View clinical trials related to Renal Insufficiency.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of renal impairment on pharmacokinetics (PK) of BMS-914143.
We aim to investigate the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to attenuate acute renal dysfunction in patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease undergoing single valve replacement.
Critical ischaemia is pain at rest as the result of poor blood flow and lack of oxygen being delivered to the tissues. It normally affects the hands and feet and can be very debilitating. It is particularly common and difficult to treat in patients with end stage renal failure Patients with renal failure are often high risk of any operative intervention which might help the pain. Often the only treatment options are painkillers. Unfortunately however, the commonly used painkillers, for example morphine, are known to cause worse side effects in patients with renal failure (drowsiness, confusion etc. Qutenza (topical capsaicin 8%) is a new treatment made from chilli peppers which is applied to the skin as a patch and works directly at the nerve endings in the skin to prevent pain. It therefore should not have the systemic side effects of other drugs. It has been demonstrated to be beneficial in other painful conditions for example post-shingles pain and nerve pain from HIV. It has never been used for critical ischaemia before. We propose to investigate the efficacy of Qutenza in treating patients with end stage renal failure and painful ischaemia. We will recruit 20 patients with painful ischaemia and treat them with Qutenza. We will follow them up for 12 weeks and monitor the change in their pain scores.
To investigate the impact of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of ART-123 in patients with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. To investigate the safety of ART-123 in patients with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
Acute renal failure (ARF) is a serious and common complication in hospitalized patients, occurring in more than 25% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Hypomagnesemia is a common disorder, occurring in approximately 12% of hospitalized patients, with an incidence of 60% in ICU patients. The majority of those patients have are asymptomatic hypomagnesemia, and patients with mild hypomagnesemia do not need treatment, only the correction of the underlying cause. Hypomagnesemia potentiates postischemic renal failure in rats, and is associated, in humans, with acute renal failure. To date, there is no study that demonstrated a benefit of maintain normal levels of magnesium in the incidence of ARF in critically ill patients. Thus, we suggest that a treatment aimed to maintain normal magnesium levels during ICU stay can decrease the incidence of ARF. We will perform a randomized clinical trial that will include all patients admitted to an ICU that, develop hypomagnesemia. It will be excluded from the study: patients younger than 18 years, participants from other studies, pregnant women, patients with creatinine greater than or equal to 3.5 mg / dl or on dialysis, patients who used intravenous contrast for radiological studies, patients weighing less than 40kg, suffering from advanced malignant disease, with severe hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium less than or equal to 1.1 mg / dl), with a diagnosis of Torsades de Pointes or symptomatic hypomagnesemia prior to randomization. Patients included in the study will be randomized to one of the following groups: placebo (saline solution 0.9%) or 50% Magnesium Sulfate. Patients will receive an administration of 48 mEq Magnesium diluted in 250 ml saline 0.9% for 24 hours in an infusion rate of 10.4 ml / hr. Therapy will be continued for 3 days, and repeated during ICU stay to maintain magnesium levels in the normal range. Placebo group will receive exactly the same infusion only with saline administration. The therapy will be discontinued if the patient has hypermagnesemia or signs of magnesium intoxication. The main outcome measurement will be the occurrence of ARF during ICU stay.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omarigliptin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate or severe chronic renal insufficiency or end stage renal disease on dialysis with inadequate glycemic control. The primary hypothesis of the study is that omarigliptin compared to placebo produces greater reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) after 24 weeks.
Kidney disease is a common problem after heart transplantation. It may be caused by anti-rejection medications such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus. However, the reason why some people develop kidney problems after a heart transplant, but other people do not, is not fully known. This study plans to learn more about the relationship between a person's genetic make-up (DNA; deoxyribonucleic acid) and the risk of kidney problems after a heart transplant. The long-term goal of this research is to identify genetic variations that may help predict the development of kidney problems after heart transplantation.
The purpose of this multicentric, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation (early vs delayed) has an impact on mortality at 90 days in patients with severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage (according to RIFLE criteria) during the initial phase of septic shock.
A recent therapeutic strategy following renal transplantation includes simultaneous use of reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dosing and maximized use of a non-nephrotoxic, antiproliferative drug (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) or TOR inhibitor), with the goals of reducing/avoiding CNI nephrotoxicity, the incidence of acute rejection, and chronic allograft injury (CAI) (i.e., interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy), leading to more favorable longer-term patient and graft survival.1-7 Early corticosteroid withdrawal has also been used in the attempt to avoid well-known side effects while maintaining favorable patient and graft survival.8-10 While the investigators center and numerous other centers have also included single agent, antibody induction utilizing the lymphodepleting polyclonal antibody rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin (ATG), nondepleting human anti-interleukin-2 receptor (CD25) monoclonal antibody daclizumab (Dac) or basiliximab, or lymphodepleting humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab,11-17 evidence now suggests that an even more effective induction strategy may include the combined use of more than one induction agent (each with fewer doses than if used alone), with the goal of bringing the kidney transplant recipient even closer (through more effectively timed lymphodepletion) to an optimally immunosuppressed state, allowing further reduction in long-term maintenance drug dosing.18-25 The investigators have now successfully used dual ATG/Dac induction therapy in both kidney-alone23-24 and simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation,18-20 and a recent report from the investigators center of kidney-alone and SPK recipients shows that the addition of anti-CD25 to ATG for induction therapy more effectively delays the return of peripheral blood CD25+ cells.25 In the kidney-alone recipient study 3 doses of ATG were combined with 2 doses of Dac for induction,23-24 vs. the investigators previous studies utilizing single agent induction with 7 doses of ATG or 5 doses of Dac.4,16,17 Successful combination of ATG/basiliximab as dual induction in kidney transplantation has also been reported elsewhere,21-22 along with equivalency in clinical outcomes using daclizumab vs. basiliximab.13
Donor-Specific Antibody (DSA) (HLA) levels and non-HLA antibody levels in recipients prior to living kidney transplantation and randomize these individuals into a desensitization protocol in order to evaluate shifts that can occur with the Luminex and XM-One assay after treatment and up to 6 months post transplant. If desensitization is needed prior to transplantation in individuals with a negative crossmatch but positive DSA and/or XM-one - patients will be evaluated clinically with routine lab tests (serum creatinine levels, spot urine protein and spot urine creatinine levels) as well as protocol biopsy evaluations.