View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:The investigators compared oxygen therapy using the HFNC and diffuser mask (an effective low-flow oxygen delivery system) to treat patients with moderate-to-severe acute bronchiolitis admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).
Pathophysiological changes influenced by multiple factors in critically ill patients, has a significant impact on pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cisatracurium. In order to understand better and find an appropriate dosing regimen, the purpose of this study is to investigate the PK and PD of a loading dose cisatracurium in critically ill patients. Cisatracurium, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), are commonly used in intensive care units because of a lesser effect on hemodynamic parameters and a reduction in mortality rate in ARDS patients. Loading dose recommended in clinical practice guidelines for sustained neuromuscular blockade in the adult critically ill patient is 0.1-0.2 mg/kg. Then, maintenance dose of 1-3 mcg/kg/min is followed regarding indications, such as ARDS. However, this recommended loading dose might not be adequate in critically ill patients, the study in this specific population might be needed.
Ventilator hyperinflation (VHI) has been shown to be effective in improving respiratory mechanics, secretion removal, and gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients; however, there are no recommendations on the best ventilator settings to perform the technique. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare six modes of VHI, concerning physiological markers of efficacy and safety criteria, in order to support the optimal VHI settings selection for mechanically ventilated patients. In a randomized, controlled and crossover study, 30 mechanically ventilated patients underwent 6 modes of ventilator hyperinflation. The maximum expansion (tidal volume), expiratory flow bias criteria (inspiratory and expiratory flow patterns), overdistension (alveolar pressure), asynchronies and hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were assessed during the interventions.
The purpose of the present project is to compare High-Flow Nasal Oxygen therapy with Standard Oxygen therapy, initiated in the prehospital setting in patients with acute hypoxemia respiratory failure, in terms of oxygenation at arrival to the hospital and need of mechanical ventilation during the subsequent 28 days
Mortality of acute hypoxic - hypercapnic respiratory failure (ARF) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation is demonstrated to be higher than in patients who underwent only non invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). There is an increased need to detect more predictive factors for NIV failure, in order to better identify patients most at risk of facing negative outcomes. The aim of this experimental pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of the ultrasound of diaphragm in ARF patients underwent non invasive mechanical ventilation ( primary endpoint ). Furthermore the secondary aim is to observe any relationship between diaphragmatic function (excursion), diaphragmatic thickening and the timing of arterial blood gases (ABGs) compensation in patients with ARF undergoing NIV treatment; additional outcomes are: correlation with dyspnea level, time of mechanical ventilation, NIV failure, rate of tracheostomy, length of stay in ICU and in-hospital and 90-day mortality.
Invasive mechanical ventilation is common in the medical intensive care unit, and the period of time following extubation remains high risk as 11 to 15% of patients require reintubation after their first extubation. Reintubation is associated with increased rates of nosocomial infection and is an independent predictor of mortality. Non-invasive ventilation and high flow nasal cannula are the only therapies that have been shown to reduce the rate of reintubation. Recent clinical trials suggest that all patients might benefit from some form of post-extubation respiratory support, but use of these therapies in usual care remains low. PROPER is a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial comparing a respiratory therapist driven protocol to provide post-extubation respiratory support to all patients, compared to usual care. The trial will enroll patients undergoing extubation in the Medical ICU at Vanderbilt from October 2017 until March 2019. The primary outcome will be reintubation within 96 hours.
The investigators propose to conduct a feasibility, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in adult critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube as part of their treatment for respiratory failure. Participants will be allocated to either a normal blood oxygen target group or a lower than normal blood oxygen target group. The primary purpose of the study will be to assess the feasibility of recruiting complex patients who lack capacity into a clinical trial in which oxygenation is being assessed, and that the clinicians responsible for these patients are able to deliver the intervention effectively. The safety of using a lower than normal blood oxygen target will also be assessed and blood samples taken for subsequent investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying the observed changes. Participants will be randomised (1:1) into either an intervention or control group. The intervention in this trial is tightly controlled administration of oxygen to patients to achieve a haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 88-92%. The control group will also have tightly controlled oxygen administration, but to achieve an SpO2 of 96% or above. The target for the control group represents a normal SpO2, whilst that in the intervention group is lower than what is considered to be normal. It should be noted that although lower than normal, this SpO2 is close to what the general public experience when travelling by pressurised aircraft as the fractional inspired oxygen concentration in that situation is only 0.15-0.17 (15-17%). The controlled oxygen administration would commence as soon as possible after admission to the critical care unit and end following removal of the participant's artificial breathing tube. The researchers and clinical team cannot be blinded to treatment allocation, due to the nature of the intervention. Those analysing the data will be blinded to the intervention.
High flow oxygen therapy has been applied after extubation in cardiac surgery patients with uncertain efficacy. The current authors plan to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled study of nasal high flow therapy (NHF) application with high (60L/min) or low flow (40L/min) oxygen mixture administration versus standard oxygen treatment (Venturi mask) after extubation of patients undergoing elective or non-elective cardiac surgery.
Diagnosis of pneumonia remains difficult in intensive care unit (ICU), notably after cardiac surgery. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been successfully used for diagnosis of pneumonia, but its usefulness and reliability was never evaluated after cardiac surgery. This study investigates the clinical relevance of LUS for pneumonia diagnoses in cardiac ICU.
Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a life-threatening emergency which occurs due to impaired gas exchange. In the US, the number of hospitalisations owing to acute respiratory failure was 1,917,910 in the year 2009.(1) The incidence of ARF requiring hospitalization was 137.1 per 100,000 population.(2) In ARF due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiogenic pulmonary edema, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be beneficial. NIV also has several advantages over invasive mechanical ventilation. These include, avoidance of endotracheal intubation and its attendant complications like airway injury, nosocomial infections, and possibly shorter duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.(3, 4) The success of NIV depends on several factors like the etiology of the respiratory failure, careful monitoring by the treating physician, and also adequate cooperation of patient. Better synchrony of the patient's spontaneous breaths with the ventilator-delivered breaths may lead to better patient cooperation and thereby, better clinical outcomes. Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) leads to dyspnea, increased work of breathing, and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation.(5) Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is one of the commonest mode used during NIV. In a prospective multicenter observational study, severe asynchrony (defined as an asynchrony index of >10 %) was seen in 43% of patients of patients with ARF ventilated by NIV with the conventional PSV mode.(6) Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) is new mode of ventilation which utilizes the electrical activity of the diaphragm to deliver the breath.(7) During NAVA, breath is delivered when the patient's diaphragm starts contracting. Further, the amount of pressure support given during the breath is proportional to the strength of the electrical signal from the diaphragm. Finally, NAVA also terminates the breath when the electrical activity of the diaphragm wanes. NAVA has been shown to avoid over-assistance, decrease intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and minimize wasted efforts.(8) Hence, NAVA may play a major role in improving patient-ventilator synchrony. In a pooled analysis of studies comparing NAVA with PSV during NIV, it was shown that the use of NAVA significantly improved patient-ventilator synchrony.(9) However, so far, no clinical trial has demonstrated that this improvement in synchrony translates into better clinical outcomes. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we intend to compare the rates of NIV failure and mortality between NAVA and PSV in subjects with acute respiratory failure managed with NIV.