Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03268798
• Other study ID #: D015017-2011-2015
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: August 24, 2017
• Last updated: August 29, 2017
• Start date: March 2015
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2017

Study information

• Verified date: August 2017
• Source: University of Victoria
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Following stroke, muscle weakness and impaired motor function are expressed in both the more (MA; paretic) and less affected (LA; non-paretic) sides. Although the efficacy of resistance training is well recognized, training the MA limb directly may be initially difficult due to muscular weakness. "Cross-education" is training one side of the body increases strength in the untrained and opposite side. This concept can be applied in strength training when training the more affected sides cannot be initiated. Recently, our lab found six weeks of dorsiflexion resistance training in the LA leg improved the strength of both trained and untrained legs of chronic stroke participants.

The current project explored if cross-education exists in the upper limb in chronic stroke participants and if there are related changes in cortical and spinal cord plasticity. We hypothesized that unilateral strength in the less affected arm could enhance wrist extension strength bilaterally with related neural adoption and improved clinical function.

Description:

Stroke produces muscle weakness seen on both more (paretic, MA) and less affected (non-paretic, LA) sides. "Cross-education" is training one side of the body increases strength or motor skill in the same muscles on the untrained side. This can be applied to enhance muscle strength in the MA side and we found that 6 weeks of dorsiflexion resistance training with the LA leg improved strength bilaterally in chronic stroke. To explore if cross-education occurs also in the upper limb after stroke, participants will complete a 5-week unilateral wrist extension training.

Twenty four participants will be recruited, 12 from Rehabilitation Neuroscience laboratory at University of Victoria, 12 from Brain Behaviour Laboratory at University of British Columbia. Before and after training, maximal voluntary contraction wrist extension force was measured with a 6-axis load cell using Cartesian coordinates (Fz = extension). Electromyography of extensor and flexor carpi radialis, biceps and triceps brachii were recorded. Fugl-Meyer and partial Wolf Motor Function Test were performed by the same physical therapist at each location. Reciprocal inhibition from wrist flexors to extensors, cutaneous reflexes evoked by median and superficial radial nerve stimulation were assessed in those at UVIC. Cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation and transcallosal inhibition from transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured in participants at UBC.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2017
• Est. primary completion date: July 1, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Over 6 months post-stroke;

• One side of arm shows muscle weakness

• Pass the screening test of Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire

• Pass the screening test for dementia

• Free from dementia (score < 24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and any other contradiction for TMS test

Exclusion Criteria:

• Had medication affecting muscle tone within the past 3 months

• Wear a pacemaker

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Stroke

Intervention

Device:
• Unilateral wrist extension training
Participants will join a five-week training protocol with 3 sessions per week. During each session, 5 sets 5 maximal wrist extension training will be performed on participants less affected side.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Victoria	University of British Columbia

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in wrist extension force	To test if training could improve wrist extension strength, maximal wrist extension force were measured in both arms during the 3 baseline pretests, 1 post-test. There was a week in between each baseline tests, post-test will be performed within one week after the training finished. To test if the force changes maintained after training, follow-up test was performed 5 weeks after training finished.	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test; Week 13: follow-up test
Secondary	Changes in the modulation of spinal-mediated muscle reflexes	To test if training could induce neural adaptation at spinal level, spinal-mediated muscle reflexes include reciprocal inhibition and cutaneous reflexes in the wrist extensor muscle were measured. Muscle reflex amplitudes were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
Secondary	Neural adaptation in the corticospinal pathway	To test if training could induced neural adaptation at corticospinal level, cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation and transcallosal from transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured in wrist extensor muscle. Changes in the muscle reflex amplitudes and cortical silent period duration were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
Secondary	Upper limb impairment assessments	Fugl-Meyer test score were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
Secondary	Upper limb function assessments	Wolf Motor Function Test were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training.	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training (no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test; Week 13: follow-up test
Secondary	Ten-meter walking test	Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training (no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
Secondary	Six-minute walking test	Walking distance was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
Secondary	Timed up and go	Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.	Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;