Strip Graft w/ Xenogeneic Matrix vs Free Gingival Graft for the Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa

Surgical Wound Clinical Trial

Official title:

Strip Graft With Xenogeneic Matrix Versus Free Gingival Graft for the Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa: A Randomized Clinical Trial With Vascular Analysis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06261268
• Other study ID #: Strip vs FGG
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 29, 2024
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
• Contact: Mariano Sanz Alonso, DMD
• Phone: 913942021
• Email: marsan[@]ucm.es
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare changes in peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) following the application of apically repositioned flap (ARF) using a combination of a Strip graft and a Xenogeneic matrix, or with a free gingival graft (FGG), in implants in the second stage with <2 mm of PIKM. Additionally, as a secondary objective, the investigators compare postoperative blood supply in both recipient and donor sites based on the type of graft obtained. Meanwhile, the investigators evaluate differences between the two groups concerning microcirculation values (perfusion units, PU), soft tissue thickness (STT), volume change, vestibular depth, as well as clinical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS).

Description:

1. BACKGROUND The importance of keratinized tissue around teeth and dental implants is a frequently investigated topic in the literature. The need for an adequate amount of peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM), which is defined as a minimum width of 2 mm is demonstrated according to a recently published systematic review and consensus report. The standard of care in the PIKM augmentation is the apically repositioned flap (ARF) combined with a free gingival graft (FGG), as it represents a predictable and documented strategy to gain KT width. However, such technique implies the harvest of abundant autogenous grafts, and is frequently associated to sub-optimal aesthetic results due to the poor color mimicry of the grafted tissue. In light of such limitations, some alternatives based on the use of soft tissue substitutes have been proposed, with the aim of reducing surgical invasiveness through the avoidance of large autogenous grafts and improving aesthetic outcomes. Among those, the sole use of as xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM) has been associated with promising clinical outcomes albeit with lesser KT width gains as compared to autogenous FGGs. Recently, a novel approach called the Strip Technique (ST) has been introduced, where the exposed periosteal bed of a ARF is covered with the combination of a xenogeneic collagen matrix and a 2-3 mm wide strip of autogenous free gingival graft, sutured at the apical border of the matrix. The rationale for this "combined grafting technique" stands on reducing surgical invasiveness and improving color mimicry through the use of a XCM, while providing a source of autogenous keratinizing cells in the apical border of the grafted area to promote better PIKM gains. Albeit this new approach seems promising, there is limited evidence regarding its clinical efficacy and there is a lack of knowledge regarding how the adoption of such combined approach affects the re-perfusion of the grafted tissue and the overall microvascular healing of the surgical site. Furthermore, the pattern of the revascularization of both the autologous grafts and the XCM requires further understanding. Most of our recent knowledge comes from classical animal studies that evaluated the microvascularization of FGG when placed over periosteum with microscopy. The postoperative blood supply of these free grafts is of key importance to their survival. Recently a new non-invasive technique has been introduced in the field of medicine and dentistry the Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) system, that provides further understanding on the dynamics of postoperative blood supply of the applied grafts and elucidate regarding the healing pattern of the strip combination technique. 2. JUSTIFICATION There is a lack of knowledge regarding the clinical performance, the healing pattern and the dynamics of revascularization when performing apically repositioned flaps combined with either the autogenous strip-XCM technique or autogenous FGGs. Results from this study could assess whether the strip-XCM technique represents a reliable, less invasive, and simplified alternative to autogenous FGGs for the increase of PIKM. Moreover, it could provide additional knowledge regarding the healing and revascularization pattern of both strip-XCM and FGGs around dental implants, assessed through an innovative technology as Laser Speckle Perfusion.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 48
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 15, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients older than 18 years
• Short-span dental implants in the mandible at second stage with inadequate PIKM (<2 mm) with at least one adjacent tooth mesially
• Periodontally healthy patients with a pristine or reduced periodontium
• Plaque index (FMPS) less than 20%.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Compromised general health status that contraindicates study procedures (=ASA III);
• Drug or alcohol abuse;
• Smoking of > 10 cigarettes per day;
• Chronic use of corticosteroids, NSAIDs or immunomodulators (any type or dose);
• Pregnant or lactating women;
• History of previous mucogingival surgeries in the area of interest

