Clinical Trials Logo

Regional Anesthesia Morbidity clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Regional Anesthesia Morbidity.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05483647 Completed - Chronic Pain Clinical Trials

ERECTOR SPINE PLANE BLOCK VERSUS LOCAL INFILTRATION ANAESTHESIA FOR TRANSFORAMINAL PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC DISCECTOMY

Start date: January 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The main aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that Erector spine plane block (ESP) with sedation will provide the similar employment of fentanyl and propofol during surgery as an infiltrative local anaesthesia with sedation. The primary endpoint was the quantity of fentanyl and propofol during surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05348421 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Two Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Surgery in Pediatrics

Start date: May 6, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hip joint surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children is extremely painful and associated with considerable postoperative pain despite the use of systemic opioids. Caudal anesthesia and lumbar plexus block (LPB) were still the most common regional anesthesia techniques for perioperative analgesia in children undergoing this type of surgery. recently, pediatric anesthesiologists don't consider choosing both techniques because of potential complications such as intravascular and intrathecal injection, and urine retention. novel peripheral nerve blocks have been advocated in pediatrics to avoid the aforementioned complications such as PEricapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB), and Fascia Transversalis Plane Block (FTPB) The objective of the current study is to assess the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided FTPB versus ultrasound-guided PENG block in pediatric patients undergoing open hip surgery for DDH

NCT ID: NCT05308797 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Combine Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Start date: May 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Even though Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block is shown to be efficient in cardiac surgery, the Combine Serratus Anterior Plane (CSAP) Block is still controversial if it has an efficient analgesic effect for sternotomy and drain tube pain relief. This study aims to compare ESP block and CSAP block for postoperative analgesia in coronary bypass surgery patients.

NCT ID: NCT05284695 Completed - Clinical trials for Bariatric Surgery Candidate

THE EFFICIENCY OF FASCIAL PLANE BLOCKS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY

Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Bariatric surgery effectively produces weight loss and reduces obesity-related comorbidities. Although it is mostly performed with minimally invasive techniques, the patients may still suffer from moderate-to-severe pain immediately after surgery [1]. Opioids remain the first choice for multimodal analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Providing analgesia after bariatric surgery might be challenging due to a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and the increased sensitivity to respiratory depression triggered by opioid overuse after surgeryThe most common plane block techniques utilized during laparoscopic bariatric surgery are transversus abdominis plane block (TAP), rectus sheath block (RB), the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the external oblique intercostal block (EOI). In this study, we have evaluated the auxiliary benefit of these various techniques in reduction of the postoperative in bariatric surgery. patients who had laparoscopic bariatric surgery at VKV American Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively.

NCT ID: NCT05123170 Completed - Clinical trials for Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Dexmedetomidine in IVRA

Start date: February 28, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

A prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study will be conducted on 90 patients assigned randomly into three equal groups,

NCT ID: NCT05085652 Completed - Hypotension Clinical Trials

Spinal Anesthesia Related Hypotension in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pregnant Patients

Start date: January 24, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Since the onset of COVID-19, recommendations suggest the use of neuraxial anesthesia, if possible, over general anesthesia for cesarian section to avoid the risks of aerosolization associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. But the safety of performing spinal anesthesia is unclear especially for post spinal hypotension, during the presence of active infection with COVID-19. Since at the beginning of the pandemic a few studies reported significant hypotension during epidural anesthesia in COVID-19 pregnant women, there was a controversial discussion about the safety of regional anesthesia was started. In this study we aimed to find if spinal anesthesia is safely recommended anesthesia type for COVID-19 obstetric patients. 249 patients with PCR confirmed COVID-19 for cesarean section undergoing spinal anesthesia in Ankara City Hospital, Ankara assessed in this retrospective study to find if the hypotension is the risk factor for the COVID-19 patients.

NCT ID: NCT05012332 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

Local Anesthesia Spread After an Erector Spinae Plane Block.

Start date: September 17, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This a single-center prospective spread-evaluation study where the primary objective is to assess the spread of local anesthesia in an ESPB using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The investigators will include 10 healthy volunteers from the hospitals internal website. All volunteers will receive a one-sided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block. 30 min after the block sensitivity to cold and pinprick will be assessed before an MRI is performed after 60 min postblock. An radiology specialist will evaluate the MR images pertaining to the spread of the local anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT04729712 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided ESP Vs Video-assisted PVB Catheter Placement in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

Start date: May 12, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery (MITS) is a surgical method used to perform lung surgery through small incisions between the ribs and includes both Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) and Robotic assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). MITS can cause a significant amount of postoperative pain and if this is not adequately controlled, it can delay the patient's recovery and it may be a precipitating factor for the development of Chronic Persistent Surgical Pain (CPSP). Regional anaesthesia is the use of nerve numbing medications known as local anaesthetics to block sensations of pain from a specific area of the body. For MITS, blocking pain arising from the chest wall/rib cage would improve the patient's recovery after the operation and overall patient satisfaction. There have been significant advancements made in thoracic (chest wall) regional anaesthesia techniques. Ultimately, this involves injecting local anaesthetics around the nerves that supply the chest wall. A single injection of these medications will only have a maximum effect for up to 12 hours and often this is considerably less. To prolong the pain free benefit, a thin tube known as a catheter will be placed so that the local anaesthesia medication can be continuously given by a specific mechanical pump designed for this purpose. This mechanical pump will be located at the patient's bedside and can precisely deliver the medication in question at a rate between 10-15 ml/hr. This infusion of local anaesthesia medication will continue for 48 hours after the operation and will be monitored by the hospital's pain team. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for thoracic regional anaesthesia after this type of surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to receive either an Anaesthesiologist ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with catheter insertion or surgeon video-assisted Paravertebral block (PVB) with catheter insertion. Both these regional anaesthesia techniques are well established in clinical practice, but there is little evidence published comparing them for this type of surgery, in terms of quality of patient's short term (1-2 days) and longer-term (3 months) recovery.

NCT ID: NCT04697836 Completed - Clinical trials for Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Cervical Plexus Block Combined With Translaryngeal Block for Tracheostomy

Start date: March 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Current healthcare delivery models emphasize enhanced postoperative recovery (ERAS) with minimal morbidity and shorter hospital stays. Most tracheostomy cases are tumour patients. The more the patients have difficulty in breathing, the more difficult it is to anaesthetize them. Adequate intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia with minimal sedation play an essential role in this patient model. In tracheostomy patients, moving away from the general anaesthesia option increases airway safety, and avoiding the local anaesthesia option in the incision area increases patient comfort. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of regional anaesthesia in tracheostomy patients.

NCT ID: NCT04686890 Completed - Clinical trials for Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Analgesic in Nefrectomy

Start date: December 30, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus intravenous analgesics compared relate to the morphine consumptions