View clinical trials related to Quality of Life.
Filter by:Latina breast cancer survivors report lower quality of life (QOL) than non-Latina survivors. Lower QOL can lead to poorer functional and cancer-related survival outcomes. The friends and family of Latina cancer patients are also impacted by a loved one's diagnosis of breast cancer. Through strong community-academic partnerships, the investigators seek to improve the QOL of Latina survivors and their caregivers with a culturally-relevant intervention. In this project, the investigators plan to further develop and refine the intervention and then test it through a randomized controlled trial. First, the investigators will conduct in-depth qualitative interviews with 10 survivor-caregiver dyads (pairs) to see if the intervention fits for survivors and caregivers in different parts of the country. Then, the investigators will revise the intervention. Finally, the investigators will test the intervention in a randomized controlled trial. The investigators will invite 125 survivor-caregiver dyads to be a part of our study. Half will be asked to complete the intervention and half will be offered the usual services, such as support groups. The information learned from this study could help improve the quality of life in Latina breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. Physicians, survivors, and community groups can also benefit from this study because they will have more information about the needs of Latina breast cancer survivors. The investigators hope to use the information to help other types of survivors and caregivers in the future.
A 16 week pilot study for Allina call center employees to look at the psychological outcomes and biological markers after an intervention of using a standing work station. There were two groups: group 1 received, and was instructed to use, the standing work station for all 16 weeks, group 2 was a wait-list control group and received, and was instructed to use, the standing work station for the second 8 weeks. Psychological outcomes were measured at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16. Biological markers were measured at weeks 0, 8, and 16.
Background: High prevalence of fecal incontinence after rectal resection in patients with rectal carcinoma. Hypothesis: Anorectal manometry done before ileostomy or sigmoidostomy closure can predict fecal incontinence. Methods: Anorectal manometry before, 1 month and 6 month after closure. Anorectal endosonography before and 1 month after closure. Prediction of postoperative incontinence by the surgeon (digital sphincter examination). Visual analog scales for continence, subjective success of operation, and global well being; Wexner and Vaizey incontinence score; Parks incontinence classification; Rockwood fecal incontinence quality of life score; each before, 1 and 6 month after closure.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of Mesalamine and Amitriptyline drugs on the Quality of Life and Symptom Severity Scale in patients with Diarrhea- Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D). All patients will fill three validated questionnaires (IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) , Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS ) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) ) at the beginning of trial and at weeks 2,4,6 and 8 of treatment. Serum Immune Bio markers will be measured at 0,4, and 8 weeks of treatment. This study is a clinical trial upon 90 patients with Diarrhea- Predominant IBS (IBS-D) who are referred for the first time to our private gastrointestinal clinic from 2014 until 2016. All patients who meet the inclusion criteria enrolled for a 2-week period screening phase. In order to exclude patients with Lactose intolerance, all patients take a lactose-free diet for 14 days before inclusion and patients whose symptoms improve by this regimen will be excluded. This trial is a double-blind study and all patients will be assigned randomly to three groups: 1. Mesalazine group: Patients receive Asacol (800 mg/TDS) and a placebo agent similar to Amitriptyline (10 mg/HS) for 8 weeks 2. Amitriptyline group: Patients receive Amitriptyline (10 mg/HS) and a placebo like Asacol (800 mg/ TDS) for 8 weeks 3. Control group (placebo group): Patients receive placebo like Asacol (800 mg/TDS) and placebo similar to Amitriptyline (10 mg/HS) for 8 weeks Ethical considerations: 1. All patients will fulfill an informed consent 2. Drugs are available without any charge 3. Observation of Helsinki ethical statement
The purpose of this study is to comparison the effect of acupuncture and Fluoxetine on improvement quality of life among menopausal women.
Primary Objective To determine if post-operative static pain scores differ between women undergoing bilateral mastectomy followed by bilateral immediate tissue expander reconstruction randomized either to ropivacaine- (treatment) or saline- (placebo) pre-operatively placed paravertebral blocks. Post-operative pain scores will be measured by a 0-10 Likert scale 6 hours after the end of surgery while the patient is still hospitalized (post-operative day 0). This will be patient-provided data. Unblinded data analysis will compare scores between treatment and control groups. Secondary Objectives To determine if post-operative moving pain scores, opioids use, nausea, and sleep interference differ between women undergoing bilateral mastectomy followed by bilateral immediate tissue expander reconstruction randomized either to ropivacaine- (treatment) or saline- (placebo) pre-operatively placed paravertebral blocks. Pain score, opioids use, nausea, and sleep interference data will be collected via patient self-report. When possible (i.e., while hospitalized) objective data on opioids and other pain medication administered to the patient will be used. Tertiary Objectives To determine if long-term changes in Quality of Life scores [the RAND-36 Health Survey, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire, and Breast-Q scores] differ between women undergoing bilateral mastectomy followed by bilateral immediate tissue expander reconstruction randomized either to ropivacaine- (treatment) or saline- (placebo) pre-operatively placed paravertebral blocks. This data will be collected via validated questionnaires through patient interviews at 3-months, 2-years, and 4-years (±14 days) after surgery. Once enrolled in the study, participants will be encouraged to remain in the study for the 4 years following surgery in order to get final pain scores and quality-of-life/health outcome survey information. Participants who cannot be contacted after several phone attempts and the sending of 2 certified letters via US Postal Service for 3-month, 2-year, and/or 4-year outcome assessments will be considered lost to follow-up.
