View clinical trials related to Scar.
Filter by:Study to validate the safety and efficacy of the Hyaluronic Acid +Collagen filler 20 patients will undergo through 3 visits one to asses the health and apply the filler one after 4 weeks to check the results one after 16 weeks for the final check and results validation Safety assessed with analysis of the Adverse Events
An RCT will be set up to compare outcomes between two groups of hand surgery patients. These are: • Emergency hand surgery patients - randomized to either absorbable or non-absorbable suture. The primary outcomes investigated will be: • Infection occurrence The secondary outcomes will be: - Scar appearance at 1 week and 6-8 weeks (assessed from photographs and scar scoring scale) - Wound inflammation as a percentage of wound length at day 7 post surgery. - Patient symptoms at 1 week (assessed from patient questionnaire) - Patient symptoms at 6-8 weeks (assessed from patient questionnaire) - QDASH Score at 1 week (assessed from patient questionnaire) - QDASH score at 6-8 weeks (assessed from patient questionnaire) - Occurrence of other complications (assessed from the above photographs, the above questionnaires and from nurse and doctor led reports of wound breakdown and other complications)
This study will compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, electrocautery, and pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade (PPB) for the initial skin incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction. It is hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in mastectomy scar cosmesis. The purpose and objectives of this study are: 1. To evaluate and compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery, or PEAK PlasmaBlade for initial incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction. 2. To inform future equipment choices for breast surgery including potential elimination of scalpels and their attendant risks.
This study aims to determine whether microneedling or dermabrasion in the early post-operative period is superior in improving the appearance of surgical scars on the face.
Assess the efficacy of fractional ablative CO2 therapy combined with topical steroids in HS patients with Hurley stage I or stage II disease. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, oftentimes debilitating inflammatory skin condition that presents with painful lesions in intertriginous areas of the body. The reported prevalence of HS in the U.S. is around 1-4%. Medical therapies, which typically consist of topical or systemic antibiotics, hormone- regulating drugs, and immunomodulators, are initially used to control the disease but HS can be recalcitrant to these modalities in the long-term. Optimizing management of mild-moderate HS is crucial to prevent disease progression and improve patients' quality of life.
Reliable scar assessment is essential not only when designing clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of new and existing scar therapies, but also in everyday, clinical practice, to examine the progress of our patients' care. Subjective assessments are extremely important; they demonstrate to the patient the changes and improvements in their scars since the primary burn injury. Nevertheless, clinicians require reliable, validated, and objective tools which can yield measurable and reproducible outcomes. These are ultimately needed to achieve the goal of reducing the physical and psychosocial burden of scarring through compelling research. Previously, a pilot study (BOSS-1) was conducted in 55 patients with post burn hypertrophic scars. The investigators measured, among other parameters, scar thickness, density, and pliability, using a panel of objective scar assessment tools, alongside standard subjective measurements (questionnaire-based), and skin biopsy assessments. Measurements were performed at a single time point which varied from 3 months to 6 years post burn injury. This work indicated that measuring scar thickness, pliability and colour together, may provide a global scar objective score. BOSS-2 is a multi-centre study that will validate the preliminary findings in BOSS-1.
The purpose of this study is to determine overall patient satisfaction with their cesarean section scar with application of Steri-strips vs. Dermabond following subcuticular skin closure of pfannenstiel incision
The overarching goal of this research is to assess whether the post-operative use of closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) accelerates healing of surgical wounds, improves surgical outcomes, and reduces the rate of local complications in high-risk, obese, post-bariatric patients undergoing abdominal body-contouring procedures (abdominal panniculectomy or "abdominoplasty") compared to standard wound care. The investigators postulate that ciNPT can cost-effectively improve outcomes and standard of post-surgical care in this specific category of patients. This hypothesis will be tested through a prospective, interventional, case-control, randomized clinical trial.
This intervention, called MMP®, is a procedure whereby drugs are injected through tattoo machines.
Tendon adhesions of the hand remain a ubiquitous problem facing hand surgeons and hand therapists alike. Despite their commonality, no consensus exists as to the best means of preventing adhesions, or the most ideal methods to treat them once they have occurred. The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes after standard operative tenolysis performed for adhesions of the hand to outcomes after tenolysis with the use of allograft human amniotic membrane.