Stroke Rehabilitation Clinical Trial
— SM-FESOfficial title:
Self-modulated Functional Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Severe and Moderate Upper Limb Paresis: A Multi-Centre, Single-Blind, Randomized Parallel Study
Verified date | May 2023 |
Source | Intento SA |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The study aims at demonstrating the efficacy of self-modulated functional electrical stimulation (SM-FES) in promoting upper-limb (UL) motor recovery in chronic stroke patients with severe and severe-moderate paralysis. The effect of such experimental therapy will be compared to dose-matched, goal-oriented standard care (SC). SM-FES consists of intensive, goal-oriented, repetitive functional exercises assisted by electrical stimulation. The patient actively self-administers the electrical stimulation on the impaired limb by controlling the electrical stimulation device with the non-impaired hand. The duration of the intervention is 90 min per day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 29 |
Est. completion date | May 22, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | October 26, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - diagnosis of one, first-ever ischemic stroke verified by brain imaging (i.e. computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging); - chronic impairment after stroke, i.e. time since event = 6months; - severe and severe-moderate upper limb impairment, i.e. FMA-UE score = 34; - 18 = age < 80; - ability to give consent, understand the device use and follow instructions. Exclusion Criteria: - an unstable recovery stage, measured as a difference between screening and baseline examinations of more than 3 points in the motor part of the FMA-UE scale; - contraindications and risk factors to neuromuscular electrical stimulation; - severe hemi-spatial neglect or anosognosia involving the affected arm, as determined by the Bells tests (> 6 errors); - severe impairment of proprioception, as evaluated from the blinded detection and discrimination of imposed passive movements (= 20° extension or flexion) of the finger proximal joint (>3 errors out of 6 mobilisations); - severe impairment of tactile sensing in the hand, as assessed by Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (no detection of the 5.88 size evaluator); - excessive spasticity, as indicated by a score > 2 in any of the items of the REsistance to PASsive movement (REPAS) arm subtest; - recurrent, moderate to high upper limb pain limiting delivery of rehabilitation dose, i.e. pain at rest and in correspondence of a passive range of motion lower than 50%; - botulinum toxin injection into affected upper extremity during 3 months before the study or during the study; - history of physical / medical conditions interfering with study procedure, for example shoulder subluxation, upper extremity injury that limits the function of the hand or arm, skin lesion/rash/open wound on the affected upper extremity, or similar; - history of neurological condition interfering with study procedure, e.g. Parkinson's disease, progressive brain diseases like dementia and tumours; - use of antipsychotic medications; - enrolled in the past six months in another study involving drugs, biologics, upper limb experimental therapy, or similar. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Switzerland | Inselspital | Bern | |
Switzerland | Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève | Genève | |
Switzerland | Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois | Lausanne | Vaud |
Switzerland | Klinik Bethesda Tschugg | Tschugg |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Intento SA | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Innosuisse - Swiss Innovation Agency, KLINIK BETHESDA Tschugg, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Bern |
Switzerland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in the motor part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale, calculated from baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) | The FMA-UE measures the upper limb motor impairment. FMA-UE consists of 33 items. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, 1, and 2) with 0 generally corresponding to no function, 1 to partial function, and 2 to perfect function. The items are summed to the final maximal score of 66 (no impairment).The FMA may also be divided into shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand sub-scores consisting of 18 and 15 tasks, with a maximum score of 36 and 30, respectively. Higher scores indicate less impairment. | From baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scale at 3 months (T3) compared to baseline (T0) | The FMA-UE measures the upper limb motor impairment. FMA-UE consists of 33 items. Each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, 1, and 2) with 0 generally corresponding to no function, 1 to partial function, and 2 to perfect function. The items are summed to the final maximal score of 66 (no impairment). The FMA may also be divided into shoulder/elbow and wrist/hand sub-scores consisting of 18 and 15 tasks, with a maximum score of 36 and 30, respectively. Higher scores indicate less impairment. | At 3 months (T3) compared to baseline (T0) | |
Secondary | Number and proportion of patients with change of at least 5 FMA-UE points from baseline (T0) to 2 weeks (T2) post-intervention and 3 months (T3) follow-up | Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). | From baseline (T0) to 2 weeks (T2) post-intervention and 3 months (T3) follow-up | |
Secondary | Change of upper limb function measured by the Action Research Arm test (ARAT) from baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up | The ARAT measures of the upper limb function. It contains 19 items grouped into 4 subscales: grasp, grip, pinch and gross motor. In the first 3 subscales, the scale assessed the ability to grasp, move, and release objects of differing size, weight, and shapes. The last subtest evaluates 3 gross movements (place hand behind head, place hand on top of head, and move hand to mouth). Each item is graded on an ordinal scale from 0-3, all of which are summed to yield a score of 0 to 57. Higher scores indicate less impairment. | From baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Change of perceived upper limb function measured by the Motor Activity Log (MAL) from baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up | The MAL is a measure of perceived upper limb disability in activities of daily living.
The MAL-14 includes 14 items, scored on an 11-point amount of use (AOU) scale (range 0-5) to rate how much the arm is used and an 11-point quality of movement (QOM) scale (range 0-5) to rate how well patients are using their affected upper extremity. |
From baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Change of hand and arm spasticity measured by the REsistance to PASsive movement (REPAS) from baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up | The REPAS consists of several items across different defined joints, each of which are rated according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (0 = no increase in muscle tone to 4 = limb rigid in flexion or extension), and includes assessments of the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, finger. A higher score indicates more severe impairment, with a maximum upper limb score of 64. | From baseline to post-intervention (2 weeks) and to 3 months follow-up |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03031977 -
Visceral Mobilization and Functional Constipation in Stroke Survivors
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04378946 -
Error Augmentation Motor Learning Training Approach in Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05690165 -
Effects of Aerobic Exercise During the Early Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06053970 -
Study Evaluating the Effect of Moving Virtual Scenes on Postural Balance in a Stroke Rehabilitation Setting
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03023150 -
Ischemic Preconditioning as an Intervention to Improve Stroke Rehabilitation - Froedtert
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06128187 -
The Effect of Dual Task Training on Upper Extremity Functions in Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03773653 -
Synergistic Bilateral Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Based on Robotic Priming Technique
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05505201 -
Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Subacute Stroke Patients With Severe Upper Limb Paresis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05993091 -
Mirror Therapy and Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04682223 -
Telerehabilitation for Aphasia (TERRA)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03165630 -
Stroke Patients' Outpatient Rehabilitation Therapy (SPORT)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04800601 -
Walking Ankle isoKinetic Exercise
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944666 -
Substantiation and Standardization of the Multimodal Cognitive-motor Rehabilitation System for Afterstroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05447754 -
Comparison of the Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation Versus Traditional Balance Training on Balance and Fear of Falling in Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03798340 -
Vibratory Perturbation-based Pinch Task Training for Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02603718 -
An Applicative On-line EEG Tool for Enhancing Treatment Efficacy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05391919 -
Multimodal Correction of Post-stroke Motor and Cognitive Impairments
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05945212 -
Effects of Local Vibrations Program of Dorsiflexor Muscles on Neuromotor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04753931 -
Effects of Sensory Training Application in Addition to Bobath Training
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03866057 -
Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation
|