View clinical trials related to Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.
Filter by:This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of talazoparib in combination with radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients with gynecologic cancers that have come back after previous treatment (recurrent). Talazoparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Giving talazoparib in combination with radiation therapy may work better in treating patients with gynecologic cancers.
This is prospective cohort study. All the patients with primary cervical cancer in the future three years in Peking Union Medical College Hospital will be included in this study. Before and after the major therapy (including at least radical hysterectomy and/or radiotherapy), the patients accept (1) the questionnaires survey about quality of life; (2) urodynamic testing; (3) rectum dynamics testing and (4) ovarian reserve function. The survival outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) will be supplemented as secondary objectives.
This cohort study is to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Sixty patients with LACC (FIGO 2009 stage IB2 to IIB) will be enrolled. After informed consents, they would accept the imaging evaluation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). After excluding cases of distant metastasis, they will accept two cycles of NAC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2, on day 1, once for three weeks). Then a second MRI is performed to evaluate the imaging response. For patients achieving objective response, radical hysterectomy (RH, via laparoscopy or laparotomy) and an evaluation of pathologic response are performed. For patients without objective imaging response, the choice of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radical hysterectomy will be discussed. After RH, adjuvant therapy will be given according to the RH pathologic results. The primary objectives consist of (1) the objective imaging response after NAC; (2) the objective pathologic response after RH. The secondary objectives consist of (1) disease-free survival and overall survival after various therapy modalities; (2) severe adverse effects of NAC; (3) the effects of NAC on the surgical outcomes.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the testing of DNA methylation, high-risk HPV subtypes, and cytology with the definite histological results in a case-control study, so as to determine the accuracy of DNA methylation in the screening of uterine cervical lesions. This study will include 300 patients with definite histological results, with 100 of cervical inflammation or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 100 of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and 100 of uterine cervical cancer. All the cervical specimens of cytology collected in the clinical settings will be utilized for the testing of DNA methylation, high-risk HPV subtypes and thin prep liquid-based cytology test (TCT). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated based on the known histological results. The differences of DNA methylation with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and TCT will also be analyzed. The testing of DNA methylation will be performed with the methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The TCT and HPV testing will be performed with the Roche kits.
This study is to investigate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes in patients with conization for uterine cervical lesions from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The primary objectives consist of following: 1. The cumulative incidences of precancerous lesions and cancers of lower genital tract in patients who accepted conization for high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL), carcinoma in situ and stage IA1 cancer (FIGO 2009) 2. The cumulative pregnancy rates in patients sparing the fertility The secondary objectives consist of following: 1. The effects of surgical protocols (modified Sturmdorf method and "8" figure suture) and energy equipment (cold knife and monopolar electrical cautery) on the oncologic and obstetric outcomes, and on the histological components. 2. A full description of histological components of the conization specimens 3. The cytological and virus outcomes after conization, based on the thin prep liquid-based cytology test (TCT) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing
The primary objective of this study is to compare the testing of DNA methylation, high-risk HPV subtypes, and cytology with the definite histological results for uterine cervical lesions in a prospective cohort study. This study will include 300 unselected patients with definite histological results. All the cervical specimens of cytology collected in the clinical settings will be utilized for the testing of DNA methylation, high-risk HPV subtypes and thin prep liquid-based cytology test (TCT). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated based on the known histological results. The differences of DNA methylation with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and TCT will also be analyzed. The testing of DNA methylation will be performed with the methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The TCT and HPV testing will be performed with the Roche kits.
SUCCOR study tries to understand the outcomes of European patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009)1, that underwent a radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in 2013-2014 within the ESGO area (European Society of Gynecologic Oncology)
This trial is a translational, open-label, multicentric, prospective cohort study of 900 patients aiming to describe the PD-1 (programmed death) expression in T cells (T lymphocytes) in different solid tumors. The study will be conducted on a population of patients with local and/or metastatic malignant solid tumor and who are followed within a standard of care procedure or clinical trial. Patients with any of the following tumor types may be enrolled in the trial: - Head and neck cancer, - Ovarian cancer, - Cervical cancer, - Pre-invasive CIN III cervical cancer (Cervical Intra-epithelial Neoplasia III cervical cancer), - Other solid tumor types (including glioblastoma, NSCLC (Non-small cell lung cancer), anal cancer) Each tumor type will be considered as an independent cohort. For each included patient, biological specimen (tumor sample, blood samples and ascites samples if applicable) will be collected. Study participation of each patient will be 5 years.
To investigate the value of prophylactic extended-field irradiation (EFI), we conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of pelvic irradiation and prophylactic EFI in selected patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. External beam radiation therapy is delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Cervical cancer is the most common cause of death from gynecological cancer world-wide. With technological innovation, minimally invasive or even non-invasive medical treatment has become a trend. Since the first cases of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer have been reported in 1992, many single-center observational cohort studies have shown that compared to open abdominal surgery ，minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy) showed advantages of less blood loss, shorter hospital stay and fewer intraoperative complications, while the 5-year survival and disease-free survival were similar. The NCCN guidelines and ESGO recommendations also clearly indicated that patients with FIGO stage IA2 -IIA cervical cancer could undergo open or laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy. However, in October 2018, the results of two studies published in the《New England Journal of Medicine》have subverted our traditional perception of minimally invasive surgery and caused widespread controversy in the field of gynecologic oncology treatment. Both studies showed that the survival rate in the minimally invasive surgery group was lower than that in the open surgery group. The results of these two studies have brought unprecedented doubts and challenges to the minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer. The MD Anderson Cancer Center has even stopped minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer. Several hospitals in Hong Kong have responded similarly. The NCCN guidelines are also quickly updated based on the results of those studies: patients should be informed of the results of this study and doctors should respect the patient's choices. The above research results have also attracted the attention of many gynecological oncologists in the mainland China. Some experts questioned the design of this study design as well as surgical skills. We need to look at these findings cautiously. So, we launched a real-world study of clinical outcomes affected by different surgical treatment for patients of early stage cervical cancer. We plan to recruit 2000 patients with early cervical cancer from 20-30 selected surgical centers nationwide and perform surgery on patients with qualified and experienced doctors.We will inform the patients current status of the study in detail, divide the patients into different observational group according to their choices on surgical methods. The patients will be followed up closely after surgery. We will compare the differences in clinical outcomes between the two surgical methods and conduct subgroup and stratified analysis. We hope that this study can truly reflect the actual status and clinical l level of early cervical cancer treatment in China, and provide a high level of clinical evidence for the treatment of cervical cancer in China .