Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of the study is to determine whether administration of vitamin C (1.5g/6 hours) in the first three days post-partum reduces the amount of extravascular lung water assessed by lung ultrasound in patients with severe preeclampsia.


Clinical Trial Description

Risk of fluid over-resuscitation is high in preeclampsia due to endothelial dysfunction and resulting increased vascular permeability. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in the UK reported six maternal deaths between 1994 and 1996 due to adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that appeared to be related to poor fluid management in women with preeclampsia. On the basis of these reported deaths, recommendations on limiting intravenous fluids to not more than to 80 ml/hour (or 1 ml/kg/h) have been made. Nevertheless, preeclampsia remains the leading cause of pulmonary edema in the peripartum period. Moreover, in some preeclamptic patients higher rates of intravenous fluid administration may be necessary to adequately correct tissue hypoperfusion.

Zieleskiewicz et al. were the first to demonstrate that lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to objectively evaluate increased extravascular lung water (EVLW) in patients with preeclampsia. Ambrozic et al. recently confirmed these results and showed that the amount of EVLW assessed by LUS is increased in preeclamptic patients compared to healthy controls and that it decreases rapidly in the first four days following delivery.

It has been reported that administration of high-dose ascorbic acid (vitamin C) reduces vascular permeability in animals. In 2000, Tanaka et al. reported an RCT involving 37 patients with major burns (>30% body surface area) randomized regarding whether or not to receive an infusion of IV vitamin C, 66 mg/kg/h for the first 24 hours of hospitalization. Patients in the vitamin C group required less fluid resuscitation, had higher urine output, and developed less wound edema. This translated into improved oxygenation and less time on mechanical ventilation among the vitamin C group (average of 12 vs. 21 days of ventilation, p=0.03). In 2002, Nathens et al. randomized patients shortly after admission to a surgical ICU to no therapy vs. a combination of enteral vitamin E plus IV vitamin C 1000 mg/8h until ICU discharge. The primary endpoint was a composite of pneumonia or ARDS. Although there were trends towards fewer pulmonary complications among patients treated with antioxidants, these did not reach statistical significance (the study was underpowered due to low rates of respiratory complications). However, patients treated with vitamins E and C fared better on a variety of secondary endpoints including less time on the ventilator and less multiorgan failure.

In women with established preeclampsia, there is evidence of oxidative stress and decreased concentrations of vitamin C. An initial RCT on prophylactic supplementation with oral antioxidants, including 1g vitamin C daily, showed a significant reduction in preeclampsia (8 percent vs. 17 percent) in high-risk pregnancies. Subsequent large RCTs have, however, reported no significant reduction in the risks of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, or the risk of death or other serious outcomes in infants associated with oral vitamin C supplementation.There are no studies to date on use of higher dose IV vitamin C administration for reduction of capillary leak and consequently EVLW in patients with severe forms of preeclampsia. Given the safety (see below) and low costs of vitamin C this could be a promising approach to increase fluid tolerance in these patients. If vitamin C reduces vascular permeability in preeclampsia patients to the same degree that it seems to reduce vascular permeability in other conditions, such as burns, it could reduce the risk of pulmonary complications associated with this disease. At the same time, vitamin C therapy could allow safe additional fluid administration in patients with preeclampsia who are fluid responsive and in whom further increases in preload would be beneficial for preventing end-organ damage such as pre-renal acute kidney injury.

Safety of vitamin C

Safety of vitamin C has been well established even at high doses. For example, none of the above studies reported any adverse event, despite the use of very high doses by Tanaka et al. (1.6 grams/kg over 24 hours). One potential concern regarding vitamin C is that it may be metabolized into oxalic acid, leading to calcium oxalate nephropathy. This doesn't seem to be a significant problem for several reasons:

- Oxalate formation is a dose-dependent toxicity. This has rarely been reported from short courses of IV vitamin C, but only at much higher doses (>40 grams/day).

- In 2014, Fowler et al. published a phase I safety trial of vitamin C in patients with severe sepsis. Their prospective RCT involved patients with severe sepsis in a medical ICU. 24 patients were randomized to receive placebo, low-dose vitamin C (12.5 mg/kg IV/6hr), or high-dose vitamin C (50 mg/kg IV/6hr). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, with no adverse events noted.

- Recently Marik et al. published a before-after study investigating the impact of treating sepsis with a combination of thiamine 200 mg IV/12hr, Vitamin C 1.5 g/6hr, and hydrocortisone 50 mg IV/6hr. Mortality was substantially reduced in patients receiving vitamin C (p<0.001). Moreover, vitamin C use correlated with improved renal outcomes (the rate of dialysis was reduced from 33% to 10%, p=0.02).

Another concern which has been raised is that vitamin C at extremely high doses may have a pro-oxidant effect. This was shown not to occur even at a dose of 7.5 grams IV daily. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03451266
Study type Interventional
Source University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 1
Start date April 7, 2018
Completion date June 27, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT04243278 - Postpartum Low-Dose Aspirin After Preeclampsia for Optimization of Cardiovascular Risk (PAPVASC) Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT03318211 - Discontinuation of Magnesium Sulfate After Delivery in Women With Severe Preeclampsia. A Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT05594056 - Transorbital Ultrasound of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Between Healthy Pregnant Women and Those With Severe Preeclampsia. N/A
Recruiting NCT03761888 - Nicardipine and Labetalol Effects on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Preeclampsia
Not yet recruiting NCT06373367 - Preeclampsia Educational Program Study (PrEPS) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04855513 - Prevention of Pre-eclampsia Using Metformin: a Randomized Control Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05232994 - Metformin and Esomeprazole For Preterm Pre-eclampsia Phase 1
Completed NCT04392375 - Nifedipine XL Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Preeclampsia With Severe Features During Induction of Labor Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03978767 - Preeclampsia And Nonsteroidal Drugs for Analgesia: a Randomized Non Inferiority Trial Phase 2
Completed NCT04236258 - Comparing Nifedipine and Enalapril in Medical Resources Used in the Postpartum Period Phase 4
Completed NCT04756661 - Uterotonics for Severe Preeclampsia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04660032 - Nudge to Drive Transitions of Care N/A
Completed NCT04103489 - The Use of Eculizumab in HELLP Syndrome Phase 1
Enrolling by invitation NCT04794855 - Risk Prediction Model of Preeclampsia
Recruiting NCT04311749 - Expanded NIPT for Pregnancy Complications
Active, not recruiting NCT06359015 - Metformin and Esomeprazole in Preterm Pre-eclampsia Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05610774 - Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Pre-Eclamptic Parturient Receiving Magnesium Sulfate Combined With Dexmedetomidine N/A
Completed NCT03815110 - Preeclampsia Risk Assessment: Evaluation of Cut-offs to Improve Stratification
Completed NCT03210350 - Effect of Magnesium Sulphate on the Intracranial Pressure of Preeclamptic Patients
Active, not recruiting NCT06360601 - Intravenous Labetalol Versus Hydralazine in Preeclampsia Phase 1/Phase 2