Single vs. Multiple Fraction Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastases/Progression

Quality of Life Clinical Trial

Official title: Single vs. Multiple Fraction Non-Inferiority Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligo-metastases/Progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is a modern RT technique that delivers high doses of radiation to small tumor targets using highly conformal techniques, while trying to avoid healthy tissues and organs. However, SABR treatment requires increased planning, treatment time, cost and potential for higher toxicity due to the higher dose. The purpose of this study is to compare single fraction (SF) SABR vs. multiple fraction (MF) SABR in regards to toxicities, progression-free survival, quality of life (QoL), and cost-effectiveness. In a subset of patients, we will also compare patient QoL, hospitalization rates, and cost-effectiveness between patients who complete QoL questionnaires, record symptoms and receive healthcare provider-guided intervention vs. patients who complete QoL questionnaires only.

Clinical Trial Description

Radiation can be delivered in multiple fractions, or doses, and can take up to several weeks or months of treatment depending on the type of cancer. Radiation can also be offered in a single fraction. Both techniques have evidence for use in clinical care. Multiple fraction is offered to reduce the amount of radiation given at a single time that could reduce late toxicities. However, single fraction radiotherapy is more cost-effective and saves patient time. With this trial, we will compare single fraction vs. multiple fraction in regards to their impact on toxicity, progression-free survival: time from randomization to disease progression at any site or death, lesional control rate: lesion size post-SABR, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. In a subset of sites, we will also investigate the impact of healthcare-provider guided intervention on quality of life. Questionnaires capture various symptoms such as pain, fatigue and information relating to physical, social, and mental wellbeing. This information can help shed light on patient experience and provide a better understanding of the effects of radiation therapy. In this trial, we will compare quality of life questionnaire completion, symptom reporting and healthcare-provider guided intervention vs. quality of life questionnaire completion alone, in regards to patient quality of life. Hospitalization rates and frequency of emergency department visits will also be investigated. Sample size: The total sample size of 598 for this trial was calculated based on the primary endpoint of toxicity for the single vs. multiple fraction SABR randomization. Calculations were performed based on the results of the SABR-5 trial and our clinical judgement. Quality Assurance: Radiation treatments are based on the current phase III SABR-COMET-3 trial and as per recent clinical evidence. All treatments will be planned as per protocol including computed tomography (CT) simulation, organs at risk contouring and undergo a quality assurance process. For the subset of sites involved in the second randomization, training will be provided to patients on the use of Noona, a patient-reported outcome platform. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Oligometastatic Disease
• Quality of Life
• Toxicity Due to Radiotherapy

• NCT number: NCT05784428
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: British Columbia Cancer Agency
• Contact: Robert Olson, MD, MSC, FRCPC
• Phone: 250-645-7300
• Email: rolson2@bccancer.bc.ca
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 1, 2024
• Completion date: March 30, 2034