View clinical trials related to Resection Margin.
Filter by:This monocentric early feasibility first in human study is intended to evaluate safety and performance of intraoperative detection of light signals during electrosurgical breast cancer resection. In consequence the data should also be taken to adapt technical features according to the findings. The study results will be utilized to design and to calculate the sample size for future pivotal studies after finalizing this study and to adapt the technical features of the system and/ or device. In the future pivotal study, the effectiveness of method and the reduction in R1 resection rate will be assessed with the final goal to provide continuous or real-time information about the tissue type that is currently cut. The primary endpoint for this first in human feasibility study is the percentage of patients with no serious adverse event related to the investigational device. After signing the informed consent the doctor and research team will determine if the participant meets all requirements for this study. During the second visit (V2) they will receive the treatment procedure with the investigational medical device (IMD). The follow up visit (V3) will be performed up to 7 days after the treatment procedure at the day of discharge from the hospital.
A prospective multicenter randomized non-inferiority clinical trial, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.0 cm-safety margin surgery, compared with 1.5 cm safety margin surgery for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer Summary: A current standard primary treatment for oral tongue cancer is a curative surgical resection with/without adjuvant radiation treatments (or chemoradiation). In pathological analysis of surgical specimens, more than 5 mm of non-tumorous tissues from the tumor border is regarded as a safe negative resection margin, according to the NCCN guideline (the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Dec 10. 2020). To achieve this clear margin, surgeons are apt to use a 1.0 to 1.5 cm safety margin around the gross tumor during surgery, considering 30-50% tumor shrinkage in tissue fixation process. Many previous retrospective data have been reported to suggest the optimal or proper surgical extent for oral tongue cancer. Wider resection can lead to better local control, however, it sacrifices more normal tissue, resulting in the functional deficit of tongue (speech and swallowing), even with reconstruction. Unfortunately up to now, no prospective comparison of a different surgical safety margin for oral tongue cancer have been conducted to draw a more solid conclusion. Particularly in early stage oral tongue cancer (cT1-2N0), some study results have suggested that less than 5 mm resection margin in pathology specimens can be also safe and effective in terms of tumor control. To achieve a well-grounded result about the proper surgical safety margin in early stage (cT1-2N0) oral tongue cancer, we will compare the outcomes of the two (1.5 cm versus 1.0 cm) surgical safety margin in curative resection for cT1-2N0 oral tongue cancer.