View clinical trials related to Renal Insufficiency.
Filter by:Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) are physically inactive, resulting in poor physical function and reduced quality of life. The aim of this pilot trial was to test the study feasibility of a combined resistance and cardiovascular exercise program (recruitment and retention rates) and report adherence and adverse events. The intervention (I) group received monthly exercise physiologist consultations, exercise prescription (resistance and aerobic exercise program using exercise bands) and weekly phone calls over 12 weeks. Control (C) group received normal care. Feasibility outcomes were exercise adherence rates and adverse events. Secondary measures included physical function measures and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-driven nurse-led self-management intervention program compared to standard usual care in people with CKD stages 3-4 on CKD knowledge, self-management behavior, self-efficacy and HRQoL using valid and reliable instruments in Malaysia.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of linzagolix in subjects with varying degrees of impaired renal function compared to matched control subjects with normal renal function
The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of mitochondrial derived oxidative stress on exercise capacity and arterial hemodynamics in HFpEF patients with and without chronic kidney disease.
Background: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (1,25-OHD) as well as mineral bone metabolism modulators like sclerostin are thought to play an important role in in diabetic patients with chronic renal failure. The present study aimed to analyse the levels of serum sclerostin before and after hemodialysis which is a primary element of treatment in such combined disease states. Methods: Serum sclerostin concentrations were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit with 56 individuals who 14 chronic hemodialysis patients with diabetes, 14 chronic hemodialysis patients with non-diabetes and 28 healthy volunteers as a control group.
Individuals with kidney failure are kept alive using dialysis machines designed to remove toxic substances and excess fluid from the blood. Standard dialysis is undertaken three times a week at a dialysis unit, supported by a team of specialist dialysis nurses (so called in-centre haemodiafiltration or ICHDF). Each session lasts approximately 4 hours, during which time the fluid and toxins which have built up since the last session of treatment are removed from the blood. The rapid removal of fluid that takes place using this technique often causes unpleasant symptoms such as cramps and dizziness, as well as a "hangover", which may last several hours. It can also cause problems with the heart in the long-term. In recent years, individuals requiring dialysis have been able to choose between standard ICHDF or having haemodialysis at home (HHD) using a convenient table top machine called NxStage System One. This device is used more frequently than in ICHDF and for shorter sessions. As a result, the amount of fluid removed during each session is less than with ICHDF. This may be beneficial to the heart, but may also make these individuals feel generally better, which may make them want to be more physically active. It may also reduce the time taken to recover from any symptoms experienced after dialysis. Over a 12 month period, markers of heart damage (using blood tests and scans of the heart) in patients receiving frequent HHD will be studied and the results will be compared with a group of patients receiving ICHDF. The study will also compare any symptoms they may have, how fit they are, how physically active they are and how well they sleep. In addition, the investigators will assess how well fluid balance is maintained in each group and measure the changes in their remaining kidney function during this time.
This study aims to demonstrate the possible benefit of a treatment based on double diuretic in patients with chronic kidney disease and severely impaired glomerular filtration rate. This is based on previous observations where the investigators found that volume overload is a frequent condition within this population and is strongly linked to an increase in morbidity and mortality. The investigators consider that this therapy could be beneficial given that most of these patients are treated with loop diuretics, however, with the passage of time, adaptive changes in the distal nephron occur that promote a decrease in the treatment effect. In this sense, thiazide diuretics at appropriate doses could 'break' the resistance, since their mechanism of action antagonizes the resistance mechanism. Unfortunately, to this day, this treatment has not been fully evaluated. Particularly in this type of population. The investigators developed a study proposed as a double blind randomized clinical trial, where the population will be divided into two groups. A group will be given the standard treatment based on loop diuretic (bumetanide), while the other group will receive the intervention (bumetanide plus chlorthalidone). After a 30-day follow-up period, the results will be measured. With respect to the effectiveness of the treatment, the decrease in volume overload by bioimpedance will be measured. While the occurrence of adverse effects during the same monitoring period will be observed.
This is a proposal for a retrospective observational study of the safety of metformin use in patients with chronic kidney disease, compared to other commonly used diabetes drugs. It will be conducted using retrospective data from the New York City CDRN, Medicare administrate files, and New York State Medicaid administrative files, which will be linked and then deidentified prior to analysis.
Randomized Clinical Trial following the evaluation of the impact on renal function in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with two anesthetics protocols (Desflurane versus Sevoflurane) on the first 24 hours after surgery.
This study was designed to compare the efficacy of BIA and physician adjustment to prevent intradialytic hypotension in patients with acute kidney injury who received renal replacement therapy. The investigators randomized 9 patients with acute kidney injury and volume overloaded who underwent acute hemodialysis for 45 sessions in Vajira hospital between October 2017 and February 2018. In physician adjust-group (control) estimate by physical examination and fluid balance record. Primary outcome was intradialytic hypotensive episode and secondary outcome was hemodialysis-related adverse events and other clinical outcome.