Feasibility and Acceptability Followed by Effectiveness of bCPAP for Treatment of Children Aged 1-59 Months With Severe Pneumonia in Ethiopia

Severe Pneumonia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Feasibility and Acceptability Followed by Effectiveness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) for Treatment of Children Aged 1-59 Months With Severe Pneumonia in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03870243
• Other study ID #: PR-18052
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 2, 2019
• Est. completion date: July 27, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Principal Investigator: Mohammod Jobayer Chisti Research Protocol Title: Feasibility and Acceptability Followed by Effectiveness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) for Treatment of Children aged 1-59 months with Severe Pneumonia in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Proposed start date: 1st July 2018, Estimated end date: 31st December 2022 Background: Feasibility and acceptability followed by effectiveness of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were not evaluated in childhood severe pneumonia in developing countries at a larger scale. Objectives: Stages I and II - To assess the feasibility and acceptability (not only by patients' care-givers but also by physicians and nurses) of bubble CPAP in treating childhood severe pneumonia in two tertiary hospitals in Stage I and in two district hospitals in Stage II - To record adverse events following use of bubble CPAP in these settings - To understand how much resource and time are needed to institutionalize and maintain bubble CPAP as a routine practice in the health system Stage III: - To determine therapeutic efficacy/effectiveness of bubble CPAP compared to WHO standard low flow oxygen in reducing treatment failure in children admitted to hospitals with severe pneumonia and hypoxemia - To determine therapeutic effectiveness of bubble CPAP compared to WHO standard low flow oxygen in reducing treatment failure & mortality in children aged 1-12 months admitted to hospitals with severe pneumonia and hypoxemia - To record adverse events (pneumothorax, abdominal distension, nasal trauma, aspiration pneumonia) encountered.

Description:

Methodology: Cluster randomized controlled clinical trial Methodology: 1. Stages I and II: Feasibility/demonstration stage will be done as an internal pilot in 3 hospitals a. Current treatment practice, facilities, and operational challenges will be evaluated for the introduction, clinical use and maintenance of bubble CPAP 2. Stage III: Implementation of bubble CPAP will be done in 12 hospitals a. It will be done following a cluster randomized design Data collection-socio-demographic and clinical data will be collected using structured questionnaire by trained nurses and physicians. Research Site: St. Paulos Millennium Medical College, Yekatit 12 and Tikur Anbessa Specialized hospitals, 14 district hospitals Number of Participants/Patients: Stage I-30 children in each tertiary hospital (this stage has completed and we enrolled 49 children from two tertiary hospitals; these 49 enrolled children took double of our anticipated time {4 months}) Stage II- 20 children in each general hospital (2 general/district hospitals, we have enrolled total 40 children from this two hospitals from January 2020 to July 2020, which included COVID-19 period) Stage III-1240 children in 12 general/district hospitals (620 in bubble CPAP arm and 620 in WHO standard low flow arm; each hospital will be the cluster and 6 will be randomized to each arm) Main Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 1 month and 59 months - Meet WHO clinical criteria for severe pneumonia with hypoxemia - Hypoxemia (Oxygen saturation <90% in room air) - Parent/guardian gives informed consent to participate in the study Statistical Analysis: - STATA -14: for initial two phases descriptive analysis of level of feasibility and acceptability will be performed - For the phase III: We shall follow the principle of intention to treat. --Treatment failure and/or death will be analyzed using χ² or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. - Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared by calculating relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. - Log-linear binomial regression will be applied to adjust for covariates to evaluate the true impact of bubble CPAP in evaluating primary and secondary outcomes and to adjust for baseline differences. - Continuous variables will be analyzed using the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. Study Duration: 48 months.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1240
• Est. completion date: July 27, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: July 27, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 1 Month to 59 Months

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age between 1 month and 59 months,
• Meet WHO clinical criteria for severe pneumonia with hypoxemia.
• Oxygen saturation <90% despite standard flow oxygen therapy
• Parent/guardian gives informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known congenital heart disease, asthma, or upper -airway obstruction
• Tracheostomy
• Pneumothorax
• Needs mechanical ventilation for any specific reason as decided by the clinician

