View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:This is a single center, prospective, biomarker-result-blinded observational study evaluating immunoassay measurements of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) performed on Abionic's abioSCOPE device with the PSP assay on generally healthy adults representative of the US population.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate an effectiveness of the drug Dalargin in combination with Leitragin for the prevention and treatment of severe pulmonary complications symptoms associated with severe and critical coronavirus infection cases (SARS COVID19, expanded as Severe acute respiratory syndrome Cоrona Virus Disease 2019 ). Test drugs that will be administered to patients are: - Leitragin, solution for inhalation administration, - Dalargin, solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration.
Although norepinephrine is commonly used and is the recommended agent for the treatment of hypotension in volume-resuscitated hyperdynamic septic shock, Low doses of vasopressin may be added to norepinephrine to maintain arterial blood pressure in refractory septic shock and to decrease exposure to norepinephrine. The aim of the work is to compare the effect of norepinephrine alone and Norepinephrine/vasopressin combination on hemodynamics and tissue perfusion in septic shock patients.
Non-interventional, prospective, monocentric study on the exploration of leukocyte morphological parameters according to the infectious condition and response to corticosteroid therapy of septic patients.
Sepsis is defined by the occurrence of critical organ dysfunction in the context of infection. Unfortunately, its incidence appears to be rising, and the mortality of septic shock remains extraordinary high (> 60%). Death in sepsis arises from shock and multi organ dysfunction that are - at least in part - triggered by an inadequate response of the host's immune system to the infection. Given the injurious role of 1) this overwhelming immune response and 2) the consumption of protective plasmatic factors (e.g. vWF cleaving proteases, hemostatic factors etc.) while the disease is progressing the investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the most severely ill individuals might improve hemodynamics, oxygenation and ultimately survival. This therapeutic strategy combines 2 major aspects in 1 procedure: 1. removal of harmful circulating molecules and 2. replacement of protective plasma proteins. The investigators designed the EXCHANGE trial to analyze in a randomized fashion the benefit of TPE as an add-on treatment to state of the art standard sepsis care. Only patients with early septic shock (< 24 hrs) and high catecholamine doses (norepinephrine > 0.4 ug/kg body weight/min) will be included. Those in the treatment group will receive 1 TPE within 2 hours following randomization. The primary outcome is norepinephrine dose 6 hrs after randomization. The recruitment period is 2 years and will be performed at the Hannover medical School University hospital in Germany. Secondary endpoints (including organ dysfunction as well as biochemical markers of inflammation and coagulation) will be assessed on day 1-8 and day 28 after TPE. The investigators hope to demonstrate a potential benefit of an additive treatment approach to improve the outcome of patients suffering from septic shock.
The benefits of fever treatment in critically ill patients remains unclear. The aim of the prospective, randomized clinical trial was to verify the hypothesis that the administration of ibuprofen in order to decrease the fever in septic patients without limited cardiorespiratory reserve leads to decreasing their prognosis.
Prospective, experimental, longitudinal cohort study in septic patients treated at ER and ICU at General Hospital Zone 11 IMSS Piedras Negras Coahuila. Interventions, will be implementd in 2 consecutive periods of 6 months Phase 1: 6 months period, septic patients treated only with standard treatment. Phase 2: 6 months period, septic patients treated with Vitamin C, Thiamine, Cyanocobalamine, Pyridoxine and Hydrocortisone + standard treatment.
At present, there is conflicting evidence regarding outcomes in patients with septic shock receiving weight-based vasopressor (WBVP) versus non-weight-based vasopressor (NWBVP) dosing strategies. At MCMC, a weight-based strategy is in place whereas MDMC, MMMC and MRMC currently utilize a non-weight-based dosing strategy. Obese patients (BMI > 30) receiving either strategy may potentially be receiving substantially more or less vasopressor exposure compared to their non-obese (BMI < 30) counterparts. Determining total vasopressor exposure and assessing clinical outcomes would benefit our institution and others by providing optimal vasopressor dosing strategies in obese and non-obese patients. There is a difference in clinical outcomes between patients receiving weight-based and non-weight-based vasopressor dosing strategies. There is a difference in total vasopressor exposure between obese and non-obese patients utilizing WBVP and NWBVP strategies.
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of low dose iloprost versus placebo for 72-hours, in up to a total of 380 patients with septic shock suffering from organ failure. The study hypothesis is that iloprost may be beneficial as an endothelial rescue treatment as it is anticipated to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity in septic shock patients suffering from organ failure caused by endothelial breakdown, ultimately improving survival.
Due to the high incidence, mortality and short and long term complications of sepsis and septic shock, it is necessary to look for strategies to try to minimize this impact.