-12. Epub 2012 Dec 21. — View Citation

Enwemeka CS. Antimicrobial blue light: an emerging alternative to antibiotics. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Nov;31(11):509-11. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.9871. Epub 2013 Oct 18. No abstract available. — View Citation

Leanse LG, Dos Anjos C, Mushtaq S, Dai T. Antimicrobial blue light: A 'Magic Bullet' for the 21st century and beyond? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022 Jan;180:114057. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114057. Epub 2021 Nov 18. — View Citation

Liebmann J, Born M, Kolb-Bachofen V. Blue-light irradiation regulates proliferation and differentiation in human skin cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Jan;130(1):259-69. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.194. — View Citation

Malone M, Bjarnsholt T, McBain AJ, James GA, Stoodley P, Leaper D, Tachi M, Schultz G, Swanson T, Wolcott RD. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20. — View Citation

Plattfaut I, Demir E, Fuchs PC, Schiefer JL, Sturmer EK, Bruning AKE, Oplander C. Characterization of Blue Light Treatment for Infected Wounds: Antibacterial Efficacy of 420, 455, and 480 nm Light-Emitting Diode Arrays Against Common Skin Pathogens Versus Blue Light-Induced Skin Cell Toxicity. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 May;39(5):339-348. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4932. — View Citation

Tomb RM, White TA, Coia JE, Anderson JG, MacGregor SJ, Maclean M. Review of the Comparative Susceptibility of Microbial Species to Photoinactivation Using 380-480 nm Violet-Blue Light. Photochem Photobiol. 2018 May;94(3):445-458. doi: 10.1111/php.12883. Epub 2018 Mar 31. — View Citation

Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Murray CK, Hamblin MR, Hooper DC, Dai T. Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of pathogenic microbes: State of the art. Drug Resist Updat. 2017 Nov;33-35:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) adjusted to the skin. The violet-blue light treatment will be considered safe when less than 30 % have an overall CTCAE score larger than Grade 2 CTCAE. The overall CTCAE score for each patient is based on the one CTCAE score with the most severe grading. 4 weeks
Secondary Baseline Clinical Wound Assessment Evaluates wound symptoms (Exudate, necrosis, maceration, granulation, Oedema,) and skin symptoms (eczema, Erythema, Hyperpigmentation, Hypopogmentation, epthilializing) at a 4 step scale from none to mild, moderate, severe. Baseline, 1 week
Secondary Clinical Wound Assessment Evaluates wound symptoms (Exudate, necrosis, maceration, granulation, Oedema,) and skin symptoms (eczema, Erythema, Hyperpigmentation, Hypopogmentation, epthilializing) at a 4 step scale from none to mild, moderate, severe. Pre-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Follow up Clinical Wound Assessment Evaluates wound symptoms (Exudate, necrosis, maceration, granulation, Oedema,) and skin symptoms (eczema, Erythema, Hyperpigmentation, Hypopogmentation, epthilializing) at a 4 step scale from none to mild, moderate, severe. Follow Up, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Numeric Rating Scale (1-10) Pain scale in relation to treatment. Higher scores indicate more pain. Post-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Wong Baker FACES (1-10) Visual Pain scale in relation to treatment. Higher scores indicate more pain. Post-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Investigator Questionnaire Usability of the medical device is tested with the system usability Scale (SUS) testing 10 items on a 5 step scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. 4 weeks
Secondary Patient Questionnaire Evaluating Participant perceived; pain, time consumption and satisfaction through 20 items.
Question 1-13 can be answered on a 5 step scale from "to a very high degree" till "not at all", including possibility to answer "dont know" and "not relevant".
Item 14-20 can be answered with "Yes", "No" and "Dont Know".
4 weeks
Secondary Mean time of visit Total time for the visit will be measured in minutes. For every visit, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Mean time of Treatment Procedure For every treatment visit, time used for the treatment with the FlashHeal Device is measured.
Time is measured in minutes.
Post-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Baseline Mean Bacterial Load E-Swabs, Essen Rotary Technique performed at baseline, follow-up and before and after treatment with FlashHeal Device. Bacteria will be cultured for aerobe and anaerobe species. 1 week
Secondary Pre-intervention Mean Bacterial Load E-Swabs, Essen Rotary Technique performed at baseline, follow-up and before and after treatment with FlashHeal Device. Bacteria will be cultured for aerobe and anaerobe species. Pre-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Post-intervention Mean Bacterial Load E-Swabs, Essen Rotary Technique performed at baseline, follow-up and before and after treatment with FlashHeal Device. Bacteria will be cultured for aerobe and anaerobe species. Post-intervention, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Mean Bacterial Load at Follow Up E-Swabs, Essen Rotary Technique performed at baseline, follow-up and before and after treatment with FlashHeal Device. Bacteria will be cultured for aerobe and anaerobe species. Follow up, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Baseline Wound Fluid Swab for wound fluid performed once every week using the Essen Rotary Technique, testing for 6-10 cytokines assessing the inflammatory microenvironment. Baseline, 1 Week
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Fluid Composition Week 1 to Week 2 Swab for wound fluid performed once every week using the Essen Rotary Technique, testing for 6-10 cytokines assessing the inflammatory microenvironment. 2 Weeks
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Fluid Composition Week 1 to Week 3 Swab for wound fluid performed once every week using the Essen Rotary Technique, testing for 6-10 cytokines assessing the inflammatory microenvironment. 3 Weeks
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Fluid Composition Week 1 to Week 4 Swab for wound fluid performed once every week using the Essen Rotary Technique, testing for 6-10 cytokines assessing the inflammatory microenvironment. 4 weeks
Secondary Baseline Wound Size Week 1 Clinical Photography is performed once every week. Hereafter the wound is analysed with the ImageJ software to calculate wound size in cm2. Baseline, week 1
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Size Week 1 to Week 2 Clinical Photography is performed once every week. Hereafter the wound is analysed with the ImageJ software to calculate wound size in cm2. 2 Weeks
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Size Week 1 to Week 3 Clinical Photography is performed once every week. Hereafter the wound is analysed with the ImageJ software to calculate wound size in cm2. 3 Weeks
Secondary Change from Baseline Wound Size Week 1 to Week 4 Clinical Photography is performed once every week. Hereafter the wound is analysed with the ImageJ software to calculate wound size in cm2. Follow Up, 4 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE). The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin. Post-intervention, 2 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE). The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin. 30 minutes Post-intervention, 2 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE). The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin. 24 hours Post-intervention, 2 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE). The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin. 48 hours Post-intervention, 2 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE).
The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin.
120 hours Post-intervention, 2 weeks
Secondary Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE) Safety is measured as the absence of Adverse Events (AE) skin reactions. Adverse event skin reactions are assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events U.S Department of Health and Human Services version 5.0, Nov 27, 2017 (CTCAE).
The CTCAE is adjusted to the skin.
Follow Up, 4 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05023135 - DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
Recruiting NCT03459547 - Soft Peri-implant Tissue Around Different Abutment Materials N/A
Recruiting NCT05608187 - Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03649308 - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Skin Grafting N/A
Recruiting NCT04596124 - Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus Cream and Gauze vs Connettivina Bio Plus Cream and Gauze N/A
Completed NCT03285542 - Prospective Randomized Trial of Dermabond Prineo in Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT05474911 - PILONIDAL SINUS: CONVENTIONAL CARE VERSUS NEGATIVE PRESSURE THERAPY. N/A
Recruiting NCT05689775 - Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection With Robot-assisted Harvest of VRAM Flap
Recruiting NCT04849143 - The Effectiveness of Stingless Bee Honey (Kelulut Honey) Versus Gel in Diabetic Wound Bed Preparation N/A
Completed NCT03596112 - The Difference in Wound Size Reduction Comparing Two Frequently Used Wound Dressings in Everyday Care N/A
Recruiting NCT05169814 - Micro/Nanobubbles (MNBs) for Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04545476 - Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities N/A
Completed NCT06020157 - Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05133570 - Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment With Vista Care®, in Arterial Ulcers of the Lower Extremities
Recruiting NCT04901325 - Baricitinib in the Treatment of Adults With Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT03668665 - Influencing Wound Healing Through the Application of Hyaluronic Acid With Perfluorodecalin and Physalis Angulata Extract After Split Skin Removal From the Thigh - A Study in "Split Wound Design" Phase 3
Completed NCT03703479 - Effect of A-PRF After Removal of Wisdom Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT03204851 - Microlyte Dressing in the Management of Wounds N/A
Recruiting NCT06117436 - Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05618912 - Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment N/A