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Healing Surgical Wounds
• Peri-Implantational Loss
• Surgical Wound
• Wounds and Injuries

Intervention

Procedure:
• Strip graft with Mucograft
An apically repositioned flap is made in the vestibular region. The flap is then elevated with a split-thickness preparation, and the mucogingival junction will be repositioned apically and fixed with periosteal-anchored sutures. Then, a free epithelialized gingival strip graft will be harvested from the molar area of the palate. The "Strip" graft is sutured to the apical end of the recipient bed. The remaining uncovered part of the periosteal bed will be covered with a xenogeneic collagen matrix (Mucograft®. Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) fixed with simple interrupted and crossed sutures. The edges of the palatal wound (donor area) will be approximated with crossed sutures.
• Free gingival graft
The preparation of the apically repositioned flap and the recipient bed with its apico-coronal design and dimension is performed as in the test group. Subsequently, an epithelialized free gingival graft with the size of the entire recipient area with a thickness of 2 mm will be harvested from the molar area of the palate. The graft is sutured to the recipient periosteal bed using simple interrupted and crossed sutures. In the donor area, a collagen sponge is sutured to the wound by means of crossed sutures.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Complutense University	Madrid

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (6)

Molnar E, Molnar B, Lohinai Z, Toth Z, Benyo Z, Hricisak L, Windisch P, Vag J. Evaluation of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for the Assessment of Oral Mucosal Blood Flow following Periodontal Plastic Surgery: An Exploratory Study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4042902. doi: 10.1155/2017/4042902. Epub 2017 Jan 23. — View Citation

Montero E, Molina A, Matesanz P, Monje A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Herrera D. Efficacy of soft tissue substitutes, in comparison with autogenous grafts, in surgical procedures aiming to increase the peri-implant keratinized mucosa: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23:32-46. doi: 10.1111/clr.13751. — View Citation

Ramanauskaite A, Schwarz F, Sader R. Influence of width of keratinized tissue on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23:8-31. doi: 10.1111/clr.13766. — View Citation

Sanz M, Schwarz F, Herrera D, McClain P, Figuero E, Molina A, Monje A, Montero E, Pascual A, Ramanauskaite A, Renouard F, Sader R, Schiegnitz E, Urban I, Heitz-Mayfield L. Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: Consensus report of group 1 of the DGI/SEPA/Osteology Workshop. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23:47-55. doi: 10.1111/clr.13956. — View Citation

Solonko M, Regidor E, Ortiz-Vigon A, Montero E, Vilchez B, Sanz M. Efficacy of keratinized mucosal augmentation with a collagen matrix concomitant to the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A dual-center randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):105-119. doi: 10.1111/clr.13870. Epub 2021 Oct 21. — View Citation

Urban IA, Lozada JL, Nagy K, Sanz M. Treatment of severe mucogingival defects with a combination of strip gingival grafts and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):345-53. doi: 10.11607/prd.2287. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in peri-implant keratinized mucosa width (mm)	the apico-coronal linear dimension of the buccal peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) will be measured with a UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA) as the linear dimension of the buccal vestibule, from the buccal peri-implant mucosa margin to the mucogingival junction at the mid-buccal aspect of the treated implant and adjacent mesial tooth.	Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary	Vascularization (in Laser Speckle perfusion units [LSPU])	Vascularization will be measured using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) (PeriCam PSI System; Perimed AB, Sweden). This novel technology represents a validated, non-invasive, real time, chair side mean to provide contrast based bi-dimensional representations of the superficial vascular network of a given tissue surface.	pre-surgically, post-surgically at 4, 7, 10, 14 and 30 days, and at 3-6 and 12 months
Secondary	Changes in soft tissue thickness (STT) (mm)	STT will be measured by ultrasonography with a dental Pirop® ultrasound device (Echoson Company, Poland). The equipment is validated in experimental and clinical studies. Patients will undergo a clinical and ultrasound examination before gingival augmentation, as well as right after the surgery, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after, in order to evaluate STT at two different apico-coronal location. It will be measured at the mid-buccal aspect of the implant. Point 1 will be located 2 mm from the periimplant mucosal margin and point 2 will be considered at the mucogingival junction (MGJ).	Baseline, post-op, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary	Vestibule depth (VD) (mm)	VD will be measured with a UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA) as the linear dimension of the buccal vestibule. At the mid-buccal aspect of the treated implant from the peri-implant soft tissue margin to the greatest concavity of the vestibule crease, retracting the lips with a spandex retractor for intraoral photography	Pre-surgically, and at 30 days, 3-6 and 12 months
Secondary	Probing pocket depth (PPD) (mm)	Probing depth will be measured from the peri-implant mucosal margin to the bottom of the sulcus, at 6 locations per implant, using a UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA), approximating to the nearest 0.5 mm.	pre-surgically, at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Secondary	Dehiscence (mm)	Recession will be measured from the peri-implant mucosal margin to the top of the healing abutment, at 6 locations per implant, using a UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA), approximating to the nearest 0.5 mm.	post-surgically, at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Secondary	Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS)	Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) will be measured using a calibrated UNC15 periodontal probe (UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA). Score will be expressed in percentage (%), it will be calculated by the number of sites where plaque is recorded is divided by the total number of available sites in the mouth and multiplied by 100 to express the bleeding index as a percentage. 6 sites per tooth is recorded.	Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months
Secondary	Volumetric changes	Changes in the peri-implant tissue volume distribution will be analyzed by digital volumetric analysis (DVA), comparing preoperative data with measurements collected at different time points. At each time point, the treated area will be optically scanned with a 3D scanner (Medit i500, Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) and standard tessellation language (STL) will be analyzed with a dedicated software (Smop® Swissmeda Software, Swissmeda AG, Zurich, Switzerland), to superimpose the digital models acquired at the different timepoints. For each overlay, a sagittal section perpendicular to the implant axis in its central part (largest diameter) will be selected. A line coincident with the longitudinal axis of the implant will then be drawn on the cross-sectional images of such section, and an image capture (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) will be exported for horizontal measurements.	Baseline, 14 days, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary	Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS)	Patients' pain and discomfort with respect to the procedure will be assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10 cm, where 0 is the worst and 10 is the best). In addition, patients will be asked to report the amount of paracetamol they have consumed for pain control each day during the first postoperative week. Patients will be asked to fill out an additional questionnaire at 6 months and 1 year about their perception of the treatment. Aspects will be as follows: comfort of the treated area (during mastication and brushing) and aesthetic.	immediately after the surgery, 12 hours after the surgery, 1 day, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 days and 2 weeks after the surgery
Secondary	Esthetic analysis	An examiner blinded to the patient allocation will assess the 30-day, 3-, 6- and 12-month photographs to score the aesthetic outcome of the intervention in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-10cm, where 0 is the worst and 10 is the best). The following aspects will be evaluated: color matching, tissue blending and the satisfaction of the patient.	30-day, 3-, 6- and 12-month
Secondary	Intra-surgical parameters	Both the harvested grafts, the applied xenogeneic matrix' dimension and the prepared recipient site will be measured and documented during the surgery. The measurements will be done using a UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA), to the nearest 0.5 mm.	During surgery
Secondary	Intra-surgical time	Surgical time will be recorded.	During the surgery
Secondary	Demographic data	affiliation data (age and sex) is recorded. For age the birthdate is recorded.	Baseline
Secondary	Anamnesis data	previous medical history (systemic diseases, medication, allergies)	Baseline, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Smoking habit	Smoking habit is recorded in number of cigarettes per day.	Baseline, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) (%)	Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) will be measured using a calibrated UNC15 periodontal probe (UNC15 periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy manufacturing, Co., LLC, Chicago, USA). Score will be expressed in percentage (%), it will be calculated by the number of sites where bleeding is recorded is divided by the total number of available sites in the mouth and multiplied by 100 to express the bleeding index as a percentage. 6 sites per tooth is recorded.	Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 and 12 months

External Links

•   Institutional homepage