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pneumonia
• Severe Pneumonia

Intervention

Device:
• Bubble CPAP
To see the effectiveness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) in children with severe pneumonia
• Low flow oxygen
To see the effectiveness of low flow oxygen in children with severe pneumonia

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Bangladesh	International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b)	Dhaka	Mohakhali

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh	Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Ethiopia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Bangladesh, 

References & Publications (24)

Buckmaster AG, Arnolda G, Wright IM, Foster JP, Henderson-Smart DJ. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for infants with respiratory distress in non tertiary care centers: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):509-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0775. Erratum In: Pediatrics.2008 Jun;121(6): 1301. — View Citation

Chisti MJ, Duke T, Ahmed T, Shahunja KM, Shahid ASMSB, G. FAS, et al. The Use of Bubble CPAP and Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Children with Severe Pneumonia and Hypoxemia: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Bangladesh Crit Care J. 2014; 2:71-8

Chisti MJ, Salam MA, Smith JH, Ahmed T, Pietroni MA, Shahunja KM, Shahid AS, Faruque AS, Ashraf H, Bardhan PK, Sharifuzzaman, Graham SM, Duke T. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure for children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in Bangladesh: an open, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Sep 12;386(9998):1057-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60249-5. Epub 2015 Aug 19. — View Citation

Courtney SE, Kahn DJ, Singh R, Habib RH. Bubble and ventilator-derived nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: work of breathing and gas exchange. J Perinatol. 2011 Jan;31(1):44-50. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.55. Epub 2010 Apr 15. — View Citation

Daga S, Mhatre S, Borhade A, Khan D. Home-made continuous positive airways pressure device may reduce mortality in neonates with respiratory distress in low-resource setting. J Trop Pediatr. 2014 Oct;60(5):343-7. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu023. Epub 2014 Apr 23. — View Citation

Duke T, Peel D, Graham S, Howie S, Enarson PM, Jacobson R. Oxygen concentrators: a practical guide for clinicians and technicians in developing countries. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2010;30(2):87-101. doi: 10.1179/146532810X12637745452356. — View Citation

Duke T, Tamburlini G, Silimperi D; Paediatric Quality Care Group. Improving the quality of paediatric care in peripheral hospitals in developing countries. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Jul;88(7):563-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.7.563. No abstract available. Erratum In: Arch Dis Child. 2003 Oct;88(10):946. — View Citation

Duke T. CPAP: a guide for clinicians in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014 Feb;34(1):3-11. doi: 10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000102. Epub 2013 Dec 6. — View Citation

Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. Integrated Management of Newborn and Childhood Illness, Part 1 Blended Learning Module for the Health Extension Programme

Graham SM, English M, Hazir T, Enarson P, Duke T. Challenges to improving case management of childhood pneumonia at health facilities in resource-limited settings. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 May;86(5):349-55. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.048512. — View Citation

Kinikar A, Kulkarni R, Valvi C, Gupte N. Use of indigenous bubble CPAP during swine flu pandemic in Pune, India. Indian J Pediatr. 2011 Oct;78(10):1216-20. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0389-x. Epub 2011 Mar 26. — View Citation

Koti J, Murki S, Gaddam P, Reddy A, Reddy MD. Bubble CPAP for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Indian Pediatr. 2010 Feb;47(2):139-43. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0021-6. Epub 2009 May 20. — View Citation

Koyamaibole L, Kado J, Qovu JD, Colquhoun S, Duke T. An evaluation of bubble-CPAP in a neonatal unit in a developing country: effective respiratory support that can be applied by nurses. J Trop Pediatr. 2006 Aug;52(4):249-53. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi109. Epub 2005 Dec 2. — View Citation

Liptsen E, Aghai ZH, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Long J, Steele AM, Habib RH, Courtney SE. Work of breathing during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a comparison of bubble vs variable-flow devices. J Perinatol. 2005 Jul;25(7):453-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211325. — View Citation

Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Mathers C, Black RE. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):430-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6. Epub 2014 Sep 30. Erratum In: Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):420. Lancet. 2016 Jun 18;387(10037):2506. — View Citation

