View clinical trials related to Prematurity.
Filter by:The 2016 WHO antenatal care guidelines stated that pregnant women in undernourished populations should receive fortified balanced energy-protein (BEP) supplements to reduce the risk of stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age birth. However, acceptable supplements and delivery channels must be determined for different contexts. The present proposal therefore will 1) perform a formative study to identify the most suitable (acceptability and utilization) BEP supplement for pregnant women in rural Burkina Faso (phase 1) and 2) evaluate the efficacy of this supplement to improve birth weight, fetal and infant growth (phase 2). The nutritional composition of the BEP supplement was established during an expert convening at the BMGF in September 2016. Private sector partners will prepare the supplements in the selected forms with the recommended nutrient composition.
A prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial will be conducted from July 2018 to October 2020. Approximately 300 preterm infants will be enrolled across three sites: Duke University Medical Center, the University of North Carolina, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Eligible infants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 2-month US licensed childhood vaccines (PCV13, DTaP, HBV, IPV an Hib) or no vaccines. After their participation in the study, healthcare providers of the infants in the unvaccinated group will make decision abut receipt of their 2-month childhood vaccines. The study will collect data from the continuous cardiorespiratory and pulse oximetry monitors from randomization to 48 hours after randomization for infants in the unvaccinated group, and from randomization to 48 hours after vaccination for infants in the vaccinated group. Infants in both groups will be monitored for up to 60 hours for the occurrence of apnea, bradycardia, and oxygen desaturation. For infants in the "vaccinated" group, the study will also collect adverse events of clinical interest and serious adverse events occurring between the end of the 48-hour monitoring period and 14 days after vaccination. This information will be collected through parental report and review of medical records.
Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs.It may increase tidal volume, improve gas exchange and reduce work of breathing. However, NIPPV may associate with patient-ventilator asynchrony that can cause poor tolerance and risk of intubation. It may also in increased risk of pneumothorax and bowel perforation because of increase in intrathoracic pressure. On the other hand, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a newer mode of ventilation, which has the potential to overcome these challenges. It uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a signal to synchronise the mechanical ventilatory breaths and deliver an inspiratory pressure based on this electrical activity. Comparing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in preterm infants, has shown that NI-NAVA improved the synchronization between patient and ventilator and decreased diaphragm work of breathing . There is lack of data on the use of NI-NAVA in neonates post extubation in the literature. To date, no study has focused on short-term impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the need of additional ventilatory support post extubation of NI-NAVA and NIPPV and also the risk of developing adverse outcomes. Aim: The aim is to compare NI-NAVA & NIPPV in terms of extubation failure in infants< 32 weeks gestation. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesized that infants born prematurely < 32 weeks gestation who extubated to NI-NAVA have a lower risk of extubation failure and need of additional ventilatory support.
Premature infants are at increased risk of developing cerebral palsy (CP). Early interventions for at risk infants have the potential to decrease disease severity and improve quality of life. All infants demonstrate general movements (GMs), which are reliable indicators of brain function and can be reproducibly evaluated using the General Movement Assessment (GMA) tool. Prior studies have demonstrated the impact of early maternal-driven intervention strategies on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Investigators have shown that interventions promoting the establishment of emotional connection between the infant and his or her mother, including mother/infant calming sessions with scent cloth exchange, vocal soothing, eye contact, and kangaroo care, can impact neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months. Investigators have also shown that 60 minutes of kangaroo care leads to decreasing levels of the stress hormone cortisol in both mothers and infants. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of a maternal-driven early intervention bundle in preterm infants with abnormal GMA.
The aim of this novel health services research proposal is to assess the longer-term outcomes, to 6 months corrected age, of an adapted Family Integrated Care (FICare) model of care for moderate and late preterm infants admitted to a Level II neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). This follow-up study will enroll infants at 6 months CA (± 1 month) recruited to the original FICare randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02879799) from four level II NICU sites; two intervention and two control.
This study will evaluate a new neonatal follow-up model that offers additional support and coping resources for parents during their child's NICU admission as well as during their transition home. The Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT) model involves a key worker who will be the primary support for families during the first year of their child's life. The key worker's role involves 1) parental coaching using an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy approach, 2) coordinating care across various levels of care as well as supporting families in system and resource navigation, and 3) provided proactive education targeting normal challenges in caring for a child who required intensive care support. The goal is to improve the psychosocial support and medical care coordination beyond the neonatal intensive care unit as many of the medical and social concerns do not end at the time of discharge. Primary objective is parent stress at 12 months.
The aim is to validate a FTIR spectroscopy test for measuring lung maturity/Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in terms of safety, usability, and efficacy. The purpose is to accurately predict RDS using Lecithin/Sphingomyelin ratio (L/S ratio determined by a rapid FTIR test on fresh gastric aspirates) using retrospective analysis. Research question: "In very preterm newborn infants with (risk of) respiratory distress who have not received prophylactic surfactant: does analysis of L/S-ratio in fresh gastric aspirates using a rapid FTIR test predict RDS requiring exogenous surfactant with sufficient specificity and sensitivity to be clinical useful?
This clinical trial will evaluate the effects of giving supplements of PUFA to premature infants.
In the UK, babies receive their vaccinations according to a standard schedule, irrespective of their gestation at birth. This policy is designed so that all babies are protected as early as possible from vaccine preventable diseases such as polio, diphtheria, tetanus, rotavirus, pertussis (whooping cough), Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease and now meningococcal B disease. The 4CMenB vaccination (Bexsero®) was added to the UK schedule in September 2015 and there has been no research looking at whether the vaccine gives the same protection to babies born early as it does to those born at term. The Investigators want to compare two different schedules of 4CMenB and see if one gives better protection to babies born prematurely. It is possible that an extra 4CMenB dose (i.e. three doses in early infancy instead of two) will offer better protection for premature babies. This is what the Investigators are trying to find out through this study.
The study aims to compare routine assessment of gastric residuals versus no assessment of residuals in preterm neonates with respect to time taken for achieving full enteral feeding and the incidence of possible complications, such as feeding intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis etc.