View clinical trials related to Tooth, Impacted.
Filter by:Canine impaction is a sign of abnormal dental development with potentially far-reaching consequences (such as significant root resorption and loss of lateral incisors. This compromises both aesthetics and function of the teeth, making the prediction of canine tooth impaction increasingly important. Interceptive orthodontic measures, such as extraction of deciduous canines or molars or maxillary expansion aim to create extra space in the dental arch, allowing the canines to position themselves better and normalizing their eruption pattern. This study corresponds to the second phase of an RCT, based on the results of the first phase, published in July 2023 (S59030) (Willems G, Butaye C, Raes M, Zong C, Begnoni G, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Early prevention of maxillary canine impaction: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 31;45(4):359-369). The first phase compared the effect of 3 interceptive strategies (expansion, extraction and no intervention) on the position of impacted maxillary canines, finding that maxillary expansion provides the most improvement on impacted canine position. In second phase, 8-year-old patients without posterior crossbite and lack of space in the dental arch are randomized to treatment with 'slow maxillary expansion with removable plates' or 'no treatment'. These groups are additionally compared with patients with a crossbite and lack of space, which always receive expansion treatment. All selected patients will be followed up for at least 18 months. The primary endpoint is to investigate the effect of maxillary expansion with removable plates on the position of maxillary canines prone to impaction during early mixed dentition, assessed on panoramic X-rays. The secondary endpoint is the assessment of the need for additional orthodontic treatment.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the hypothesis that there are none difference in the treatment result of orthognathic surgery on the lower jaw, with interoperative wisdom tooth removal rather than preoperative wisdom tooth removal. In patients with severe dental malocclusion combined with a dentofacial deformity. The main question it aims to answer are: • Is there a difference in the degree of complication and the patient's perception, with inter-operative wisdom tooth removal rather than pre-operative wisdom tooth removal. Participants will be will be divided into two groups, with one group having their wisdom teeth removed 6 months before their jaw moving surgery and the other group having their wisdom teeth removed in connection with their jaw moving surgery.
The objective is to compare the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters of patients with an impacted third molar. Patients will be analyzed according to their skeletal characteristics: skeletal class (sagittal direction) and facial skeletal typology (vertical direction). The inclusion characteristics of third molars will also be analyzed, to see the links between typology and inclusion. The principal hypothesis is no significant difference in third molar inclusion patterns in relation to skeletal divergence.
The investigators aim to investigate if the additional information available from a 3D scan of the wisdom tooth can reduce the risk of nerve injury during wisdom tooth surgery compared to conventional 2D images. Wisdom tooth surgery is a common surgical procedures that a significant proportion of the population will undergo. As with any other surgical procedure, there are potential complications, of which, injury to the nerve supplying feeling to the lip, chin, and tongue is the most significant. This can lead to persistent pain, tingling, or numbness that may impact a patient's ability to eat and function. The risk of nerve injury during wisdom tooth surgery is assessed using X-ray images, which show the position of the nerve and tooth in the jawbone. 2D and 3D scans are used, which have their own advantages and disadvantages such as reduced cost and radiation dose with 2D or more information from 3D images, but it remains unclear which is better at reducing the risk of nerve injuries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DIT112 in adolescents and adults with acute pain after dental surgery for the extraction of impacted third molars.
A clinical study will be conducted to verify the reliability of the root form classification of impacted lower third molars that was put by Abu-Mostafa N (2023) The root forms of partially or fully impacted lower third molars will be classified pre-operatively based on panoramic radiograph, then clinically after extraction, and the identified root classifications will be compared.
A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the erbium laser with the wavelength of 2.94 µm and traditional instruments in the extraction of the impacted lower third molars will be performed. Clinical, radiological and biochemical findings will be assessed after extraction of the impacted lower third molars.
Project summary The surgical removal of mandibular third molar is one of the most common procedures done in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Patients often experience pain, swelling, trismus, dehiscence, alveolar osteitis, infection, nerve injury and periodontal tissue damage after third molar surgery. Flap design is an important step in third molar surgery.The aim of this study is to compare the triangular and envelope flap designs in lower third molar surgery in terms of postoperative sequelae including pain ,trismus,swelling,incidence of dry socket and also operative time taken.The study also aims to find out does the level of impacted mandibular third molar and number of roots has effect on postoperative outcomes in surgical removal of mandibular third molar.The study design used will be a double-blind randomized clinical study. Patients who fit the inclusion criteria will be included as research subjects.Sample will be divided into two groups randomly. In one group the envelope flap will be raised during surgical removal of the lower third molar while in the other triangular flap will be used. Investigators will also divide the third molars into level 1,level 2,level 3 based on the relationship between the tip of mesial cusp of impacted third molar and the distal surface of crown of adjacent second molar based on orthopantomograph findings.Level 1 will be when the tip of mesial cusp of third molar is within the occlusal third of crown of second molar,level 2 will be when the tip of mesial cusp of third molar is within the middle third of crown of second molar, level 3 will be when the tip of mesial cusp of third molar is within and below the cervical third of crown of second molar. Another subgroup will be based on the number of roots of the impacted third molar where investigators will divide the third molar into single rooted and multirooted based on orthopantomograph findings. Investigators will also divide the sample based on gender and age group as below 30 years and above 30 years. The primary outcomes to be measured are pain and operative time while secondary outcomes are swelling ,trismus and incidence of dry socket.Outcome assessment will be done by another clinician than surgeon using scientific tools and techniques as mentioned. Surgical procedures and outcomes measurement will be done by separate clinicians to ensure masking.
Lower third molar extraction is one of the most common treatments in oral surgery practice. It is a treatment with inherent complications such as postoperative pain, swelling or trismus. In order to minimize disconfort after extraction, analgesic and anti-inflammatory medication is prescribed. Recently, it is seen that circadian rhythm may play an important role on drugs metabolism, modulating its effect depending on the moment of administration. The aim of the study is to analyze if dosage modification of a Non Steroideal Anti-Inflammatory (dexketoprofen) affects on postoperative pain, swelling and open mouth limitation according the circadian clock
Accuracy of the variables used in Wharfe assessment and Pederson difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The lower 3rd molar tooth is one of the most frequently impacted teeth. Its prevalence ranges from 30.3% to 68.6% worldwide according to a study conducted by Sekhar, 2020. The impaction of a tooth can be defined as a pathological condition in which eruption of tooth is not normal i.e. it is not erupted as expected within a specific time period. The impaction renders the affected tooth as non-functional due to its postural instability/ abnormal position. The normal tooth eruption is dependent on several local as well as systemic factors. Normal eruption can be altered by neighboring tooth, excessive soft tissue in the surrounding, or the dense overlying bone. Race and Ethnicity an also affect/ alter the impaction rate. The removal of 3rd mandibular molar/ wisdom tooth is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, being done in dental clinics on daily basis. To predict the difficulty level of this procedure for impacted lower 3rd molar, no scoring system/ scale is considered sufficient i.e. every scale takes some factors into account, while missing some factors, so clinically not very much reliable. Some of the proposed scales/ models which are clinically in use are as follows: WHARFE's, Pederson's, Winter's, and Pell and Gregory's model.