View clinical trials related to Urothelial Cancer.
Filter by:Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, NSCLC, HCC (Child Pugh Class A only), MSI-High solid tumors, Urothelial Cancer, GE junction/Gastric Adenocarcinoma, or HNSCC for which current standard of care treatment for their stage of disease would be with Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab monotherapy, who meet eligibility criteria will undergo a biopsy (core or excisional/incisional; FNA not adequate) for baseline tissue. Patients will then be randomized to one of 3 arms: Anti-PD-1 mAb plus Metformin 500mg po BID, Anti-PD-1 mAb alone, Anti-PD-1 mAb plus Rosiglitazone 4mg po qdaily. Five weeks (+/- 7 days) after initiation of therapy a patient will undergo a repeat biopsy (core or excisional/incisional; FNA not adequate) for correlative analysis. The patient will then continue on study therapy for up to 2 years, or until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs first. RECIST 1.1 with modifications, to allow for continued therapy until progressive disease is confirmed if the patient is clinically stable, will be used in the trial.
This study will investigate the safety and tolerability of ADP-A2M4CD8 T-cell therapy in subjects who have the appropriate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and MAGE-A4 tumor antigen. Tumor indications include endometrial, esophageal, esophagogastric junction (EGJ), gastric, head and neck, melanoma, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), ovarian or urothelial cancer.
This is a dose escalation, MTD expansion (Phase 1b) and cohort expansions (Phase 2) study to assess the safety and tolerability of a combination of NAP with durvalumab in subjects with selected advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
The purpose of this non-interventional study is to identify participants with urothelial cancer (UC) and selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) aberrations through molecular testing of their archival tumor tissue.
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the safety of GEN1029 (HexaBody®-DR5/DR5) in a mixed population of patients with specified solid tumors
The purpose of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer treated with enfortumab vedotin (EV) to the OS of participants treated with chemotherapy. This study compared progression-free survival on study therapy (PFS1); the overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V1.1 of participants treated with EV to participants treated with chemotherapy. In addition, this study evaluated the duration of response (DOR) per RECIST V1.1 of EV and chemotherapy and assessed the safety and tolerability of EV, as well as, the quality of life (QOL) and Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) parameters.
This is a Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avelumab in combination with axitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least one prior platinum containing therapy, and in treatment naïve patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, who are ineligible for cisplatin containing chemotherapy for their advanced disease.
Cabozantinib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Its primary targets are Hepatocyte growth factor receptor protein (MET), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3 (VEGFR1-3), RET, AXL, FLT3 and KIT. Cabozantinib has been approved by the FDA for clinical treatment of progressive, metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. Recently published trials have demonstrated activity for cabozantinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Furthermore, in preclinical models of urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder, cabozantinib has demonstrated the ability to inhibit tumor xenograft growth. It has been suggested that levels of soluble Met ectodomain (sMet) can be measured in the urine as a useful biomarker to monitor the efficacy of c-Met therapy in bladder cancer patients. Moreover, cabozantinib has demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated, advanced bladder cancer patients, with a response rate of 19.5% and manageable toxicities. In the phase I of this study it is proposed to evaluate DLTs of niraparib and cabozantinib combination and determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with advanced urothelial or renal cell carcinoma. In the phase II it is proposed to make a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of this combination in patients with urothelial cell carcinoma. Efficacy results will be correlated with genomic alterations related to c-Met and Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitor activity.
The main objective is to demonstrate that the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy with durvalumab, to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (with cisplatin/gemcitabine) and surgery in urothelial carcinoma could improve event-free survival.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of erdafitinib versus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in participants with advanced urothelial cancer harboring selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) aberrations who have progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-programmed death ligand 1(PD-[L]1) agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2).