View clinical trials related to Pulmonary Embolism.
Filter by:In this study, we will assess the efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of thrombolytic therapy given in addition to low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism. Half of participants will receive thrombolytic treatment, while the other half will receive a placebo.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical manifestations, imaging features, and prognosis-related factors of pulmonary embolism, and to explore the prognosis risk assessment model for Chinese patients
The main objective of this study is to describe the incidence of thromboembolic events in a population of patients hospitalized in intensive care units in France for severe COVID-19. The secondary objective of this study is to describe the evolution of hemostasis parameters during the first two weeks of intensive care hospitalization and to evaluate the influence of different anticoagulation regimens on these parameters and on the incidence of thromboembolic events
To investigate safety and effectiveness of PE treatment according to the decision of the multi-disciplinary pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) and to define and optimize treatment indications, institutional algorithms and interventional techniques for PE.
Patients with COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe form have a poor prognosis (almost 30% rate of death). They present often a high cardiovascular risk profile (almost 30% of hypertension and 19% of diabetes). Troponin has been described to be elevated in a high proportion of patients (one fifth of all patients and 50% of non-survivors) suggesting the possibility of cardiomyopathies. High levels of DDimers (81% of non survivors) and fibrin degradation products are also associated with increased risk of mortality suggesting also the possibility of venous thromboembolism. Therefore, screening for cardiomyopathies and venous thromboembolism could represent an important challenge for patients with COVID-19 management.
The mortality of severe pulmonary embolisms admitted to the resuscitation department for circulatory failure remains in the range of 30-40% at the acute phase. Hemodynamic failure is the leading cause of death. These patients frequently have a contraindication to thrombolysis. Surgical pulmonary arterial desobstruction still leads to significant hospital mortality and can't be implemented in all hospitals. Concerning advanced hemodynamic support techniques, they can't always reduce mortality on themselves. There is therefore a need for developing alternative approaches for less invasive pulmonary arterial desobstruction. Data on the efficacy and safety of percutaneous methods of desobstruction are still too limited to implement them in current practice. AngioJet ™ PE is a device CE marked for intra-arterial desobstruction of pulmonary arteries. It has been successfully tested in more than 25 patients with pulmonary embolism in France. Before considering a request for reimbursement from the HAS it is necessary to have propective data of sufficient quality. This phase 2a prospective study is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the AngioJet ™ PE catheter use. The resulting data will allow us to submit a Phase 3 controlled study to an upcoming PHRC-type project call.
The clinical significance of pulmonary embolism (PE) limited to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries, so called isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE), remains controversial. Whether isolated SSPE represents "true" PE, a clinically more benign form of PE, a physiologic lung clearing process, or a false positive result (artifact) is currently unclear and hence, whether patients with isolated SSPE benefit from anticoagulant treatment is uncertain. Despite growing evidence from observational studies that withholding anticoagulation may be a safe option in selected patients with isolated SSPE (i.e., those without concomitant deep vein thrombosis, cancer, etc.), most patients with isolated SSPE receive anticoagulant treatment, which is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. The overall objective of the randomized controlled SAFE-SSPE trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical surveillance without anticoagulation compared to anticoagulation treatment in low-risk patients with isolated SSPE.
Acute aortic dissection is rare but potentially life-threatening disease with an incidence of 5-30 cases per million, annually. Therefore prompt diagnosis is crucial. D-dimer values have been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection. Fibrinogen levels have been shown to be low, normal or high in individuals with acute aortic dissection. This study aims to investigate whether D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio can be valuable for diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious disease associated with high mortality rates despite advanced therapeutic options. The treatment options depend on the severity of the disease and the short - term mortality varies widely from 2 to 95%, depending on the severity of the condition
Although pharmacologic and mechanical methods to prevent VTE are safe, effective, cost-effective, and advocated by authoritative guidelines,many studies continue to demonstrate that these preventive methods are significantly underutilized, especially in China.A number of quality improvements (QI) program have been established in several countries or hospitals.However,no exit effective protocol has been demonstrated well enough or adequate to drive breakthrough levels of improvement. A reliable and practical QI that can support hospitals or physicians in China is warranted.To evaluate the multifaceted quality improvement intervention effect in clinical setting, we will conduct a cluster-randomized clinical trial among China PUlmonary Thromboembolism REgistry Study (CURES) group, aiming to test whether it's applicable to real-world practice in China. A multicenter, two-arms, open-label clinical trial has been designed to determine whether the system-wide multifaceted intervention could increase the rate of at-risk participants who received prophylaxis (RP) and decrease the incidence of any hospital-associated VTE in 90 days during and after hospital admission. .Selected hospital will be regarded as a cluster and randomized into interventional or control group.In interventional group, eligible hospitalized patients will receive a variety of the multifaceted quality improvement(QI) interventions since admitted in hospital.In control group, patients will receive no more than common recommended care or an existing policy.The primary outcomes are the proportion of appropriate prophylaxis in hospitalized patients and the incidence of HA-VTE in 90 days after hospital admission.