View clinical trials related to Respiratory Failure.
Filter by:Patients with infections in their blood often become very sick. These patients are usually put in an intensive care unit for careful observation and treatment. These patients may develop a low blood pressure, lung failure, and kidney failure. When these problems develop, care becomes quite complicated. Patients with lung failure often need help with a breathing machine to make certain that the breathing is adequate. The machine helps keep the oxygen level high enough for healthy tissues. When patients are placed on the machine for breathing they require a tube to be placed into lungs. This can be quite uncomfortable. These patients need sedation to help them tolerate the uncomfortable breathing tube and other parts of their routine necessary care. This study will compare two drugs (dexmedetomidine and propofol) which are frequently used for sedation in intensive care patients. Clinical studies suggest that these drugs are both effective and safe. The main question is whether or not one of the drugs is better in a patient with a blood infection. This study will try to determine that. Our main goal is to see whether or not patients on one particular drug come off the breathing machine faster than patients on the other drug. These drugs are not experimental drugs and are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. There is no placebo drug being used in this study. All patients in this study will receive the best possible care based on their medical condition.
Shock and respiratory failure are common reasons for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) at our institution. The various causes of acute shock and respiratory failure are traditionally assessed with the use of history, physical examination, chest x-ray, EKG and laboratory studies. Unfortunately, much of this clinical information is either insensitive or non-specific. 1 Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) is a rapid and non-invasive tool, which has been shown to be useful in the intensive care unit to assist in the diagnosis and management of patients in shock or respiratory failure.2 The investigators hypothesize that the trained fellow's interpretation of critical care ultrasound images will be accurate when compared to experts and that ultrasounds will change diagnosis and management of the patient in shock and respiratory failure.
The aims of the study are to: 1. Implement a telemonitoring programme in heart failure and obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) /chronic respiratory patients by assessing the real world impact of on readmissions, consults, home visits, quality of life and economic endpoints. 2. Explore the effects of telemonitoring across heart and respiratory groups with respect to i) factors that influence how patients integrate telemonitoring into their daily routines and self care behaviour and ii) how healthcare professionals use telemonitoring to aid decision- making. 3. Understand the impact of telemonitoring on a variety of care pathways.
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is one of common clinical critically diseases. In the United States, the incidence of ARDS reaches 31%, which is one of the main causes of death in patients. There is no unified treatment process for ARDS currently and the treatment measures are not yet standardized, so the standardization of ARDS treatment processes is needed to reduce mortality in patients. Following the evidence-based medicine principles and six-step treatment standards of ARDS, this study uses the method of multi-center randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the standardized treatment process of ARDS, which provides the basis for the standardized treatment of ARDS.
Mechanical ventilation permits to support the work of breathing in case of respiratory failure, but therapy also has many side effects. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), which delivers the ventilatory assist via a face mask or nasal canula, permits to decrease these complications. However, NIV is not always successful and half of children in respiratory failure finally require invasive ventilation. A major cause of NIV failure is the ventilator inability to detect patient efforts. The new ventilatory mode NAVA (neurally adjusted ventilatory assist) improves the detection of patient efforts during mechanical ventilation. The hypothesis of this study is that NAVA improves synchrony during pediatric NIV and therefore permits to unload the patient ventilatory efforts.
The purpose of this multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial is to determine the effect of a strategy using routine nebulisation of mucolytics and bronchodilators (four times daily) as compared to a strategy using nebulisation of mucolytics or bronchodilators only on clinical indication (i.e. occurrence of persistent thick and tenacious sputum or bronchospasm) in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients. The investigators will examine the effects in terms of ventilator-free days, defined as the number of days alive and free of ventilation at day 28 after start of ventilation. We hypothesize that a strategy that uses nebulisation of mucolytics or bronchodilators only on clinical indication not to be inferior to a strategy using preventive nebulisation of mucolytics or bronchodilators with regard to the number of ventilator free days in ICU patients at day 28.
Mechanical ventilation is a vital therapeutic support, widely used in pediatric intensive care. Invasive ventilation (IV) is associated with risk of major complications ( nosocomial pneumonia, secondary pulmonary barotrauma injuries, pneumothorax) , which can increase : the duration of ventilation, mortality, length of ICU stay and health costs. The practitioner should ask the benefit of the continuation of this IV daily and adapting it, to limit complications. The evaluation of the work of breathing is a key element in understanding the pathophysiology of respiratory distress but is also a key element in improving the management of ventilatory support and the adjustment of ventilatory parameters . It has been shown that there is an increased work of breathing in all children admitted in ICU for clinical acute respiratory distress that is significantly reduced by ventilatory support. There is probably a relationship that should be proportional between the work of breathing ( PTP ) resulting in respiratory request triggered by the respiratory drive and the electrical activity of the diaphragm ( Edi ) . The validation of this correlation PTP / Edi has a direct impact on the monitoring of ventilated patients with the ability to monitor the physiological factor while maintaining a classical treatment of children by simply monitoring Edi without additional invasive device .
Intraoperative intravenous fluid management practice varies greatly between anesthesiologists. Postoperative fluid based weight gain is associated with major morbidity. Postoperative respiratory complications are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and hospital costs. The literature shows conflicting data regarding intraoperative fluid resuscitation volume. No large-scale studies have focused on intraoperative fluid management and postoperative respiratory dysfunction. Hypotheses: Primary - Liberal intraoperative fluid resuscitation is associated with an increased risk of 30 day mortality Secondary - Liberal intraoperative fluid resuscitation is associated with increased likelihood of postoperative respiratory failure, pulmonary edema, reintubation, atelectasis, acute kidney injury and peri-extubation oxygen desaturation.
Background There is no unanimous opinion about a lung-protective strategy in cardiac surgery. Small randomized clinical and animals trials suggest that ventilation during cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) could be protective on the lungs. This evidence is based on surrogate end-points and most of studies are limited to elective coronary surgery. According to the available data, an optimal strategy of lung protection during CPB cannot be recommended. The purpose of the CPBVENT study is to investigate the effectiveness of different ventilation strategies during CPB on post-operative pulmonary complications. Trial design The CPBVENT study will be a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. We are going to enroll 780 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with planned use of CPB, aortic cross-clamping and two lung ventilation. Patients will be randomized into three treatment groups: 1) no ventilation during CPB; 2) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O during CPB; 3) ventilation with 5 acts/minute with tidal volume of 2-3 ml/Kg and a PEEP of 3-5 cmH2O during CPB. The primary end-point will be the incidence of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 until the time of discharge from the ICU. The secondary end-points will be the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications and 30-days mortality. Patients will be followed-up to 12 months after the date of randomization. Summary The CPBVENT Trial will determine whether different ventilation strategies during CPB will improve pulmonary outcome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Respiratory failure is the main death cause in neuromuscular diseases. Non-invasive and volitional measures of inspiratory muscles strength include the nasal pressure with an occluded nostril (Psnip) and the maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax). Unfortunately, volitional maneuvers depend of patient effort. The aim of this research is to validate a non-invasive and non-volitional technique to evaluate diaphragm strength at neuromuscular diseases patients. The methodology consists to add to PImax and Psnip measures 5 phrenic nerves magnetical stimulation maneuvers (Pstim).Stimulations will be realize at 3 inspiratory pression levels (0, -1 cm H2O and -5 cm H2O).