View clinical trials related to Scar.
Filter by:This study will look at silicone tape compared to the current no dressing standard at the investigators institution, to determine if silicone tape provides a significant improvement in post-abdominoplasty scar appearance. Silicone tape will be added to half of the abdominoplasty incision of patients undergoing abdominally-based breast reconstruction procedures two weeks after their operation. They will be followed up and assessed at specific timepoints to determine whether the silicone improves scar outcomes in these patients.
Scarring from burn wounds remains a chronic and often severe sequela of burn injury. Burn wounds may be left to heal by secondary intention or treated with surgical skin grafting; in both circumstances, significant scars likely result. When surgical skin grafting is employed, skin graft harvest sites ("donor sites") likewise result in clinically significant scars. This study will have interventional and observational components. Patients will receive the standard fractional ablative CO2 treatments to their scars resulting from burn wounds allowed to heal by secondary intention and/or those treated with skin grafts. These will be prospectively observed for the duration of the study as well as adjacent normal skin. In addition, a donor site that meets inclusion criteria that would not have otherwise received LSR will be identified as a treatment site. Patients with have one half of their donor sites randomized to standard of care (SOC) treatment, which consists of wound dressings, compression therapy, physical and occupational therapies and the other half randomized to SOC + ablative fractional CO2 laser therapy (LSR).
Hypertrophic scar is an inevitable outcome of wound repair. It affects the appearance and some scar contracture often leads to joint dysfunction.Patients have low quality of life, long treatment cycle, heavy social burden and high medical costs.Skin grafting is currently the gold standard for scar repair.However, there are often insufficient skin sources, easy to scar recurrence, lack of skin accessory organs.The application of composite skin graft can reduce the recurrence rate of scar healing and relieve the deficiency of skin source.However, its survival rate is not high, and acellular allogeneic dermal scaffolds are expensive, heavy medical burden.Therefore, how to effectively repair the wound surface after surgical excision of scar is the main problem to be solved urgently. Dermal loss is the main cause of unsatisfactory scar repair and recurrence.The previous clinical study of the research group found that the application of autologous epidermal basal cells and autologous skin graft obtained in real time during the operation could effectively improve the survival rate of skin graft in the treatment of wound surface (Brit J Surg, 2015).Furthermore, it is suggested that the application of autologous scar dermal scaffolds can achieve the control of skin damage in the skin harvesting area and the orthotopic transplantation of autologous scar tissue dermal scaffolds, which can effectively reduce the economic burden of patients.Therefore, the researchers wondered whether the construction of tissue-engineered skin orthotopic transplantation with autologous epidermal basal cells and autologous scar dermal scaffold combined with autologous scar dermal scaffolds to repair the wound after scar resection could improve the survival rate of skin graft and reduce scar recurrence.To this end, we plan to carry out multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials, aiming at proposing more effective surgical treatment guidelines for the repair of hypertrophic scar, improving the survival rate of composite skin graft, and solving the current clinical problems of hypertrophic scar repair.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of Granexin® gel in reducing scar formation in surgical incisional wounds.
The study will evaluate the effect of intradermal injection of stromal vascular fraction into suture line on wound healing and scarring.
The overarching goal of this research is to assess whether the post-operative use of closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) accelerates healing of surgical wounds, improves surgical outcomes, and reduces the rate of local complications in high-risk, obese, post-bariatric patients undergoing abdominal body-contouring procedures (abdominal panniculectomy or "abdominoplasty") compared to standard wound care. The investigators postulate that ciNPT can cost-effectively improve outcomes and standard of post-surgical care in this specific category of patients. This hypothesis will be tested through a prospective, interventional, case-control, randomized clinical trial.
The study will investigate the safety and effectiveness of daily post surgical scar management, using a moisture-balancing base product containing different amounts of a novel (NCE) antifibrogenic compound FS2, a natural metabolite of the kynurenine pathway. Results of recent peer-reviewed, pre-clinical evidence warrant further investigation to validate therapeutic scar preventive efficacy of topically administered/delivered FS2. There are no known safety concerns with current product formulations. Recent Phase I clinical safety and tolerability data further support continuation of the research proposed in this study.
A Phase II prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled and comparative clinical study evaluating hydrogel scar-management modalities for effective management of hyperproliferative scars and keloids. This is a double-blinded study, which means that neither the evaluating physician nor the subject will know which treatment is administered. Group selection and assignment will be made at random, with a 2 in 5 chance of receiving a market-approved therapy, and 1 in 5 chance of receiving the placebo. Subjects assigned the placebo-moisturizer will receive a standard hypoallergenic dermatological hydrating cream base. Subjects assigned the silicone gel, will receive a commercially available, active comparator.
The pilot study is prospective, randomized, double-blinded, with intra-subject comparisons against a vehicle control. The primary objective of this pilot study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new wound care product formulated to improve healing outcome, minimize complications of impaired healing and minimize the appearance of scars. This pilot study is double-blinded, which means that neither the evaluating physician nor the subject will know which treatment is administered. Subjects' with 2 comparable excision sites will be randomly assigned to use the FS2 restorative wound care product on one excision site and a vehicle formulation of the product on the other. At the discretion of the Principal Investigator, a sutured wound may be bisected for intra-wound comparison of treatments. In all cases, after application of either vehicle or FS2, a layer of petrolatum will be applied to cover the wound site as a standard of care.
This intervention, called MMP®, is a procedure whereby drugs are injected through tattoo machines.