View clinical trials related to Recurrence.
Filter by:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) affects about 1,200,000 individuals each year in Europe. About 50% of VTE are unprovoked and 20% of these patients will face a recurrent event after the usual three to six‐month course of anticoagulant treatment. To date, most patients are given prolonged anticoagulant treatment. However, anticoagulant treatment are associated with a major risk of bleeding (3%/year). Thus an accurate identification of patients with unprovoked VTE with a low risk of recurrence is needed to avoid unnecessary anticoagulant treatment with a risk of bleeding. Over the past few years, microparticles (MPs) which are small vesicles originating from the budding of cellular membranes have emerged as important biological entities regulating hemostasis. MPs expose at their surface procoagulant molecules such as phosphatidylserin and tissue factor (TF). All data obtained in mouse models support a role of MPs in venous thrombosis mediated by the TF activation. Moreover, results from clinical studies showed that TF-MPs was associated with the risk of venous thrombosis. However, the predictive value of TF-MPs in the recurrence of VTE is unknown. Besides, no study has taken into account the recent progresses in the understanding of the role of MPs in haemostasis. Indeed, MPs vectorize molecules which are not only procoagulant but also profibrinolytic. The net result depends on a balance between both activities (the coagulo-lytic balance). This balance is can be measured by two complimentary assays on MPs. We hypothesized that the coagu-lytic balance of MPs is associated with an increased risk of VTE recurrence after stopping the anticoagulant treatment.
This is a pilot study using decitabine and vorinostat before and during chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF (FLAG).
Cancer survivorship has become an important aspect of oncology research due to the risk of physical and psychosocial complications. These latter concerns 50 % of patients. So, the aim of this research is to measure frequency and intensity of one of these issues: the fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in the lymphoma survivorship beginning, at M0.
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of olaparib when given together with high-dose chemotherapy in treating patients with lymphomas that have come back or does not treatment and are undergoing stem cell transplant. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as olaparib, vorinostat, gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving olaparib and high-dose chemotherapy together may work better in treating patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas undergoing stem cell transplant than with chemotherapy alone.
Lime powder regimen (LPR) is a lime-derived composition enriches with citrate/citric acid and potassium. LPR was invented to treat the renal stone patients with high risk of stone recurrence after stone removal. LPR should have equal or higher efficacy and lower adverse effect than current standard medicine.
This phase Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of guadecitabine and how well it works when given together with durvalumab in treating patients with liver, pancreatic, bile duct, or gallbladder cancer that has spread to other places in the body. Guadecitabine may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, may block tumor growth in different ways by targeting certain cells. Giving guadecitabine and durvalumab may work better in treating patients with liver, pancreatic, bile duct, or gallbladder cancer.
This is a phase 1b/2 study to determine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of pembrolizumab and idelalisib in NSCLC patients whose disease has stopped responding to immune therapy. This study is being done to see if adding another immune modulator (idelalisib) to standard pembrolizumab will increase response rates, compared to the response seen with pembrolizumab alone.
This Protocol is a pilot, clinical interventional study to selected patients between five and fourteen years of both sexes, carriers of the diagnosis of glioma brain stem and high grade recurrent in the central nervous system tumors, in whom there has been no response to conventional-based surgery/radiation/chemotherapy treatment or whose location does not allow treatment with conventional measures, and that already have an indication for a neurosurgical palliative procedure. It will be a close pharmacovigilance on possible adverse effects related to the nanomaterial based on the profile of cisplatin (chemotherapeutic platinum derivative), since documented toxicity data are not counted for NPt-Ca. Quality of life will be documented with PedsQL Cancer Module© and tumor size by magnetic resonance brain images.
This randomized phase II trial includes a blood stem cell transplant from an unrelated donor to treat blood cancer. The treatment also includes chemotherapy drugs, but in lower doses than conventional (standard) stem cell transplants. The researchers will compare two different drug combinations used to reduce the risk of a common but serious complication called "graft versus host disease" (GVHD) following the transplant. Two drugs, cyclosporine (CSP) and sirolimus (SIR), will be combined with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). This part of the transplant procedure is the main research focus of the study.
The Phase 1 part of the study is conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of eribulin mesilate in combination with irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric participants with relapsed/refractory solid tumors (excluding central nervous system [CNS] tumors). The Phase 2 part of the study is conducted to assess the objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) of eribulin mesilate in combination with irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric participants with relapsed/refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) and ewing sarcoma (EWS).