Clinical Trials Logo

Ulcer clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ulcer.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00563394 Completed - Clinical trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

MSI-78 Topical Cream vs. Oral Ofloxacin in the Treatment of Infected Diabetic Ulcers

Start date: August 1994
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

224 adults with diabetic foot ulcers will be randomized to either magainin peptide (MSI-78) or ofloxacin (FLOXIN, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Corporation) an oral fluoroquinolone antibiotic.

NCT ID: NCT00558662 Completed - Venous Ulcer Clinical Trials

Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to Compare the Efficacy of Coban 2 Versus SSB in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Start date: November 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study purpose is to compare healing rates, cost effectiveness, quality of life and safety of 12 week compression therapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers with the 3M™ Coban™ 2 Layer Compression System versus short-stretch compression bandage.

NCT ID: NCT00548574 Completed - Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of SPD476 (Mesalazine) 2.4g and 4.8g Once Daily, With Reference to Asacol 0.8g Three Times Daily in Subjects With Acute, Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis

Start date: December 4, 2003
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of subjects in remission after 8 weeks of treatment with SPD476, 2.4 g/day once daily vs placebo and SPD476 4.8 g/day once daily versus placebo

NCT ID: NCT00545389 Completed - Colitis, Ulcerative Clinical Trials

Phase II Dose-Ranging Study in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis Treated With SPD476

Start date: February 10, 2003
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Evaluate the percentage of subjects in remission at the end of an 8-week treatment period for three dose groups (SPD476 1.2 g/day, 2.4 g/day or 4.8 g/day, administered once daily).

NCT ID: NCT00543868 Completed - Duodenal Ulcer Clinical Trials

MK0782 + Low-Dose Aspirin 7-Day Erosion Endoscopy Study (0782-001)

Start date: June 2004
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study will determine how if MK0782 is safe and tolerable and to determine how often and the severity of stomach and small intestine ulcers develop following administration of MK0782 plus enteric coated aspirin, rofecoxib 25mg plus enteric coated aspirin, naproxen 500 mg puls enteric coated asprin vs placebo. This is an early phase trial and some specific protocol information is in progress and not publicly available at this time. (Full information is available to trial participants).

NCT ID: NCT00542789 Completed - Clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Comparative Efficacy & Safety Study of Esomeprazole Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers With NSAID

Start date: August 2007
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of esomeprazole (D961H) 20 mg versus placebo once daily for up to 24 weeks of treatment involving patients with a history of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers receiving daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy by evaluating presence or absence of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers throughout the treatment period (24 weeks) in terms of efficacy on prevention of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers

NCT ID: NCT00542152 Completed - Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Trials

Study Comparing Cyclosporine With Infliximab in Steroid-refractory Severe Attacks of Ulcerative Colitis

CYSIF
Start date: June 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

PHASE: IV TYPE OF STUDY: With direct benefit. DESCRIPTIVE: Multicenter, randomized, open label study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of cyclosporine with infliximab in steroid- refractory attacks of ulcerative colitis. STUDY TREATMENTS:Cyclosporine 2mg/kg/day intravenous(IV)for 7days then Neoral 4mg/kg/day orally for 3 months. Infliximab 5mg/kg at Weeks 0, 2 and 6. NUMBER OF PATIENTS: 50 patients in each group i.e. a total of 100 patients. INCLUSION PERIOD: 24 months. STUDY DURATION: 27 months. MAIN EVALUATION CRITERIA: Clinical response at D7 according to the Lichtiger Index score AND Clinical Remission at D98 according to the Mayo Disease Activity Index score SECONDARY EVALUATION CRITERIA: Clinical remission at D98 (according to the Mayo Disease Activity Index score) Endoscopic response Colectomy rate Tolerance

NCT ID: NCT00536744 Completed - Clinical trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Effectiveness of dermaPACE™ Device and Standard Treatment Compared to Standard Treatment Alone for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Start date: October 2007
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the dermaPACE Device to sham application, when administered in conjunction with standard treatments used in the treatment of DFUs.

NCT ID: NCT00534443 Completed - Peptic Ulcer Clinical Trials

Importance of Cytokines in Peptic Ulcer Disease: Implications for Treatment

Start date: February 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Although all PPIs are effective, there are some differences in their clinical performance, particularly in terms of the degree and speed of gastric acid suppression. Few data are also available about their effect of the pathophysiological mechanisms of gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. Aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of therapy with esomeprazole or rabeprazole on the mechanism of pathogenesis of gastritis and particularly on the pattern of release of pro- and anti- inflammatory cytokines associated to peptic ulcerative process by the gastric mucosa.

NCT ID: NCT00527787 Completed - Gastric Ulcer Clinical Trials

Evaluating PN 400 (VIMOVO) in Reducing Gastric Ulcers Compared to Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drug (NSAID) Naproxen

Start date: September 2007
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study uses a randomized, double-blind, controlled design to demonstrate that PN400 (esomeprazole and naproxen) is more effective in reducing the occurrence of gastroduodenal ulcers, dyspepsia, and heartburn in subjects at risk for developing NSAID-associated gastric ulcers compared to naproxen alone.