View clinical trials related to Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a Phase I/IIa, multicenter, open-label, consecutive cohorts, dose-escalation study of BT-001 with repeated IT administrations alone and in combination with IV infusions of pembrolizumab.
The primary objective of this study is to compare progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer randomised to treatment with standard chemotherapy plus moxifloxacin or placebo.
Open label first-in-human study of TH1902 in solid cancer, with 4 sequential parts: Part 1 (dose escalation): patients with recurrent advanced solid tumors (all comers) that have relapsed or are refractory to standard chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, and for which no known effective therapies exist. Part 2 (expansion): selected patient populations with recurrent advanced TNBC, HR+ breast cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, cutaneous melanoma, thyroid cancer, SCLC, prostate cancer and other cancers known to express SORT1 that are refractory to standard therapy. Part 3 (optimization): patients diagnosed with histologically or cytologically confirmed high grade serous ovarian cancer, including high grade peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer, or high grade endometrioid cancer, that is refractory or resistant to standard therapies, should not be considered platinum sensitive, and where current therapy is not considered to be providing benefit. Part 4 (basket expansion): selected cancer type diagnosed with histologically or cytologically confirmed cancers, where TH1902 has been studied and/or showed activity (in Parts 1 to 3), that is refractory or resistant to standard therapies, and where current therapy is not considered to be providing benefit.
This is an open-label, multicenter, first in human, Phase 1a/1b study of PY314 in subjects with locally advanced (unresectable) and/or metastatic solid tumors that are refractory or relapsed to standard of care (including pembrolizumab, if approved for that indication).
This is a Phase II study designed to assess efficacy and safety of talazoparib, high dose radiation, and atezolizumab in patients with metastatic TNBC that is PD-L1 positive. A total of 23 gBRCA pathogenic variant negative patients will be enrolled. All patients will be treated with induction talazoparib of 1mg PO daily starting Day 1. Patients will then receive 8 Gy x 3 fractions to 2-4 metastatic lesions beginning Day 12,13, or 14 and given QOD. 840 mg of atezolizumab will be given intravenously (IV) on Day 15 of the 1st cycle and then on Day 1 and Day 15 of the remaining cycles. The sequence of administration is not specified on the days in which talazoparib and atezolizumab are given on the same day. Each cycle equals 28 days. Treatment will continue until progression or severe toxicity. A safety lead in of up to 6 patients will be performed. Immune-related and non-immune related adverse events will be tracked up to 12 weeks post initiation of atezolizumab, as the majority of treatment-related toxicities from talazoparib, radiation, and atezolizumab occur within this time period.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether adding pembrolizumab, with or without olaparib, to standard radiation therapy is a safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer, , and to see whether the study treatment is better than, the same as, or worse than the usual approach (radiation therapy alone).
A two arm pilot study investigating the rate of pathologic complete response in patients with vitamin D deficiency and triple negative breast cancer undergoing standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy + vitamin D supplementation, including an observational arm to describe response in patients who are not deficient. Investigators hypothesize that vitamin D supplementation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable triple negative breast cancer patients with vitamin D deficiency, will increase the rate of pathologic complete response chain reaction to that of vitamin D sufficient patients based on historical controls.
The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Camrelizumab Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel and Epirubicin as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety as well as the most effective dose of the alpha-lactalbumin vaccine (aLA breast cancer vaccine) to treat patients with non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer, participants who are of cancer-free but may be at risk for triple-negative breast cancer, and for participants who are receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab following initial triple negative breast cancer treatment.
It has been established that chronic stress can take a toll on one's health. Furthermore, when an someone falls ill, it is believed that the way that they handle stress and/or adversity can positively or negatively impact the course of their disease. Against the background of these findings, this study aims to explore how (1) cumulative lifetime stress exposure, (2) coping response, (3) perceived social support, and (4) and overall psychological well-being may relate to the oncological outcomes of women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients treated for TNBC between 01.01.2015-31.12.2019 at the University Clinic for Gynecology at Pius-Hospital Oldenburg will be asked to complete four questionnaires corresponding to the abovementioned psychological aspects. The results of these questionnaires will be analyzed together with the clinical patient data and tumor characteristics (such as type, size, etc.) to explore whether there is a tendency between one or more of the above-mentioned psychosocial aspects and the course of the disease (e.g. a disease recurrence within one year after the initial diagnosis (yes / no), the duration of the disease-free or progression-free period). As there is an existing body of evidence supporting a relationship between stress and the immune system, we expect to see the poorest oncological outcomes in patients who 1) have faced more stressful/adverse life events, 2) those who present inadequate/inappropriate coping skills, 3) report less social support, and 4) poorer overall psychological well-being. If a potential connection between psychosocial factors and the course of the TNBC is identified, further disease specific, it will aid in the development of disease-specific, health-promoting measures to better support this particular patient group. This is of great importance, as TNBC is generally associated with clinically aggressive behavior and a worse prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes.