View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:This study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for the resection of mid and low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision（LaTME）.
This study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TaTME technique compared with conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery, focusing on, anastomotic dehiscence, conversion rate to open surgery, hospital stay and long-term functional outcomes.
Among patients treated for locally advanced rectal cancer with neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, about 15% will have complete clinical response in terms of no visible tumor or ulcerations on the site of the primary tumor, or whitening of the rectal wall or telangiectasia. In this Norwegian national multicenter observational study, patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neo-adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer as defined by national guidelines, will be invited to a Watch&Wait program with a specially designed follow-up in order to see if the tumor has disappeared permanently, or if there is regrowth of the tumor. Primary endpoint is the true regrowth rate in an unselected national cohort of patients.
The purpose of this study was to research on the safety and feasibility of ISR combined with low energy X ray intra-operative radiotherapy for the patients with local advanced rectal cancer.
This is a randomized, controlled, parallel study to determine the difference in post-operative anastomotic leak rate of colorectal anastomosis where colon and rectal tissue perfusion is evaluated using fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green and without this method.
Total mesorectal excision (TME) has been prevailingly accepted as a crucial surgical intervention within the latest oncological therapeutic regime for mid-low rectal cancer. However, surgical dissection under the restricted pelvic anatomical structure, added by obesity and many other general factors, remains challenging for classical open and laparoscopic patterns, particularly in male cases. The introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) offers an optimal pattern for the surgical resection of mid-low rectal cancer, circumventing the conventional anatomical limits while bringing forward considerable advantages by direct dissection. Noteworthy, the surgical techniques of TaTME is initially established, with the mortality/morbidity and the oncological safety unverified. The studies that focus on the comparison between TaTME and laparoscopic TME (LaTME) remain sparse. Therefore, the features of TaTME, both in short and long terms, await further consolidation by clinical trials. Herein, this single centered, interventional study protocol is established to collect initial clinical data on both the safety and efficacy of the TaTME in comparison with LaTME in East Chinese patients with mid-low rectal cancer.
Background. About 20% of rectal cancers who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (neoCHT-RT) achieve a pathological complete response in the surgical specimen(ypT0); however, about 10% of ypT0 present metastatic nodes (N+). Although seldom analyzed, ypT0N+ identification could be crucial in order to tailor treatments. Hypotheses. The two hypotheses to test are if we can identify ypT0N+ and if N+ is an independent prognostic factor. Aim 1. To create a large Database (DB) of ypT0. Aim 2. To compare ypT0N0 vs ypT0N+ with respect of their clinical/radiological/molecular features. Aim 3. To investigate long term results. Preliminary Study. Dr Lorenzon is the PI of an Italian retrospective multicentric study conducted on 260 ypT0 focused on treatment and outcomes. Design. The PI will operate in partnership with the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO). A DB will be used by ESSO-affiliated centres for collecting the clinical, pathological and radiological data of ypT0N0/N+, previously treated (last 5 years) and prospectively enrolled (6 months + 2 years of follow-up); each centre will provide a junior (<40 yrs) member for data collection and a senior investigator .for data validation; all the analyses will be centralized by the PI. ypT0N0 and ypT0N+ will be compared for the clinical/pathological variables, for the gene expression profiles of pre-neoCHT-RT biopsies (grant requested). Uni-multivariate survival analyses (end-points: OS, DFS, DSS) will be conducted at 2 years of follow-up. Impact. This is the first study aimed to investigate ypT0N+ features; their accurate identification could lead to treat safely thousands of ypT0N0/year with local excisions leaving major surgery for N+ patients. Results will change practice and reduce considerably health-related costs; moreover, the molecular profiles will open new frontiers of research.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is considered the commonest major complication after surgery for rectal cancer. Transanal tube drainage role in the prevention of AL is still debatable.
This trial is investigating the inclusion of avelumab post long-course chemo-radiotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. It is hypothesised that this may enhance the pathological and imaging response rates whilst potentially reducing the relapse rates. Participants will receive standard long course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) treatment with radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil (5 FU)/Capecitabine for 6 weeks, this then followed by 4 cycles of Avelumab and then surgical resection. The trial will measure disease response just prior to surgery and participants will be followed up for a minimum of 18 months (from study entry) and up to 42 months.
This study is a prospective, monocentric study whose aim is to assess the quality of life for patients who underwent a coloanal continuity reconstruction and to understand the functional issues they encounter. This will potentially provide predictive factors identification of bad functional outcomes allowing to guide future decisions. Also, it will allow patients to have a reinforced follow-up during the year after the reconstruction.