View clinical trials related to Spinal Fusion.
Filter by:A study that compares between Open TLIF and Minimally invasive TLIF regarding patients' functional status(Oswestry Disability index)as a primary outcome measure.
The SPINEREG study is a prospective observational registry. Eligible patients are subjects undergoing spine surgery at the participating institutions. Baseline health status and follow-up health status are recorded at pre-established steps.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of MagnetOs™ Granules as an alternative to autologous bone graft in adult patients undergoing an instrumented posterolateral fusion of the thoracolumbar, lumbar or lumbosacral spine, in terms of efficacy and safety. After instrumentation and based on randomization, one side of the spine will be grafted with MagnetOs™ Granules and the other side with autologous bone graft. Thereby, each patient serves as its own control.
Readmissions increasingly serve as a metric of hospital performance, inviting quality improvement initiatives in both medicine and surgery. Recently, a readmission reduction program in the United States was associated with significantly shorter length of stay, earlier discharge, and reduced 30-day readmission after elective neurosurgery. These results underscore the importance of patient education and surveillance after hospital discharge, and it would be beneficial to test whether the same approach yields beneficial results in a different health system, the NHS. In this study, the investigators will replicate the Transitional Care Program (TCP) published by Robertson et al.(Journal of Neurosurgery 2017) with the goal of decreasing length of stay, improving discharge efficiency, and reducing readmissions in neurosurgical patients by optimizing patient education and post-discharge surveillance.
Use an RCT study design to measure pain experience, medication use, medical side effects, and length of hospital stay with and without availability of VR following spine fusion surgery
Prospective Follow-up study of CeSPACE XP coated PEEK cages for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease
This study is planned and conducted to document all patients in the participating Centers, who are treated with the CE-marked product, the Fixateur Ennovate®, regardless of the diagnosis or indication. Data on performance and safety of the product, validated patient based questionnaires (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) as well as the satisfaction of the patients in general are captured.
The Zalviso® Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System (SSTS) (Grünenthal Italia, Milan, Italy) is a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system approved in September 2015 by the European Commission for the management of acute moderate-to-severe pain in adult patients in a hospital setting. This preprogrammed drug/device combination product delivers a fixed dose of 15 mcg of sufentanil tablets as needed, in a non-invasive sublingual dosage form. Multimodal analgesia is defined as the administration, by one or more routes, of various analgesic medications with different mechanisms of action, thereby providing superior analgesia with fewer side effects. To improve pain control and patient satisfaction, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) techniques have been developed, i.e. any delivery system which allows patients to self administer predetermined doses of analgesic drug to relieve pain. Over the past decades, intravenous (IV) PCA with morphine has been the gold standard for acute pain control. In our clinical practice, though, not only IV-PCA pumps were frequently prone to technical problems, but also patients and caregivers were not often able to understand or activate them, thus raising important safety issues and profoundly affecting the management of pain control. As a consequence, IV-PCA eventually fell into disuse, although no alternative has emerged until recently. The SSTS should go beyond the above-quoted limitations: it is a non invasive, patient-controlled and easy to use device, with an effective and safe opioid profile. It is, in our thinking, a promising technology. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to examine the role of the SSTS for management of pain after vertebral surgery, as part of a multimodal approach.
The aim of the current study is to examine the effect of a case manager-assisting rehabilitation program compared to usual physical rehabilitation for patients undergoing a lumbar spinal fusion on functional disability, pain, and return to work. Furthermore, to explore if the case manager-assisted rehabilitation program is cost-effective in a societal perspective compared to usual rehabilitation. Participants: 82 patients undergoing a lumbar spinal fusion due to disc degeneration or spondylolisthesis. Participants are adults of both gender. Patients are included from Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, and Region Hospital of Silkeborg, Denmark. Participants will be block randomised at each centre. The participants were randomized 1:1 to case manager-assisted rehabilitation (intervention group) or usual physical rehabilitation (control group). Both groups received usual physical rehabilitation. The patients in the intervention group meet pre-operatively with a case manager in order to set a plan for their return to daily activities and work. The intervention also included post-surgical meetings, phone meetings, work place visits, or voluntary roundtable meetings.
The purpose of this study is to see if Tranexamic Acid can safely reduce bleeding in people undergoing spinal fusion surgery.