McKiernan C, Chua LC, Visintainer PF, Allen H. High flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.039. Epub 2009 Dec 29. — View Citation

Rahman AE, Moinuddin M, Molla M, Worku A, Hurt L, Kirkwood B, Mohan SB, Mazumder S, Bhutta Z, Raza F, Mrema S, Masanja H, Kadobera D, Waiswa P, Bahl R, Zangenberg M, Muhe L; Persistent Diarrhoea Research Group. Childhood diarrhoeal deaths in seven low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Sep 1;92(9):664-71. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.134809. Epub 2014 Jun 23. — View Citation

Schibler A, Pham TM, Dunster KR, Foster K, Barlow A, Gibbons K, Hough JL. Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Med. 2011 May;37(5):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2177-5. Epub 2011 Mar 3. — View Citation

Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, Pandit A, Patole S. A pilot study of comparison of BCPAP vs. VCPAP in preterm infants with early onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. 2010 Jun;56(3):191-4. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmp092. Epub 2009 Oct 20. — View Citation

UNICEF. Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed. Progress Report 2015 2015

van den Heuvel M, Blencowe H, Mittermayer K, Rylance S, Couperus A, Heikens GT, Bandsma RH. Introduction of bubble CPAP in a teaching hospital in Malawi. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2011;31(1):59-65. doi: 10.1179/1465328110Y.0000000001. — View Citation

Wilson PT, Morris MC, Biagas KV, Otupiri E, Moresky RT. A randomized clinical trial evaluating nasal continuous positive airway pressure for acute respiratory distress in a developing country. J Pediatr. 2013 May;162(5):988-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.022. Epub 2012 Nov 16. — View Citation

Yagui AC, Vale LA, Haddad LB, Prado C, Rossi FS, Deutsch AD, Rebello CM. Bubble CPAP versus CPAP with variable flow in newborns with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011 Nov-Dec;87(6):499-504. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2145. — View Citation

You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Idele P, Hogan D, Mathers C, Gerland P, New JR, Alkema L; United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2275-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8. Epub 2015 Sep 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2256. — View Citation

* Note: There are 24 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Length of hospital stay in days	Length of hospital stay will be measured and reported in days.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)
Other	Incidence of nasal trauma, gastric distention, shock and air leaks in number	Incidence of nasal trauma, gastric distention, shock and air leaks will be measured in number and reported in percentage.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)
Other	Duration of bCPAP in hour	Duration of bCPAP will be measured and reported in hour/hours.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)
Other	Acceptability of bCPAP by nurses and physicians will be measured in number and reported in percentage	Acceptability of bCPAP by nurses and physicians will be measured in number and reported in percentage.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)
Primary	For stage I and II feasibility and acceptability of bubble CPAP in two tertiary and two district hospitals will be measured in number and reported in percentage	Patient level and health professional level challenge is the outcome of phase I and II. All will be measured in number and reported in percentage. For stage I and II: Primary outcome: operational challenges that may include availability of pulse oxymetry, IV cannula, IV antibiotics, oxygen supply system and nasal catheters for treating severe pneumonia Secondary outcomes: prevalence of severe pneumonia associated hypoxemia, their treatment practices, adverse events, mortality and treatment failure	7 months
Primary	For stage III: Primary outcome: Treatment failure	According to this protocol treatment failure will be declared if the following criteria are met: A. Presence of severe hypoxemia (SpO2<85%) at any time after at least one hour of intervention plus severe respiratory distress when the child is receiving BCPAP/LF OR, B. If the patient developed the indication of mechanical ventilation when the child is receiving BCPAP/LF OR, C. If the patient died during hospitalization OR, D. If the patient left against medical advice (LAMA) due to lack of improvement or deterioration of the child during hospitalization; All will be measured in number and reported in percentage.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)
Secondary	Secondary outcomes: • Death • Adverse events (pneumothorax, abdominal distension, nasal trauma, aspiration pneumonia ) encountered	All will be measured in number and reported in percentage.	12-18 months (Mid April 2021 to Mid October 2022)