View clinical trials related to Recurrence.
Filter by:This study is being done to investigate clonal hematopoiesis and therapy-emergent myeloid neoplasms in patients with ovarian cancers. Researchers want to identify risk factors for developing these blood cancers as well as if there is/are a genetic/environmental component(s) to developing blood cancer.
A Phase Ia Study to Evaluate the Safety/Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of IMB071703 Injection in Subjects with Recurrent or Metastatic，Advanced Solid Tumors
Retention has been defined as "the holding of teeth following orthodontic treatment in the treated position for the period of time necessary for the maintenance of the result". Controversies regarding retention regime exist due to lack of high quality evidence regarding duration, type and timing of different type retainer.The present randomised controlled trial will be undertaken to assess the changes and compare if there is any difference in movement of teeth in post orthodontic treatment cases with immediate and delayed (post 7 days) delivery using beggs retainer and change in level of bone biomarker over 6 months period of retention .
About 80% of advanced ovarian cancer patients recurred in 2-3 years. Secondary cytoreduction benefits selected patients who have high chance of complete resection. Whether secondary interval surgery can be used at recurrence is not known.
Antecedents: electrical isolation of pulmonary veins is the standard treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. However, its efficacy is lower in persistent and chronic forms of this arrhythmia compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Many complementary techniques have been proposed, that added to pulmonary veins isolation, may reduce the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation. However, none of them has obtained consistent results. Linear ablation aims to parcellate and modify the left atrial substrate responsible for atrial fibrillation maintenance. Previous studies have offered contradictory results using linear ablation. Methods: SUPAFER is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized clinical trial that compares the efficacy of pulmonary veins isolation alone vs pulmonary vein isolation plus an specific protocol of left atrial linear ablation. Contrary to previous studies, the specific SUPAFER linear ablation is systematic, homogeneous and target atrial areas that have not been systematically ablated in previous trials. The trial aims at demonstrating the superiority of the combined ablative approach during 1-year follow-up. Daily transtelephonic ECG samples a 30 days continuous ECG monitoring are used to maximize de detection of recurrences, even asymptomatic.
The aim of this study is to compare two distinct modes of NIM Vital application in thyroid surgery: NerveTrend vs. NerveAssure mode with respect to prevalence of early postoperative RLN injury. The hypothesis explored in this study is that NerveTrend mode may be not inferior than NerveAssure mode in intraoperative identification of impending neural injury and in prognostication of postoperative glottis function in monitored bilateral thyroid surgery. Hence, NerveTrend mode may be considered a bridge between i-IONM and NerveAssure modes, and particularly in health care environments with limited financial resources it can be considered a substantial step forward representing a modern alternative to the NerveAssure technique. A prospective, randomized study with 2 arms: NeveTrend vs. NerveAssure mode (n=132 patients and 264 nerves at risk, each). The primary outcome measure is prevalence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury (%) on postoperative day 1 assessed by direct laryngoscopy.
Participants will have a sample of their white blood cells, called T cells, collected using a procedure called leukapheresis. The collected T cells will be sent to a laboratory to be changed (modified) to become 19-28z/IL-18, the CAR T-cell therapy that participants will receive during the study. Making the participants' study therapy will take about 2-4 weeks.
Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Raphamin in Prevention of Recurrences of Chronic Bacterial Cystitis
Previous evidence has indicated that resection for recurrent glioblastoma might benefit the prognosis of these patients in terms of overall survival. However, the demonstrated safety profile of this approach is contradictory in the literature and the specific benefits in distinct clinical and molecular patient subgroups remains ill-defined. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of resection and best oncological treatment for recurrent glioblastoma as a whole and in clinically important subgroups. This study is an international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will undergo tumor resection or best oncological treatment at a 1:1 ratio as decided by the tumor board. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery and 2) overall survival. Secondary endpoints are: 1) progression-free survival (PFS), 2) NIHSS deterioration at 3 months and 6 months after surgery, 3) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year. The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC Zuid-West Holland/Erasmus Medical Center; MEC-2020-0812). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.
This is a prospective, single-arm exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with Adebrelimab and Apatinib as the perioperative treatment in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer.