Economic and Clinical Outcomes of Attendance in Psychosis Services Using SMS.

Psychosis Clinical Trial

— ECO APSS  

Official title:

Economic and Clinical Outcomes of Attendance in Psychosis Services Using SMS: The ECO APSS Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Unknown status

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01793220
• Other study ID #: ECOAPSS1
• Status: Unknown status
• Phase: N/A
• First received: February 14, 2013
• Last updated: February 14, 2013
• Start date: March 2013
• Est. completion date: March 2015

Study information

• Verified date: February 2013
• Source: King's College London
• Contact: Daniel P Hayes, MSc
• Phone: +44 (0) 207 848 0357
• Email: daniel.1.hayes[@]kcl.ac.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this research is to find out if mobile phone text message reminders of appointments can help to address missed appointments in Psychosis Community Services. Another aim is to examine if fewer missed appointments result in clinical benefits for service users and in lower costs for Psychosis Community Services over a period of 6 months. 600 users from 2 London Psychosis Community Services will take part in this research. Each participant will be put into one of two groups, as s/he joins the study: In the first (experimental) group, each participant will receive appointment reminders for 6 months (7 and 1 day/s before each appointment), starting with the first available opportunity upon joining the study. In the second (control) group, each participant will not receive appointment reminders for 6 months. The choice of group for each individual will be made at random by a computer. Clinical information will be collected for 6 months from the time each participant joins the study, using, with his or her consent, their anonymised electronic medical records. The following clinical information will be compared between the experimental and control groups: Attendance of appointments, number of inpatient admissions, number of days in inpatient care, number of inpatient admissions under the mental health treatment act, number of referrals to a home treatment team, number of times patient has changed medication, health and social functioning. Service use, service costs and the cost-effectiveness of the reminder system will also be examined. Towards the end of their participation, service users, as well as mental health professionals, will be invited to express their views, concerns and suggestions in relation to the reminder service by completing a brief anonymised (service users) or anonymous (staff) questionnaire

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Unknown status
• Enrollment: 600
• Est. completion date: March 2015
• Est. primary completion date: March 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Be a user of Psychosis Community Services

• Manifest at least a basic level of comprehension of the study (including its nature, purpose, procedures and implications) prior to enrollment, and adequate capacity to consent, as assessed by the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) scale.

• Own a mobile phone.

• Be willing to receive SMS reminders of appointments with the Psychosis Community Service.

• Provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Is not a user of Psychosis Community Services.

• Cannot manifest at least a basic level of comprehension of the study (including its nature, purpose, procedures and implications) prior to enrollment, and/or adequate capacity to consent, as assessed by the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) scale.

• Does not own a mobile phone.

• Is under 18 years of age.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Mental Disorders
• Psychosis
• Psychotic Disorders

Intervention

Other:
• SMS reminder
A text message reminder service will be sent 7 and 1 days(s) prior to the patients appointment at their Psychosis Community Service.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust	London	Greater London

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
King's College London

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Views and suggestions of services users in relation to the SMS reminders	At the end of their participation, service users will be invited to complete an optional brief questionnaire (designed for the purposes of the study by the research team), to express their views, concerns and suggestions in relation to the SMS service. This information will be collected in an anonymised format. The questionnaires will be posted to the study participants, or alternatively, administered to them over the telephone or in person (whichever they prefer) by a research worker.	6 months (end of study participation)
Other	Views and suggestions of mental health professionals in relation to the SMS reminders	At the end of ths study, staff from participating services will be invited to complete an optional brief questionnaire (designed for the purposes of the study by the research team), to express their views, concerns and suggestions in relation to the SMS service. This information will be collected in an anonymous format. The questionnaires will be given to staff and posted back to the researcher.	After the study has ended (1 year after 1st recruitment)
Primary	Outcome of appointment (attended, missed, cancelled by the participant, cancelled by the service)	To assess differences in appointment attendance using online patient records in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Economic outcome: Use of Psychosis Services and impact on cost	Data on the use of services over the follow-up period will be combined with appropriate unit cost information (Curtis, 2011; Department of health, 2012). Service costs will be compared between the experimental (SMS intervention) and control (No SMS intervention)groups. Cost data often follow a skewed distribution and so bootstrap methods will be employed	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Number of inpatient admissions	To assess differences in the number of inpatient admissions using online patient records in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Number of days in inpatient care	To assess differences in number of days in inpatient care using online patient records in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Number of inpatient admissions under the mental health treatment act	To assess differences in number of inpatient admissions under the mental health act using online patient records in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Number of referrals to a home treatment team	To assess differences in the number of times a patient has been referred to a home treatment team, using online patient records (a crisis team who further support those with declining mental health) in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Number of times patient has had changes to their medication	To assess differences in the number of times patient has had changes to their medication using online patient records in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	From baseline to end of intervention (6 months)
Secondary	Clinical outcome: Level of health and social functioning, as reflected in the patient's score on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)	To assess differences in levels of health and social functioning in those who receive the SMS appointment reminders and those that do not	Baseline and 6 months
Secondary	Economic outcome: cost effectiveness of the SMS intervention	The cost of the actual intervention will be negligible given the extent of general SMS use. However, there could be an impact on service costs and this will be estimated. Data on the use of services over the follow-up period (see below for details) will be combined with appropriate unit cost information (Curtis, 2011; Department of health, 2012). Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by combining the cost data with HoNOS scores using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimates will be explored using cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.	1 year after baseline