Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04972786 |
Other study ID # |
20-623 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
June 30, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
University of New Mexico |
Contact |
Jeremy Hogeveen, PhD |
Phone |
505-277-7505 |
Email |
jhogeveen[@]unm.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
21 healthy control participants will be recruited. On Day 1 they will complete reward-guided
decision making tasks and questionnaires followed by a functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI) scan. On Days 2 and 3 they will receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
(rTMS) targeting a specific part of the brain called the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex
(dACC) or sham stimulation, and will then repeat a subset of the same decision making tasks
and fMRI sequences. If brain stimulation modifies decision making and dACC activity, it could
represent a novel way of treating patients with neural circuit deficits that impede motivated
behavior. Of particular relevance to the current trial, this rTMS study will run in parallel
with a study of apathy (i.e., diminished motivation) in patients with traumatic brain injury
(TBI), with the goal of eventually leading to a patient-centered trial of rTMS treatment for
this disruptive neuropsychiatric symptom.
Description:
TBI is a common and impairing acquired neurological disorder caused by a concussive event to
the head. Psychiatric disorders associated with impaired decision making-in particular:
apathy, or diminished motivated behavior-are common post-injury in TBI. Despite the critical
importance of diagnosing and characterizing psychiatric problems such as apathy in TBI, very
little is known about the neuropathologies underlying apathy in this patient group.
Reinforcement learning (RL)-i.e. the process of learning the reward value of stimuli and
actions-represents a fundamental cross-species construct underlying motivated decision
making. Further, aberrant reward processing has been strongly implicated in symptoms of
apathy in the field of computational psychiatry. Despite extensive evidence that brain
injuries can lead to maladaptive motivated decision making, the specific RL aberrations that
might underlie this phenomenon, and their association with psychiatric sequelae remain
unclear. Therefore, extant work has failed to provide insight into the computational
mechanisms underlying maladaptive decision making in patients with TBI, and such work will be
critical to build a better understanding of the neuropathologies that underlie apathy in TBI.
This gap in current knowledge is being targeted by a related study from which healthy
controls will be recruited for the current rTMS trial.
However, even if we gain a better understanding of the RL neural mechanisms that cause
aberrant motivated behavior and psychiatric sequelae in TBI, translating this into an
actionable target for clinical intervention remains unclear. Psychological interventions
including Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Motivational Interviewing (MI) have been
investigated for treating symptoms of TBI. However, the potential benefit of both CBT and MI
is limited in TBI, as they both rely heavily on high-level cognitive abilities-e.g. selective
attention, executive control, and metacognition/insight-that are commonly impaired in this
population. In addition to psychotherapies, two categories of pharmacotherapy have been
investigated to reduce psychiatric sequelae in TBI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIs) and dopamine agonists. A randomized controlled trial of SSRIs for TBI failed to
demonstrate reductions in patient neuropsychiatric symptoms after a 10-week intervention.
Multiple pilot studies (Ns=10-11) of dopamine agonists for TBI have been conducted,
demonstrating preliminary support that they may reduce apathy. Yet, a recent meta-analysis
suggested a high degree of unreliability in the literature on dopamine agonism in TBI.
Dopamine agonists also carry the risk of significant side effects including increased apathy
or maladaptive impulsivity. Unreliability and maladaptive side effects of dopaminergic
medications are likely driven by their lack of circuit-specificity: They modulate
dopaminergic tone throughout the brain, rather than within a dedicated neural circuit
underlying a specific symptom profile. Therefore, a more effective approach to treating
apathy in TBI may involve both i) avoiding therapies that rely on high-level cognition, and
ii) establishing circuit-specific approaches for ameliorating patient apathy. Precise
fMRI-guided rTMS represents one possible approach. The current project aims to test the
efficacy of fMRI-guided TMS to RL neural circuits anchored in dorsal anterior cingulate
cortex (dACC) on motivated decision making in healthy controls. Ultimately, the hope is that
this approach might represent a first step towards a potential clinical intervention for TBI
patients with clinical apathy.