View clinical trials related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of omarigliptin 25 mg weekly (as monotherapy) compared with sitagliptin 50 mg daily and placebo, and the long term safety (up to 52 weeks) of omarigliptin 25 mg weekly. The primary hypotheses are that after 24 weeks: 1) Omarigliptin 25 mg weekly provides a greater reduction from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared with placebo, and 2) The mean change from baseline in HbA1c in participants treated with omarigliptin 25 mg weekly is non-inferior compared with that in participants treated with sitagliptin 50 mg daily.
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and tolerability of sitagliptin 100 mg/simvastatin 40 mg FDC (MK-0431D) in Vietnamese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control on metformin.
Primary Objective: -To demonstrate the efficacy of a fixed combination of glimepiride + metformin in terms of HbA1c reduction, during 24-week treatment period in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Secondary Objective: To assess the effects of the fixed combination of glimepiride and metformin at week 24 on: - Percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <7% - Percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <6.5%. - Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) - Safety and tolerability
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of JTT-851 on diabetes as well as to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of JTT-851 in type 2 diabetic patients either treated with metformin or treatment-naïve.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate or severe chronic renal insufficiency or end stage renal disease on dialysis with inadequate glycemic control. The primary hypothesis of the study is that omarigliptin compared to placebo produces greater reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) after 24 weeks.
This study will examine the safety and efficacy of the addition of omarigliptin in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have inadequate glycemic control on diet/exercise therapy and oral antihyperglycemic agent monotherapy.
Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of a new formulation of insulin glargine and Lantus in terms of change of HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (scheduled at month 6 [week 26]) in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Secondary Objectives: To compare a new formulation of insulin glargine and Lantus in terms of change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), preinjection plasma glucose, 8-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile. To compare a new formulation of insulin glargine and Lantus in terms of occurrence of hypoglycemia
The purpose of this research study is to understand the effects of testosterone and estrogen on the body's response to the hormone insulin.
This study compares the medical and psychological effects of telemonitoring plus intensified self-management support to those of usual care alone for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). If this intervention proves effective without increasing costs or clinician burden, then its implementation could yield major public health benefits, especially for vulnerable and underserved DM patients, and broader societal benefit may occur through increased helping behavior and strengthened social ties.
This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of omarigliptin (MK-3102) compared with the sulfonylurea, glimepiride, in Type 2 diabetes mellitus participants with inadequate glycemic control on metformin monotherapy. The primay hypothesis of the study is that after 54 weeks, the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1C (A1C) in participants treated with omarigliptin is non-inferior compared with that in participants treated with glimepiride.