Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation

Stroke Clinical Trial

— STROKEBOSS  

Official title:

Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation: Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to Compare the Therapeutic Effectiveness of a Personalized EEG-triggered Repetitive High-frequency TMS Therapy Protocol With Standard Low-frequency TMS Therapy Protocol in Patients With Spastic Paresis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05005780
• Other study ID #: 2019-07, Version 4
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 2, 2019
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: July 2021
• Source: University Hospital Tuebingen
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical pilot trial investigates the therapeutic potential of a novel personalized therapeutic brain-stimulation protocol in chronic stroke patients with spasticity. Stroke patients will either receive ipsilesional 100 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) triplet burst protocol synchronized to the ongoing µ-alpha oscillation or contralesional 1 Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) protocol. Motor recovery is assessed directly after as well as three months after completion of the therapy.

Description:

Stroke is one of the leading cause for long-term disability worldwide. The standard approach to treat deficits after stroke is a rehabilitation therapy, that follows the stroke event directly. This therapy mainly includes physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Yet, despite intensive rehabilitation efforts, more than half of all stroke patients remain greatly disabled. Repetitive TMS is capable of inducing plasticity-like effects in the brain, that are expected to enhance adaptive plasticity processes leading to functional regain after stroke. In the motor cortex, brain oscillation-synchronized TMS, i.e. TMS triggered dependent on the phase of instantaneous µ-alpha oscillations as detected by real-time EEG (electroencephalography) analysis, has been shown to consistently increase motor cortical excitability and plasticity effects. We therefore hypothesis that a greater therapeutic potential of TMS to modulate dysfunctional brain networks can be exploited by personalizing TMS therapy to individual brain states (i.e. brain oscillations). This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of an ipsilesional 100 Hz TMS triplet burst protocol synchronized to the ongoing µ-alpha oscillation compared to the current TMS standard therapy of contralesional 1 Hz rTMS in chronic stroke patients. Both groups will undergo stimulation therapy three times a week, with each session directly followed by physiotherapy. Motor recovery will be assessed directly after as well as three months after completion of the therapy.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients are between 18 to 85 years old

2. Patient suffers from chronic stroke including hand/arm paresis and spasticity

3. Ipsilesional motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be evoked (EMG > 50uV)

4. RMT of contralesional side < 70% maximum stimulator output (MSO)

5. Patient is willing to comply with the study restrictions.

6. Subject FMA-UE at the lesioned side is <= 60. Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is under the age of legal consent.

2. Patient has a history of seizure disorder.

3. Patient with intake of pro-convulsive medication, e.g. , chlorpromazine, clozapine, foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy), phencyclidine (PCP, angel's dust), ketamine, gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), alcohol, theophylline, in accord with present consensus guidelines on safety, ethical considerations, and application of TMS in clinical practice and research (Rossi et al., 2009, 2021).

4. Subject with intake of muscle-relaxing medication (e.g. baclofen, tizanidine, gabapentin,tolperisone, THC and derivates)

5. When spasticity is treated with botox there have to be at least tree months since the last injection

6. Patient has a cardiac pacemaker, implanted medication pump, intracardiac line, that is located close to (= 10 cm) to the location of activation of the TMS coil or acute, unstable cardiac disease.

7. Patient has an intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimula-tors, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object that is located close to (= 10 cm) to the location of activation of the TMS coil (excluding the mouth) and that cannot be safely removed.

8. Patient has participated in another study within 2 weeks prior to the first study visit.

9. Patient is pregnant or trying to get pregnant.

10. Patient is unable to give informed consent.

11. Patient is unable to understand the instructions of the FMA-UE or not motivated to follow these instructions.

12. Patients who have contractions and therefore can't move.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Stroke

Intervention

Device:
• Negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Ipsilesional negative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS.
• 1 Hz rTMS
MagVenture MagPro X100: Contralesional 1 Hz rTMS.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	University Hospital Tübingen, Department for Neurology and Stroke	Tübingen	Baden-Württemberg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Hospital Tuebingen

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)	Upper limb, affected side	Difference of score directly before intervention and score directly after intervention
Primary	Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)	Upper limb, affected side	Difference of score directly before intervention and score 3 months after intervention
Secondary	Change in Wolf-Motor Function Test	Upper limb, affected side	Difference of score directly before intervention and score directly after intervention
Secondary	Change in Modified Ashworth Scale	Upper limb, affected side	Difference of score directly before intervention and score directly after intervention
Secondary	Change in PSAD spasticity assessment device score	Upper limb, affected side	Difference of score directly before intervention and score directly after intervention
Secondary	Change in Resting-motor-threshold (RMT)	Hand knob, affected hemisphere	Difference of score directly before intervention and score directly after intervention