View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The laparoscopic approach for total mesorectal excision (L-TME) results improved short-term outcomes. However this approach has technical limitations when the pelvis is narrow and deep. Indeed there is a limited mobility of straight laparoscopic instruments and associated loss of dexterity, unstable camera view and compromised ergonomics for the surgeon. Robotic technology was developed to reduce these limitations and offers the advantages of intuitive manipulation of laparoscopic instruments with wrist articulation, a 3-dimensional field of view, a stable camera platform with zoom magnification, dexterity enhancement and an ergonomic operating environment. A major advantage of the robotic approach is the surgeon's simultaneous control of the camera and of the two or three additional instruments. This advantage facilitates traction and counter-traction. The technological advantages of robotic surgery should also allow a finer dissection in a narrow pelvic cavity.
Neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (NRCT) represents a milestone in the treatment of selected rectal tumours. Ideal time interval between the end of NRCT and surgery is still debated; a 6-8 weeks time interval is considered optimal, but shorter or longer intervals have been associated with better oncological outcomes. Moreover, there is a lack of data about clinical postoperative outcomes and different time intervals after the end of NRCT. Here, effect that different time intervals have on postoperative complications with particular regard to the anastomotic dehiscence have been evaluated. Methods One hundred-sixty-seven patients underwent surgery after long-course NRCT. Three different time intervals were considered: (0-42; 43-56; >57 days).
It is a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled clinical study of patients with mid- or low- rectal cancer who received laparoscopic TME surgery aims to explore whether the application of near infrared-indocyanine green imaging system can evaluate the anastomotic blood perfusion accurately, and optimize the surgical procedures, or even reduce the incidence rates of postoperative anastomotic leakage in mid- or low- rectal cancer patients.
This is an exploratory, open-label, single arm, non-randomized, multicenter, phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and clinical complete response rate in patients with rectal cancer and tumor preoperative evaluation after NAC (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy) with NALIRINOX (5-FU [fluorouracil)/LV [Leucovorin calcium] + oxaliplatin + nal-IRI [Liposomal Irinotecan]) and chemoradiotherapy.
A Clinical and Biological Database will provide to the scientific community a collection of blood and tissues with clinical data to improve knowledge about cancer and help to develope new cancer treatments. This database is specific to Rectum Cancer.
Anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard procedure for mid and low rectal cancers . A colo-rectal anastomosis under peritoneal reflection is, most of the time, protected by a temporary loop stoma to decrease the risk and severity of anastomotic morbidity. This stoma, which is intended to be temporary, appears to be permanent in 6 to 32% of cases in the literature. The main risk factor being anastomotic leakage. Two major risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery are " male sex " and " Body mass index ", which are responsible of a higher anatomical difficulty (Narrow pelvis and bulky mesorectal fat) Therefore, the objective of this study is to look for a statistical link between permanent stoma and intraoperative difficulty represented by pelvic anatomical constraints.
Intro: Recent studies on colorectal cancer surgery have been focusing on the role of intestinal microbiome on surgical outcomes. Standard perioperative cares, like mechanic bowel preparation (MBP), administration of antibiotics (ABT) and surgery-related stress and injury influence the microbiome composition and possibly induce a shift toward a microbiome dysbiotic state, which predisposes to complicated postoperative course. Microbiome composition changes and enhanced virulence factors may increase the risk of postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage (AL), surgical site infection (SSI), and postoperative ileus (PI), which are known to impact on patient's overall survival and cancer recurrence. Objective: The primary objective is to investigate if a significant association might exist between the microbiome composition and the occurrence of postoperative complications at 90 days. Methods: 3 different microbiome samples will be taken from all patients. Two fresh fecal samples for detection of LM and fecal water preparation: a) a day before the surgery before MBP and/or ABT (LM1), b) postoperatively after first bowel movement (LM2). One sample will be taken intra-operatively from the stapled resection lines of circular stapler used for forming a colorectal anastomosis, to detect the MAM and to perform immunohistochemistry staining for detection of HACE1 expression. DNA analysis will be performed for all samples. IHC will be performed for detecting HACE1 expression in the tumor and colorectal anastomosis tissues using anti-HACE1 antibodies. . For proliferation assessment, human colon carcinoma cell lines HT29 will be plated in monolayers and scratched with a single scratch. Monolayers will be incubated for 24 hours with fecal water from patients with surgical complications and matched control patients without complications. Descriptive statistics will be performed to describe the study population. This project aim to describe microbiome composition and its impact on postoperative complications.
Background: About 700 patients per year undergo an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for distal rectal cancer (Dutch Colorectal Audit 2016).Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy is often used to further improve locoregional control. Morbidity after APR is substantial and mainly consisting of perineal wound problems in about 35% of the patients. lf primary healing of the perineal wound after APR doesn't occur, secondary healing can take up to one year, and there is even a small proportion of patients in whom a chronic perineal wound or fistula persists after one year. During this long period, intensive wound care is necessary. This results in a heavy burden on both patient and health care resources. Objective: The high morbidity rate of the perineal wound has resulted in a continuing discussion on how to close the perineal defect after APR. Our research group recently published the BIOPEX-study (NL42094.018.12), in which 104 patients were randomized between primary perinea! wound closure and biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after APR with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Similar uncomplicated perineal wound healing rate at 30 days (Southampton wound score < 2) was found: 63% versus 66%, respectively. The hypothesis behind this negative trial result is related to the perineal dead space between the skin and the biological mesh. Fluid will accumulate in this dead space with the risk of secondary contamination and abscess formation, leading to wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. Autologous tissue flaps have been suggested to improve perineal wound healing based on several cohort studies. At least in the Netherlands, these flaps are used only for selected patients with the large defects and highest risk of wound problems, because of the more extensive surgery with added surgical trauma and operative time, and associated donor site morbidity. For these reasons, primary perineal closure (control arm of BIOPEX) is still the standard of care in the Netherlands. A gluteal turnover flap (GT flap) is a small transposition flap trom the unilateral adjacent perineal skin and subcutaneous fat, which is flipped into the perineal dead space, and stitched with the de-epithelialised dermis to the contralateral pelvic floor remnant. Subsequently, the perineal subcutaneous fat and skin are closed over the flap in the midline, thereby not adding a donor site scar. A small pilot study trom our group showed that this is a promising solution for routine perineal closure after APR. Study design: In this multicenter single blinded study, eligible patients will be randomized between pelvic floor reconstruction using a GT flap (intervention arm) and primary closure of the perineal defect (standard arm). The perineal wound healing will be evaluated at 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively using the Southampton wound scoring system by an independent observer.
Pathologic complete response rate
The purpose of this study is to test the usability of the Plan To Thrive smartphone application with cancer survivors. This study will involve three visits (baseline, follow-up, and feedback assessments). Between the baseline and follow-up time points, patients will undergo a 90-day period in which they will engage with app content. It is hypothesized that cancer survivors in this study will find the smartphone application, Plan to Thrive, an acceptable and feasible way to access post-treatment information. In addition, the investigators will explore preliminary efficacy by examining changes over time in primary (patient activation, patient knowledge and adherence to follow-up care recommendations and health behaviors) and secondary outcomes [symptom burden, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction].