View clinical trials related to Suicide Prevention.
Filter by:Depression is a major public health concern. In Dutch adolescents, the prevalence of major depressive disorder is estimated at 3.8%, and one in five adolescents report depressive symptoms. Depression is a risk factor in adolescent suicide. School-based prevention programs, for example the STORM approach, are effective in decreasing depressive symptoms among adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms at screening. However, not all adolescents attend general education. In the Netherlands, 7% of all adolescents enters special education (voortgezet speciaal onderwijs and prakijkonderwijs). They form a vulnerable subgroup concerning developing depressive symptoms and suicidality. To adapt and implement programs for these students, is complex yet crucial. This study aims to screen adolescents, offer them a prevention program to prevent the onset or continuation of depression and evaluate the effectiveness of this program. It is a randomised controlled trial with two conditions. The main study parameter is depressive symptomatology. Secondary study parameters are suicidality, anxiety and somatic complaints. Eligible students enter the second or third grade of special education, presenting elevated depressive symptoms. All adolescents will be screened for depressive and suicidal symptoms. Those reporting suicidality will be guided to specialised care, together with their parents. Adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms in the experimental condition will be offered the CBT-based preventive group training Op Volle Kracht in their school setting. The control condition consists of monitoring, and is offered the training if the intervention has shown to be effective. Participants will fill in longitudinal measurements. At all times, adolescents will be guided to mental health care if necessary. Furthermore, teachers in all participating schools will attend a training on how to detect and address depressive and suicidal symptoms among adolescents. The potential value of the study is that we can offer adolescents in the special educational sector a prevention program that is proven to be effective. In order to achieve this goal we need to evaluate the effectiveness of this prevention program in this target group. We are of opinion, however, that the risks associated with participation can be considered negligible. It is specifically aimed at depressive symptoms, within a population which receives care for other problems.
Increasing rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adolescents must be addressed. The study will adapt and collect preliminary effectiveness data on a digital suicide prevention intervention that can be delivered in pediatric primary care settings by front line pediatricians. The study has the potential to offer a low-cost and scalable primary care intervention that may decrease risk of suicide among at-risk youth.
The current study is a clinical trial, meaning a research study in which human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related behavioral outcomes. Specifically, male and female adolescents with current suicidal intent will be randomly assigned to receive either a 1-hour session of virtual crisis response planning (CRP), a 1-hour session of in-person CRP, or a 1-hour session of standard crisis risk management (treatment as usual). The feasibility and acceptability of the virtual CRP, compared to in-person CRP, will be assessed 14 days post-treatment. Additional assessments of changes in mood, behavior, and suicidality will be collected daily for 14 days post-treatment via ecological momentary assessments. The investigators hypothesize the following: 1) Virtual CRP will be rated as more feasible and acceptable compared to traditional CRP and treatment as usual interventions; 2) Both versions of CRP will be associated with changes in frequency and severity of suicidal ideation and behavior compared to treatment as usual; 3) Virtual CRP will be equally as effective as traditional CRP at reducing suicide risk, suggesting that virtual CRP is a promising scalable intervention adaptation.
The study will compare the effectiveness of two relatively brief and scalable evidence-based interventions: the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention and Follow-up Contacts (SPI+), a suicide-specific intervention that helps people prevent suicidal crises from escalating, and Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents Ultra Short Crisis Intervention (IPT-A SCI), a psychotherapeutic crisis intervention treatment for suicidal adolescents that teaches youth skills to prevent suicidal crises and addresses interpersonal problems that lead to suicidal crises. The results will inform the future standard of care for youth at risk for suicide presenting in the ED setting. This project focuses on suicidal youth ages 12-19 in three ethnically and racially diverse urban areas: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; and upper Manhattan/lower Bronx in New York City.
The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to test an adapted suicide prevention program (the Building VA Engagement, Self-efficacy, and Social Support To Prevent Suicide or BESST) in rural Veterans discharged from community care mental health treatment settings. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does BESST combined with standard care improve suicide-related outcomes among this population compared to standard care alone? Participants will be assigned by change to a treatment group. Some will receive the BESST intervention combined with standard care, and some will receive standard care alone. All participants will be in this research study for up to three months. Those receiving the BESST intervention will have: - 1 one-hour brief educational session; - Seven follow-up check-ins (~30 minutes each) All participants will have three assessment interviews where they will be asked about their mental health and treatment received outside of the VA. The investigators will compare participants assigned to the BESST intervention combined with standard care vs participants assigned to standard care alone to see if the BESST intervention improves suicide-related outcomes.
