Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04033380
Other study ID # NanFangH
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 2, 2019
Est. completion date October 31, 2021

Study information

Verified date July 2019
Source Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Contact Wenjuan Yan, PHD
Phone 15802018770
Email 645613053@qq.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Compare the comfort and durability of Ceramic (VITA,Suprinity ,VS) vs Resin Bloc (VOCO, Grandio Bloc,GB) Endocrown by chairside CAD/CAM system (computer aided design / manufacture).

Objective:To provide information of material selection for the chair-side restoration of the teeth after root canal treatment.


Description:

Pulpal and periapical diseases are the main causes of tooth loss. Root canal treatment (RCT) is the only effective way to treat these diseases. However, failure of RCT is commonly seen without coronal restoration.Endocrown is a new type of onlay with a retainer in the pulp cavity which consists of a cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber.This restoration method is not only good at the preservation of residual tooth tissue, but also suitable for severely damaged molars or premolars after dental pulp treatment.More and more endondontist tend to use this ways because they are a minimally invasive solution in such cases.Endocrown is mainly made of glass-ceramics, which has the advantages of beautiful appearance, high hardness and good biocompatibility. However, ceramic materials are brittle and fracturable, and need to be sintered twice in the manufacturing process, which is relatively complex and time-consuming. Composite resin block material is a new type of composite material developed in recent years. It is used for chairside CAD/CAM restoration,It has beautiful and natural color, and its elastic modulus is close to dentin. Therefore, it is more compatible with natural teeth in performance.Moreover, In the process of making, the steps of secondary sintering and glazing are omitted and shortened. But, there was no sufficient data to verify which material was more effective. The main aim of this trial is to compare the clinical efficacy of ceramic vs resin-based bloc endocrown. Other objectives include looking for the prognostic and influence factors of the related effects.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 200
Est. completion date October 31, 2021
Est. primary completion date May 30, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. The patient is healthy and is 18-75 years old and has molar teeth and tooth root apex without evident damage and no root fracture, as determined by x-ray.

2. The patient has three or four walls of intact tooth tissue after root canal treatment

3. The patient has good oral hygiene.

4. The patient has signed an informed consent form.

5. The patient is not participating in any other clinical trial.

6. The patient has received a class A assessment according to FDI criteria for marginal adaptation after restoration.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Obvious destruction of the apical tissue or presence of large cysts or both

2. Severe periodontitis

3. Oral malignant tumor(s)

4. Undergoing radiotherapy

5. Pregnancy

6. Mental illness or systemic diseases

7. Incapable of self-care

8. Unsuitable for the trial as deemed by the researchers

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Resin blocs (Grandio Blocs, VOCO)
composite-base bloc (Grandio Blocs, VOCO)
Ceramic (Suprinity, VITA)
glass ceramic zirconia enhanced lithium silicate glass ceramics (Suprinity, VITA)

Locations

Country Name City State
China NanFang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (2)

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262. — View Citation

Marquillier T, Doméjean S, Le Clerc J, Chemla F, Gritsch K, Maurin JC, Millet P, Pérard M, Grosgogeat B, Dursun E. The use of FDI criteria in clinical trials on direct dental restorations: A scoping review. J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 18. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Marginal Adaptation FDI criteria for dental restorations assessment(2010) This criteria is composed of three dimensions (biological, functional and esthetic), each consisting of several items that are assessed by clinical and radiographic examination according to Likert scales of 5 terms. Some items are evaluated quantitatively, others visually.The worst score of all items is retained as The overall score of the restoration, thus resulting in a single (ordinal) primary outcome. 2 years
Secondary Fracture of material and retention: Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and 24 months according to FDI criteria by 2 independent evaluators. A: Intact; B: Crack apparent on transillumination; C: Fracture observable; D: Endocrown lost (state at which interface debond occurred). 2 years
Secondary wear Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and 24 months according to FDI criteria by 2 independent evaluators. 2 years
Secondary Recurrence of caries Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and 24 months according to FDI criteria by 2 independent evaluators. 2 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05792215 - KAP of Dental Practitioners Regarding CRA
Not yet recruiting NCT05792800 - Dental Practitioners KAP Regarding Caries Preventive Measures in Cairo and Riyadah
Terminated NCT03871569 - Medico-economical Evaluation on Buccodental Teleexpertise in Nursing Home N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04324008 - Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites N/A
Completed NCT02801552 - Regenerative Endodontic Procedure of Immature Permanent Teeth With Apical Periodontitis Using PRF N/A
Completed NCT06112366 - Comparison of Silk Suture and Tissue Adhesive for Wound Closure After Impacted Tooth N/A
Completed NCT04003493 - LifE Style, Nutrition and Oral Health in Care Givers (LENTO) N/A
Completed NCT03708510 - Clinical Evaluation of Two Low-shrinkage Composites N/A
Completed NCT06067542 - Effects of Chlorhexidine Toothpaste on Wound Healing After Impacted Tooth Extraction N/A
Completed NCT03556553 - Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite in Class I Cavities N/A
Completed NCT04291443 - Proteomics and Orthodontic Root Resorption N/A
Completed NCT03553966 - Hydroxyapatite-toothpaste and Enamel Caries in the Primary Dentition N/A
Recruiting NCT01805869 - Oral Specimen and Data Acquisition Study of Subjects Requiring Third Molar Removal
Completed NCT04385693 - Intentional Pulpotomy to Preserve Hopeless Molars N/A
Completed NCT02429947 - An Analysis of the Symptomatic Domains Most Relevant to Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy (CMT) Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04029324 - Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement N/A
Recruiting NCT06212232 - A New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04827693 - The Cortical Shield for Facial Bone Reconstruction
Completed NCT02868957 - Repetition Improves Precision and Trueness of Digital Intraoral Scans N/A
Completed NCT06280014 - Evaluation of the Effects of Mefenamic Acid and Dexketoprofen on Postoperative Wisdom Dental Surgery N/A