Stroke, Ischemic Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effect of Visual Retraining on Visual Loss Following Visual Cortical Damage
Verified date | August 2023 |
Source | University of Rochester |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This project is intended to collect data using standard clinical tests and psychophysics to quantify the effect of visual cortical damage on the structure of the residual visual system, visual perception, spatial awareness, and brain function. The investigators will also assess the effect of intensive visual retraining on the residual visual system, processing of visual information and the use of such information in real-world situations following damage. This research is intended to improve our understanding of the consequences of permanent visual system damage in humans, of methods that can be used to reverse visual loss, and of brain mechanisms by which visual recovery is achieved.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 280 |
Est. completion date | October 15, 2031 |
Est. primary completion date | October 15, 2031 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 17 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Cortically Blind Subject Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects between the ages of 17 and 75, who have sustained damage to primary visual cortex at age 17 or later, and are rendered blind over a portion of their visual field. - Subjects must have some intact visual cortical areas (other than primary visual cortex) in the damaged brain hemisphere. This assessment will be made from MRI or CT scans of the subject's head, which will be obtained via standard release from their neurologist. - Subjects who demonstrate a clear deficit in either simple or complex visual perception in portions of their visual field. - Subjects who are competent and responsible, as determined by the Principal Investigator. - Subjects who will receive retinal electrophysiology (mfERG) testing must have a report from their ophthalmologist stating that they are able to receive dilating drops Cortically Blind Subject Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects who do not possess damage of primary visual cortex or its immediate afferents - Subjects who are suffering from an active disease process involving their nervous system. - Subjects who are unable to fixate visual targets precisely with their eyes - Subjects who have unreliable vision fields from prior testing indicated by greater than 20% fixation losses, false positives or false negatives - Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in either eye - Impaired foveal sensitivity as indicated by visual field tests - Presence of vision loss from ocular disease or disorder - Presence of bilateral visual acuity loss from any source - Subjects who are suffering from one-sided attentional neglect - Subjects who have impaired auditory thresholds that would influence test results and training efficacy (all our testing and training involves sound as a cue for trial/stimulus onset or as feedback) - Persons who lack the competence or are otherwise unable to perform the visual training exercises as directed. Control Subject Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects must be between the ages of 17 and 75 years of age - Subjects must report no history of neurological disorder. - Subjects who are competent and responsible, as determined by the Principal Investigator. Control Subject Exclusion criteria: - Subjects who possess damage to the visual system - Subjects who are suffering from an active disease process involving their nervous system. - Subjects who are unable to fixate visual targets precisely with their eyes - Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in either eye - Presence of vision loss from ocular disease or disorder - Presence of bilateral visual acuity loss from any source - Subjects who are suffering from one-sided attentional neglect - Subjects who have impaired auditory thresholds that would influence test results and training efficacy (all our testing and training involves sound as a cue for trial/stimulus onset or as feedback) - Persons who lack the competence or are otherwise unable to perform the visual testing/training exercises as directed. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Rochester | National Eye Institute (NEI) |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Direction Discrimination Threshold | For each subject, the investigators will measure the change in ability to detect differences in the motion direction of visual stimuli relative to horizontal, measured in degrees of visual angle. These assessments will be based on what can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance.
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months | |
Primary | Direction Integration Threshold | This will measure the change in ability of subjects to integrate across a range of motion directions measured in degrees of visual angle. These assessments will be based on what range of motion directions can be reliably integrated at a 72-75% correct level of performance.
These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline to 4-months, 12-months | |
Primary | Contrast Sensitivity for Direction | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for direction discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the motion direction of visual stimuli that are also varying in contrast against a grey background. We will measure the luminance contrast that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months | |
Primary | Contrast Sensitivity for Static Orientation | Assessment of visual perception transfer to untrained psychophysical tasks of contrast sensitivity for static orientation discrimination. This is a change metric as transfer must be compared from pre- to post- each course of training.
For each subject, the investigators will measure the ability to correctly detect the orientation of non-moving visual stimuli that vary in contrast against a grey background. We will measure the luminance that can be reliably detected at a 72-75% correct level of performance. These measures of change will be evaluated baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months | |
Secondary | Humphrey 10-2 and 24-2 perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months | |
Secondary | Goldmann perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in area of vision (degrees squared) as encompassed by each isopter, measured by one of 3 different light stimuli.
The 3 isopters which will be compared are: I2e 1asb, 0.25 mm^2 I4e 10asb, 0.25 mm^2 V4e 1000asb, 64 mm^2 These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months | |
Secondary | MAIA Visual Field Perimetry | The investigators will measure the change in visual sensitivity (measured in decibels) at all locations tested by the system.
These measures will be evaluated at baseline and at each subsequent visit to the laboratory; minimally from baseline to 4-months, then baseline to 12-months from start of training. |
Baseline, 4-months, 12-months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03993236 -
Study on Rosuvastatin+Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin for LDL-C Goal in Patients With Recent Ischemic Stroke
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04069767 -
Innovative Physiotherapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06342206 -
The Assessment of Acute /Chronic Phase in Patients With Ischemic Cerebral Stroke Using TCM Diagnostic Tools
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03605381 -
MORbidity PRevalence Estimate In StrokE
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04956211 -
Periodontal Treatment and Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03942588 -
High-intensity Interval Training After Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04949334 -
Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04095767 -
Assessing Safety and Performance of the ANA Catheter System, Combined With a Stent Retriever in Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06352086 -
Understanding Visual Processing After Occipital Stroke
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04991038 -
Clinical Investigation to Compare Safety and Efficacy of DAISE and Stent Retrievers for Thrombectomy In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01937182 -
The Efficacy of Citalopram Treatment in Acute Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03649295 -
Combined Conventional Speech Therapy and Functional Electrical Stimulation in Dysphagia Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05303649 -
Effects of Neuronavigated Theta Burst Stimulation in Therapy of Post-stroke Aphasia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04233515 -
Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Symptoms in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Örebro County
|
||
Completed |
NCT05102877 -
Sensory Versus Motor Level Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04089917 -
A Study of the Use of the Q Aspiration Catheter to Remove Clot in Stroke Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT05221112 -
Effects of PNF Patterns Training on Trunk Balance, and Gait in Chronic Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05035953 -
Thrombolysis Combined With Edaravone Dexborneol on Hemorrhagic Transformation for Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT06326801 -
Resistive Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise With Pursed Lips Breathing Exercise in Sub-acute Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03826030 -
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Motor Recovery
|
Phase 2 |