View clinical trials related to Umbilical Hernia.
Filter by:Umbilical hernia repair is one of the most common surgical performance in general surgery. Up to now, the use of suture repair has been the preferred technique for small umbilical hernia defects without any gold standard procedure. Mesh have been reserved to larger umbilical hernia defects. However, there is an increasing evidence that mesh reinforcement could be advantageous to lower the high recurrence rates also in smaller umbilical hernias. A remained important question is in what anatomical position the mesh should be placed. The investigators hypothesize that the use of an onlay mesh in small umbilical hernia defects can reduces recurrence rates without increasing postoperative complications compared to a suture repair.
Ventral hernias can be repaired using a variety of techniques, with smaller defects often being amenable to minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. For many years, the standard of care MIS approach to ventral hernias has been the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) approach, in which a large piece of mesh is placed inside of the abdomen and fixed to the inner abdominal wall using a combination of sutures and/or mechanical tacks. For selected patients, the IPOM approach has demonstrated benefits over open repair, including decreased postoperative length of stay and decreased incidence of surgical site infection. However, concern regarding long-term outcomes of placing mesh inside the abdomen have spurred the search for alternate approaches to MIS ventral hernia repair. This includes the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach, in which the retromuscular plane is accessed and developed so a large piece of mesh may be implanted outside of the abdominal cavity. The theoretical benefits of this approach are that patients may experience reduced pain because mechanical mesh fixation is not required (as compared to traditional IPOM approaches in which mesh is fixed to the inner abdominal wall) and that mesh is kept outside of the abdominal cavity and away from the viscera, allowing use of less expensive, uncoated mesh and theoretically reducing risk for long-term mesh related complications. While popularity of eTEP has grown, literature published regarding this approach has been mostly retrospective, consists of relatively small series of patients, and suffers from selection bias. For the one prospective study of eTEP published by Radu, et al, there was no comparator arm. The investigators will conduct a registry-based randomized controlled trial comparing MIS approaches for repair of small to medium-sized ventral hernias, specifically eTEP versus IPOM. This will occur through the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). Our hypotheses are multiple: 1) Patients with ventral hernias undergoing eTEP will experience a 30% decrease in pain scores by postoperative day 1 compared to patients undergoing IPOM; 2) eTEP will be associated with higher median direct costs per case versus IPOM; 3) eTEP will be associated with equivalent 1-year hernia recurrence rates versus IPOM; 4) eTEP will be associated with significantly increased intraoperative surgeon workload compared to IPOM.
The purpose of this study is to determine the exact position of a mesh which is placed in underlay position in umbilical hernia in vitro. The investigators want to gain information if the mesh lays directly next to the abdominal wall fascia or if there´s fat tissue between mesh and fascia. Furthermore they hope to get some information about the tissue incorporation.
Compare the ability of the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) to provide surgical anesthesia for overweight and obese patients undergoing umbilical hernia surgery.
This study analyse the need for neuromuscular blockade in consecutive routine laparoscopic procedures without standard use of neuromuscular blockade in an ambulatory laparoscopic surgery setting and analyse specific reasons for using neuromuscular blockade in individual patients. Furthermore, the study report the analgesic use in postoperative care unit and the discharge rate.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a Transabdominal Plane Block will decrease patient pain and pain medication use after a laparoscopic ventral (ventral, umbilical, incisional) hernia repair with mesh.
Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are common and performed by numerous surgical techniques. Considering that the hernia repairs in general are relatively small and simple procedures there are disproportionate poor results. The aim of present study is to determine surgical risk factors for readmission after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair and to report risk factors for later reoperation for recurrence.
The purpose of our study to quantitatively examine the stress levels prior to surgery and the use of analgesics post surgery in both children and their parents following a preoperative intervention with a medical clown compared to children that were not exposed to this intervention.
background Operation for small umbilical hernias is one of the most common surgical procedures, but the best surgical technique, including the choice of suture or mesh remains unknown. It is well known that using non-absorbable sutures in closure of the abdomen, diminishes the risk of incisional hernias and wound healing problems.It has also been found that the use of resorbable suture in fixation of the mesh in Lichtesteins procedure leads to greater risk of recurrence of the hernia. Furthermore, it has been stated in smaller studies, that the use of the mesh in open operation for a small umbilical hernia has lower risk of recurrence (approx. 1-3%) than sutured repair (10-12 %). However, the scientific literature is deficient, with few patients. The purpose of this study is to describe reoperation rate of recurrence after small umbilical hernias, depending on choice of sutures in both regular repair and in mesh repair. Hypothesis: sutured repair with non-absorbable suture has lower recurrence rates than with other types of sutures, whereas mesh repair has even lower recurrence rates in small umbilical hernia repairs.
Meshes-devices using dual-sided mesh technology have been developed for the specific indication of small ventral hernias. The design of these meshes allows introduction of a mesh of appropriate size to cover the hernia defect, through a small incision. This technique is very attractive for the surgeon and the patients because the mesh usually can be introduced through a nearly invisible scar in the umbilicus. The avoidance of fixation sutures omits the pain related to these sutures. Short-term results and patient satisfaction are very favorable, encouraging the surgeons to continue with the technique, although long-term results of these meshes in good quality studies are lacking.