Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Anaesthesia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Anaesthesia.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05343845 Recruiting - Pregnancy Clinical Trials

Does Smoking Effect Spinal Anesthesia?

Start date: February 28, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Background In the last 10 years, the rate of smoking in women of childbearing age has increased gradually. The smoking affects general anesthesia negatively. Can smoking also affect regional anesthesia in pregnant women? Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of smoking on spinal anesthesia applied for C/S in pregnant women. Methods After approval of the institution's ethics committee, 100 patients will divided in two groups as pregnant women who did not smoke during pregnancy and pregnant women who smoked 5 or more cigarettes in a day. The local anesthetic, which dose will be adjusted according to height and weight, and 20 µg fentanyl will administered intrathecally to both groups. Results on the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia will monitored. Results The data of 100 parturients will investigated. The onset time of sensory and motor block, the duration of motor and sensory block, APGAR and VAS scores will be monitored. In addition, C/S indications, side effects, patient satisfaction, additional medication need and, spinal anesthesia preferences will be monitored. Conclusions Smoking affects many systems. According to the onset of sensory block, duration of sensory and motor block and, VAS scores, which determine the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia, it will be evaluated whether smoking also affects spinal anesthesia in pregnant women.

NCT ID: NCT03687411 Recruiting - Obesity Clinical Trials

An Ultrasound Guided Automated Spinal Landmark Identification System

uSINE
Start date: May 24, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neuraxial ultrasonography has been shown a safe and effective technique to enhance the overall success rate of lumbar puncture and reduce the number of injection attempts. However, the current blind palpation landmark technique is known to be highly inaccurate and may increase the risk of multiple insertion attempts, patient suffering and complication rates such as spinal cord injury. Various clinical studies have confirmed the effectiveness of ultrasound imaging compared with the traditional palpation method. However, none of the present system can achieve real-time guidance. The overall aim of this proposal is to develop an ultrasound guided automated spinal landmark identification with real-time neuraxial needle insertion system (uSINE) to improve patient safety and efficacy of neuraxial procedure needle insertion success. This will be achieved in 4 phases of technology development and clinical trial phases. The investigators will recruit 20 subjects in a prospective cohort study to investigate the spinal needle first attempt success rate as a clinically relevant outcome. The secondary aim is to develop an automated spinal landmark identification algorithm using image processing to identify spinal landmarks in 50 obese patients. Third phase objective will be to obtain clinical data, and evaluation and annotation of the clinical data of spinal ultrasonography in 65 obese patients (BMI > 30kg/m2), whereas the fourth phase will measure the uSINE identification accuracy and first-attempt puncture success rate of uSINE in a clinical study of 65 obese patients (BMI > 30kg/m2).

NCT ID: NCT03221829 Recruiting - Bladder Tumor Clinical Trials

A Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Anaesthesia for TURBT Procedures in Elderly Patients

Start date: July 6, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of spinal anesthesia among elderly patients The basic methods for diagnosis and management of bladder cancer include endoscopic procedures (cystoscopy, trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour TURBT). The age of most patients is above 60, which increases the risk of complications during the perioperative period. Usually the leading anaesthesia method in TURBT procedures is regional, mainly spinal, anaesthesia. Although the prevalence of regional upon general anaesthesia is questioned, certain positive aspects of regional anaesthesia are indisputable. Maintaining logical communication with a patient during the procedure enables early diagnosis of complications (TUR syndrome, bladder perforation). Undeniably, regional anaesthesia ensures the best pain management in the early post-operative period. The simplicity of performing an efficacious spinal block and its cost-effectiveness are additional factors, which have contributed to the acknowledgement of the method as the standard of anaesthesia for transurethral procedures.