Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06406959
Other study ID # 2
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2024
Est. completion date March 31, 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Contact Taras Nechay, MD
Phone +79268146829
Email tnechay@mail.ru
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is devoted to the impact of preemptive regional Transversus abdominal plane block on the postoperative acute and chronic pain after elective Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.


Description:

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common elective interventions in general surgery. Approximately 20 million inguinal hernia repairs are performed worldwide every year. Laparo-endoscopic techniques provide faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective compared to open one. Nevertheless, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can result in moderate to severe pain in the early postoperative period, interfering the time of returning to normal activity in a substantial quantity of patients. To reduce pain and to accelerate recovery, local and regional anesthetics has been successfully implemented into the daily routine of abdominal surgeries. Recent systematic reviews have shown that TAP block can reduce analgetic consumption and acute pain scores after inguinal hernia repair. However, most included studies were conducted on patients with open hernia surgery or total extra peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Some studies showed the benefit of TAP block for early pain control following TAPP. Most of them were retrospective, some conducted with exclusion of obese or comorbid patients, some in mixed groups without separating patients with TAPP and TEP. Thus, the evidence of TAP block efficiency prior to hernia repair in TAPP technique are of low quality. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) develops in up to 6% of patients after TAPP. Several studies have found that intense acute postoperative pain is a risk factor for CPIP after IHR. The investigators hypothesize, that preemptive TAP block temporary stops nociception and central sensitization from the surgical site thus reduce acute postoperative pain that theoretically provoke reducing the incidence of CPIP following IHR. Two studies suggest that TAP block may influence the incidence of CPIP after TAPP. Considering the retrospective study design of both and the insufficient sample size further randomized clinical trials are mandatory to estimate this hypothesis. The aim of our study is to explore the possibilities of reducing acute and chronic pain after TAPP via implementation TAP block. The sample size was calculated based on the randomized controlled trial data of patients after TEP IHR where postoperative VAS score at 4 h on coughing was 4.7±1.5 in the preemptive local anesthesia group and 6.1±1.9 in the control group. A sample size of 39 patients was required for each subgroup (total=78 patients) with a type I error rate α=0.05 and type II error rate β=0.1.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 78
Est. completion date March 31, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia who are scheduled for elective Transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) - Signed Informed consent to participation - ASA I-III - BMI =35 kg/m2 Non-inclusion Criteria: - Inguinoscrotal hernia (hernia passing through the entrance to the scrotum) - Previously diagnosed mental disorders - Patients receiving psychotropic drugs and drugs affecting adrenal cortex function (estrogens and systemic glucocorticoids) - Language barrier Exclusion Criteria: - Deviations during the operation/anesthesia that required transfer to the intensive care unit or conversion to open surgery - Refusal to participate

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Transversus abdominal plane block (TAP block)
Unilateral US-guided TAP-block lateral approach with 20 ml 0,375% Levobupivacaine before incision

Locations

Country Name City State
Russian Federation Department of faculty surgery ?1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Moscow

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Russian Federation, 

References & Publications (12)

Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H. Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):957-69. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d31ff8. — View Citation

Arora S, Chhabra A, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Misra MC, Bansal VK. Transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 May 28. — View Citation

Chamzin A, Frountzas M, Gkiokas G, Kouskouni E, Xanthos T, Michalopoulos NV. The Effect of Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocking on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Groin Hernia Repair. Front Surg. 2022 Feb 8;9:834050. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.834050. eCollection 2022. — View Citation

Gao T, Zhang JJ, Xi FC, Shi JL, Lu Y, Tan SJ, Yu WK. Evaluation of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Hernia Surgery: A Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):369-375. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000412. — View Citation

HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12. — View Citation

Hosni M, Soulios, JP, Francart, D. Ultrasound transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local infiltration analgesia for acute and chronic postoperative pain control after laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica. 2020; 71(4), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.56126/71.4.2

Hubbard G, Hubert C, Vudayagiri L, Tullington J, Merino K, Vaidya A, Gemma R. Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review. Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1059-1065. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02831-x. Epub 2023 Jul 3. — View Citation

Kim MG, Kim SI, Ok SY, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Park SY, Lee SM, Jung BI. The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Sep;63(3):227-32. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.3.227. Epub 2012 Sep 14. — View Citation

Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, Berndt N, De Santo G, Aljedani N, Ortiz P, Gauger U, Boettge K, Anders S, Full H, Strik MW. The transversus abdominis plane block reduces the cumulative need of analgesic medication following inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique: a retrospective single center analysis among 838 patients. Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1371-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02156-z. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Erratum In: Hernia. 2020 Jun 9;: — View Citation

Paasch C, Fiebelkorn J, De Santo G, Azarhoush S, Boettge K, Anders S, Gauger U, Strik M. The transversus abdominis plane block may reduce chronic postoperative pain one year after TAPP ingunial hernia repair. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 23;55:190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.011. eCollection 2020 Jul. — View Citation

Reinpold W. Risk factors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Innov Surg Sci. 2017 May 12;2(2):61-68. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0017. eCollection 2017 Jun. — View Citation

Takebayashi K, Matsumura M, Kawai Y, Hoashi T, Katsura N, Fukuda S, Shimizu K, Inada T, Sato M. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Int Surg. 2015 Apr;100(4):666-71. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00193.1. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Acute postoperative pain 4h Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing. 4±1 hours postop
Secondary Acute postoperative pain 2h Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing. 2±1 hours postop
Secondary Acute postoperative pain 6h Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing. 6±1 hours postop
Secondary Number of Participants meeting discharge criteria Blood pressure =100/60 mm Hg; Activation within the department; Ability to oral medication (no postoperative nausea and vomiting); Pain (NRS) =3 points; No signs of complications (bleeding, early relapse) 6±1 hours postop
Secondary Analgetic consumption (dose quantity) At NRS score 4-6 at rest patients receive: 30mg Ketorolak IV no more than once every 8 hours or 1000mg Acetaminophen IV no more than once every 6 hours; At NRS score =7 at rest patients receive 100 mg Tramadol IV no more than once every 12 hours; The number of analgesic doses administered is counted. 24 hours postop
Secondary Concentration of serum cortisol nmol/L At 8 am on the day of surgery, 4±1 hours postop
Secondary Acute postoperative pain 24h Pain score will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) at rest and on coughing.
Participants verbally requested to rate their pain: "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
24±3 hours postop
Secondary Length of stay Days From date of hospitalization until the date of discharge
Secondary Number of Participants with postoperative complications Number of Participants with postoperative complications, evaluated by Clavien-Dindo classification (telephone survey) Postoperative 30 (±3) days
Secondary Patient satisfaction score Patient satisfaction with treatment is assessed by telephone survey using the Linkert-type scale (1 - less satisfaction, 5 - more satisfaction) Postoperative 30 (±3) days
Secondary Number of Participants with chronic pain Pain score will be assessed by NRS (telephone survey). Participants verbally requested to rate their pain: "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain. Postoperative 90 (±3) days
Secondary Number of Participants with recurrence Participants undergo a telephone survey. Participants presenting with characteristic complaints are invited for examination and ultrasound scan. After 90 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03488342 - Rives Technique Versus Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia N/A
Terminated NCT01596049 - The Efficacy of a Self-fixating Mesh in Unilateral Open Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Terminated NCT01984996 - Freedom Inguinal Hernia Repair System Study N/A