The Helping Older People Engage Project: Improving Social Well-Being in Later Life

Quality of Life Clinical Trial

— HOPE  

Official title:

The Getting Active Project (GAP): A Randomized Trial of Volunteering to Reduce Loneliness in Later Life

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03343483
• Other study ID #: R01AG054457
• Secondary ID: R01AG054457
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: October 2023
• Source: University of Rochester
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Older adults who feel lonely carry increased risk for reduced quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Volunteering is a promising intervention for reducing loneliness in later life. The primary objective of this proposal is to test the hypothesis that a social volunteering program for lonely older adults will lead to reduced loneliness and improved quality of life. This study compares the effect of a Senior Corps volunteering intervention versus a self-guided life review active control condition on feelings of loneliness in older adults. The study involves randomly assigning older adults (150 women, 150 men) who report loneliness to 12 months of either: 1) a structured social volunteering program, or 2) an active control intervention with self-guided life review. Specific aims are as follows: 1) To examine the effect of volunteering on loneliness and quality of life; 2) To examine social engagement, perceived usefulness, and social support as mechanisms for reducing loneliness; 3) To examine conditions under which volunteering is most effective at reducing loneliness.

Description:

The many negative outcomes associated with loneliness in older people have rendered loneliness itself a new public health target. Older adults who feel lonely carry increased risk for reduced quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. The risk of premature mortality related to loneliness is at least as large as the risks arising from such factors as obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol misuse, and smoking. Volunteering is a promising intervention for reducing loneliness in later life. The primary objective of this proposal is to test the hypothesis that a social volunteering program for lonely older adults will lead to reduced loneliness and improved quality of life. National infrastructure for volunteering (The Senior Corps) ensures that volunteering is a highly scalable intervention. The investigators propose to compare the effect of a Senior Corps volunteering intervention versus a self-guided life review active control condition on feelings of loneliness in older adults. The investigators' preliminary data, as well as published studies of volunteering in later life, strongly suggest that volunteering should reduce loneliness. Rigorous experimental study is needed, however, to examine volunteering in both men and women who are lonely, to determine conditions that maximize benefit, and to understand mechanisms. The investigators hypothesize, per tenets of Self-Determination Theory, that increased social engagement and feelings of both usefulness and social support function as psychological mechanisms whereby volunteering reduces loneliness. Understanding these mechanisms will promote effective implementation, allowing communities to adapt volunteering programs while retaining the active ingredients. The study involves randomly assigning older adults (150 women, 150 men) who report loneliness to 12 months of either: 1) a structured social volunteering program, or 2) an active control intervention with self-guided life review. Specific aims are as follows: 1) To examine the effect of volunteering on loneliness and quality of life; 2) To examine social engagement, perceived usefulness, and social support as mechanisms for reducing loneliness; 3) To examine conditions under which volunteering is most effective at reducing loneliness. The volunteering intervention is already implemented nation-wide, indicating high feasibility of going to scale (http://www.nationalservice.gov/programs/senior-corps). If effective, volunteering should be "prescribed" by physicians and promoted by policy. Dissemination and scaling up efforts will involve connecting primary care patients and aging services clients who are lonely with The Senior Corps, shown to be feasible in the investigators' companion study, The Senior Connection. Existing infrastructure will make it possible to reach a large proportion of lonely older adults. Reducing loneliness has the potential to improve well-being and save lives.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 291
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: May 15, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 60 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 60 or older
• English-speaking
• UCLA Short Form Loneliness Scale score of 6 or more
• Ability to supply own transportation to care receiver's home; active drivers license and automobile insurance (or alternate transportation such as city bus)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Current problem drinking
• Psychosis
• Significant cognitive impairment (MOCA<22)
• Hearing problems that preclude engagement with a care receiver
• Illiteracy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Loneliness
• Quality of Life

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Volunteering
Volunteers provide non-medical caregiving for frail seniors-"care receivers"-to help them maintain their independence and improve their well-being. Friendly visiting is the primary service provided. Structured, intensive training is provided prior to placement. The target expectation is of interactions in person and/or by telephone for at least 16 hours per month. On-going training ("booster sessions") as well as volunteer support groups, and educational activities are provided. Participants not interested in serving as peer companions are allowed other volunteer options as long as the activities are deemed 'social' by the volunteer coordinator and are options routinely provided as part of the AmeriCorps Senior RSVP Program. COVID update: due to physical distancing requirements, volunteer placements have transitioned to remote friendly calling/letter writing or activities that can be conducted with physical distancing, such as delivery for Meals on Wheels.
• Life Review
Subjects will complete a self-guided life review exercise over 12 months. Subjects will complete one section of the life review (with the self-help book) each month and send 'assignments' once per month to an email 'counselor' who will respond with supportive comments within three days.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Rochester	Rochester	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Rochester	National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Van Orden KA, Conwell Y, Chapman BP, Buttaccio A, VanBergen A, Beckwith E, Santee A, Rowe J, Palumbos D, Williams G, Messing S, Sorensen S, Tu X. The helping older people engage (HOPE) study: Protocol & COVID modifications for a randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Nov 30;30:101040. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101040. eCollection 2022 Dec. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Social Isolation	Social isolation (PROMIS) is a computerized adaptive test (CAT). It produces T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Greater scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., greater social isolation).	Month 12
Primary	Loneliness	UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3, which assesses self-reported loneliness. 20 items, rated as to how often the participant has felt a certain way in the prior month (e.g., "How often do you feel alone?") -- "never" (1), "rarely" (2), "sometimes" (3), or "often" (4). Higher scores indicate greater loneliness. However, some individual items must be reverse-coded so that higher total scores reflect greater loneliness (i.e., 1=4, 2=3, 3=2, 4=1). These items (e.g., "How often do you feel there are people you can turn to?") are items 1,5,6,9,10,15,16,19,20. Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores representing a worse outcome (i.e., greater loneliness). Subjects completed this scale at 1 year follow-up, reflecting on the prior month.	Month 12
Primary	Health-related Quality of Life	World Health Organization Quality of Life--Bref instrument (WHOQOL-Bref). This self-report instrument comprises 26 items. The WHOQOL-Bref produces scores for four domains (i.e., physical health, psychological functioning, social relationships, and environmental opportunities) and a total score reflecting overall health-related quality of life. Our primary outcome is the total score assessing overall quality of life. All items are rated on a 5-pt scale, with scores of 5 representing the best outcome. Some items are reversed scored (per the WHOQOL manual). Scores are transformed (per the WHOQOL manual) such that the range for the total score is 0-100, with 100 representing the highest quality of life.	Month 12
Secondary	Belonging (Mechanism)	Perceptions of belonging will be measured with the 9 items in the "belonging" subscale of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Each item is rated on a 3-pt scale: 'not at all true for me' (0), 'somewhat true for me' (1), or 'very true for me' (2). Some items are reverse scored so that higher scores represent better outcomes (i.e., greater belonging). Scores represent a sum of all items and can range from 0 - 18.	Month 12
Secondary	Meaning and Purpose (Mechanism)	The PROMIS Meaning and Purpose short form was used to assess the degree to which subjects felt increased usefulness and purpose. It has 4 items, rated from 1 ('not at all'), 2 ('a little bit'), 3 ('somewhat'), 4 ('quite a bit'), and 5 ('very much'). Total scores are transformed using a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of the reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. For the Meaning and Purpose form, the reference group was a general (not clinical) population. Greater scores indicate a better outcome (i.e., greater meaning and purpose).	Month 12
Secondary	Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities (Mechanism)	Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS) was used to assess the construct of social engagement. It is a computerized adaptive test (CAT). It produces T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Greater scores indicate better outcomes (i.e., greater satisfaction with social role and activities).	Month 12