View clinical trials related to Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:Background: Despite improvements in the treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), the cancer returns in half of the women and shockingly 40% are dead within 5 years of their initial cancer diagnosis. There is an urgent need to identify reliable biomarkers of response for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Study Aims: To update Concr's existing predictive algorithms specifically for use in women newly diagnosed with TNBC. The plan is develop technology which will predict which drug the cancer will respond best to, treatment A vs. treatment B AND how the individual's prognosis could change if treatment A is chosen overtreatment B. Study Design: The VISION study is a clinical study looking back in time (retrospective study), specifically focusing on women who were previously diagnosed with early Triple Negative breast cancer and received chemotherapy followed by curative breast surgery. The plan is to collect historical clinical data and previously collected cancer biopsy samples from up to 200 women in order to update Concr's existing treatment prediction algorithms. Hence there are no extra research biopsies needed in order to participate in the Study. Study Sites: UK and Australia Study Funding: This study is funded by the a Techbio company called Concr with support from Innovate UK (UK Government funding).
This is a phase II, single-centered, open-label, single-armed study in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer that will evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) rate of a non-anthracycline-based chemo-immunotherapy regimen. The trial includes a lead-in cycle of pembrolizumab, then a combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant setting.
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different adjuvant intensification regimens in early-stage BRCA1/2 mutant triple-negative breast cancer.
This study will look at the efficacy and safety of QL1706 plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and carboplatin in a neoadjuvant setting, in high-risk, TNBC early breast cancer.
Studies have indicated that the improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) is significantly correlated with triple-negative breast cancer（TNBC）patients' overall survival (OS). Patients with TNBC have poor efficacy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy has been demonstrated to enhance the pCR rate of TNBC patients, increasing it from 45% to approximately 60%. Therefore, how to further improve the pCR rate of luminal-type breast cancer became the main objective of this study. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) not only kills tumor cells directly, but also kills the distant unirradiated tumor cells by promoting the cross-initiation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect. Our research team has recently discovered that the triple therapy model of SBRT + anti-vascular targeting + anti-PD-1 was safe and efficacious in lung cancer patients. Ivonescimab (AK112) is an anti-PD-1/VEGF-A bispecific antibody. In order to improve the pCR, a single-arm, open, phase II clinical study was proposed to explore the safety and efficacy of SBRT+AK112+chemotherapy, a neoadjuvant treatment modality, in the treatment of TNBC.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY4170156, is safe, tolerable and effective in participants with advanced solid tumors. The study is conducted in two parts - phase Ia (dose-escalation, dose-optimization) and phase Ib (dose-expansion). The study will last up to approximately 4 years.
This is an open-label, Phase 1/2 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of APL-5125 for the treatment of selected locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with particular focus on Colorectal carcinoma (CRC).
TILs have been shown to be predictive for response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC in multiple studies (Level-1B evidence for clinical validity as per REMARK criteria). TNBC patients with excellent survival outcome and low incidence of metastasis can be identified using a manual TIL score. Furthermore, a fully end-to-end blinded evaluation of the same algorithm to be used in this study achieved >90% accuracy for predicting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the pooled analysis of seven adjuvant phase-III TNBC trials.
This is a randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT; MK-2870) in combination with pembrolizumab compared to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in participants with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received neoadjuvant therapy and did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery. The primary objective is to compare sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab to TPC (pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus capecitabine) with respect to invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) per investigator assessment. It is hypothesized that sac-TMT plus pembrolizumab is superior to TPC with respect to iDFS per investigator assessment.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LM108 plus toripalimab plusnab-paclitaxel or eribulin as first-line or post-line treatment in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.