Between 2007-2010 the Child Protection Team (CPT) at University Children's Hospital Zurich was the first in Europe to follow up the development of maltreated children in a hospital sample . The follow-up took place 2-3 years after the child had been reported to the CPT. As a major result, children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) had been impaired in maltreated children compared to controls (Jud, Landolt, Tatalias, Lach, & Lips, 2012). However, this difference only emerged for the self-assessment of HRQoL by children aged 6 years or older .To address limitations, the CPT at University Children's Hospital Zurich and Children's Hospital Baden AG propose a prospective study with a baseline at the time of report to the CPT and a two year follow-up. This study aims at analyzing HRQoL, behavior and mental health of maltreated children prospectively and will be the first to provide data on changes in HRQoL in the aftermath of maltreatment. We assume the following hypotheses: - The HRQoL and mental health of children will be impaired following maltreatment even while controlling for others possible predictors of impaired HRQoL and mental health. - We assume a dose-response relationship between severity of maltreatment and impaired HRQoL. Multiple maltreatment is hypothesized to have a larger impact then a single type of maltreatment. - At baseline, HRQoL scores are hypothesized to be at a markedly low level. We assume a slight increase in HRQoL from baseline to first follow-up, but not a continuing increase to second follow-up.
As a function of the growing population of older adults, an estimated 3.48 million total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures will be performed annually in the U.S. by 2030. Despite the near-universal success of this surgery in mitigating chronic knee pain, TKA is not successful in restoring long-term physical function in older adults, primarily because of quadriceps muscle atrophy, which explains 77% of the strength deficits. Overall, strength and functional mobility in TKA patients is 30-50% below age-matched healthy controls. Functional tasks such as stair-climbing remain a clinical problem for 75% of patients following TKA. Muscle atrophy occurs in both operative and non-operative legs, and is essentially permanent for older patients because of their impaired ability to increase muscle mass. The purpose of this clinical research is to determine the effects of essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and functional mobility following TKA in older adults. Based on strong preliminary data, the investigators hypothesize that twice-daily ingestion of 23 g of EAA for 1 wk before through 6 wk after TKA will increase basal rates of muscle protein synthesis via inactivation of catabolic signaling, and up-regulation of anabolic and cyto-protective proteins. The investigators further hypothesize that short-term atrophy prevention and accelerated return of functional mobility will lead to longer-term structural and functional adaptations, and improved quality of life in older TKA patients vs. Placebo. Identifying the mechanisms up-regulated by EAA treatment that preserve muscle volume and mobility will have a major impact on rehabilitation science. This study will accomplish two specific aims: (1) determine if EAA elevates basal rates of muscle protein synthesis by up-regulating anabolic pathways and cyto-protective proteins, and inactivating catabolic pathways in the short term vs. Placebo and (2) determine if short-term prevention of atrophy, weakness, and functional mobility leads to positive changes in muscle cell structure and function, and improved quality of life in the longer term vs. Placebo. This work is significant because it advances knowledge of the molecular and cellular changes occurring during muscle atrophy (Placebo) and atrophy prevention (EAA) in a clinical setting using a treatment that is broadly applicable, is well tolerated, and can be implemented immediately.
The purpose of the study is to investigate health-promoting and stress-reducing psychological, physiological and hormonal effects of a 9-week meditation-based course in personal health and to examine potential baseline factors for any such effects. Thus, the investigators will investigate the course format (individual course or group-based course) as a potential factor the course outcome, and also individual background factors such as demographics and genetic variations.
Hypothesis 1: The proportion of pre-ART patients whose CD4 cell counts decline to ART-eligibility within 48 weeks will be lower in intervention compared to the non-intervention arm. Hypothesis 2: PLHIV who receive the PSCB intervention will experience lower rates of morbidity or death over the follow-up period compared to patients not receiving the intervention Hypothesis 3: PLHIV who receive the PCSB intervention will have better adherence to scheduled clinic appointments compared to those not receiving the intervention