This study adds to the existing evidence on suicide prevention helpline efficacy because it tackles some of the common limitations for helpline studies. High risk individuals were not excluded from the study, since there was no human interference in deciding if the study was offered to the lifeline callers. Most of the existing studies exclude users in high risk and acute crisis situations. The study employed the callers' own ratings on a set of questions, automatically offered within the phone system immediately before and after the call to assess the immediate impact of the call and the intervention. The automatization of the self-report measures in the telephone system reduces the burden on the operators to offer the research questions without interrupting the crisis intervention and decreases the risk of bias in caller responses. The goal of this observational study is to evaluatie the Flesmish suicide prevention helpline in people who call the helpline when feeling suicidal. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Has the degree to which the caller feels in crisis subsided? (Crisis in this is seen as the subjective feeling of complete emotional upset) 2. Does the caller report feeling less suicidal? (Score on selected indicators of suicidality, particularly hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent and social support) 3. Is the caller satisfied with the conversation? 4. Which elements in the conversation (i.e., responders' interventions) make it more or less effective, in terms of crisis level, suicidality (indicators) and caller satisfaction? 5. Which elements of the conversation do callers name as (not) helpful during the follow-up conversation? Which elements promoted progress in this, besides merely lowering the crisis level? 6. What possible (follow-up) actions do callers see as helping to sustain and/or improve the longer-term impact of the conversation with the suicide prevention helpline? Participants are asked the fill in items before the call, immediately after the call and one to two weeks after the call.
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. one-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. enhanced usual care for suicide prevention in adults and adolescents.
The goal of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a co-designed suicide prevention package of implementation strategies (SuPP) in a pilot open, non-randomized, clinical trial. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What is the feasibility of implementing the SuPP open clinical trial? 2. What is the degree to which SuPP was implemented correctly 3. What is the perceived acceptability of SuPP among providers and patients? Participants will include healthcare providers and patients at risk for suicide. Providers will identify and provide culturally adapted safety planning and contact follow up to at-risk patients over a period of six months. Patients will receive an initial culturally adapted patient-centered safety plan and receive a tapered series of contacts (phone calls) over the course of six months from health providers.
Suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people aged 12-17 years in the United States, yet many youth at risk for suicide are not identified or go untreated. Stepped care approaches have been shown to be effective at reducing suicide risk in clinical settings, including primary care. The goal of this hybrid I stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation study is to test the effectiveness of a population-based quality improvement (QI) intervention, entitled STARRS-PC (Stepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care) compared to treatment as usual (TAU), in reducing the risk of suicidal behavior among youth in the pediatric primary care setting. STARRS-PC implements a clinical pathway for youth at elevated risk for suicide in pediatric primary care clinics. Clinical pathways are tools used by health professionals to guide evidence-informed practice. The STARRS-PC pathway consists of three evidence-based suicide clinical care processes: risk detection, assessment and triage, and, if needed, follow-up transitional care. STARRS-PC is guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation, and Sustainability Model (PRISM), which allows for the study of factors that influence effective implementation of the suicide prevention clinical pathway and is focused on scalability. The main questions the study aims to answer are: - Will STARRS-PC be more effective than TAU at reducing the rate of suicide attempt at 12 months post-baseline (primary outcome)? - Will STARRS-PC be more effective than TAU at reducing suicidal ideation and non-suicidal self-injury, and improving family satisfaction at 12 months post-baseline (secondary outcomes)? - What are the barriers and facilitators of effective implementation and sustainability of STARRS-PC?
Scientific advances are constantly leading to better treatments. However, it is quite challenging for healthcare systems, including VA, to ask very busy providers to change the way they practice. The MIDAS QUERI program helps providers improve the way they treat VA patients. This project will focus on increasing referrals to the Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (SP 2.0) initiative through the delivery of Academic Detailing and LEAP (a team-based quality improvement program). SP 2.0 provides accessible, evidence-based suicide prevention treatment to all Veterans with a history of suicidal self-directed violence or preparatory behaviors in the past 12 months.