Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03065530
Other study ID # 2015-SR-203
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date February 7, 2017
Est. completion date October 5, 2017

Study information

Verified date January 2020
Source The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Nervous, anxiety, fear and other psychological reactions always appears in parturients during cesarean section. This study intends to investigate the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with butorphanol tartrate for postoperative analgesia and breastfeeding after caesarean section.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 120
Est. completion date October 5, 2017
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 24 Years to 45 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Parturients who had successfully breastfed a prior infant and planned to breastfeed after this delivery were screened for eligibility.

2. Parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia

3. ASA I and II parturients aged 18-45 years, with singleton gestation.

4. Parturients with verbal and written mandarin

5. Parturients who want to use PCA intravenous analgesia and can use the pump correctly

6. written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Multiple gestation.

2. A history of allergy to dexmedetomidine or other study drugs

3. Cardiovascular disease (basic HR<50bpm or SBP<100mmHg)

4. Opioid drugs abuse.

5. BMI more than 35 kg/m2

6. Conditions that preclude spinal anesthesia.

7. Preeclampsia or epilepsy.

8. A history of neuromuscular disease.

9. Epidural anaesthesia was unsuccessful.

10. The parturients, whose surgery ended after 11 a.m.

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Normal Saline
Drug: Normal saline control group receive NS after delivery. Drug: butorphanol tartrate PCA: butorphanol tartrate after cesarean section.
Dexmedetomidine 0.03ug/kg/h
Drug: Dexmedetomidine This group receive Dex 0.5ug/kg after delivery. Drug: butorphanol tartrate and Dexmedetomidine. PCA: butorphanol tartrate with 0.03ug/kg/h Dexmedetomidine after cesarean section.
Dexmedetomidine 0.05ug/kg/h
Drug: Dexmedetomidine This group receive Dex 0.5ug/kg after delivery. Drug: butorphanol tartrate and Dexmedetomidine. PCA: butorphanol tartrate with 0.05ug/kg/h Dexmedetomidine after cesarean section.
Dexmedetomidine 0.08ug/kg/h
Drug: Dexmedetomidine This group receive Dex 0.5ug/kg after delivery. Drug: butorphanol tartrate and Dexmedetomidine. PCA: butorphanol tartrate with 0.08ug/kg/h Dexmedetomidine after cesarean section.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (30)

Abu-Halaweh SA, Al Oweidi AK, Abu-Malooh H, Zabalawi M, Alkazaleh F, Abu-Ali H, Ramsay MA. Intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion for labour analgesia in patient with preeclampsia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jan;26(1):86-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b000e000000f3fb. — View Citation

Anttila M, Penttilä J, Helminen A, Vuorilehto L, Scheinin H. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;56(6):691-3. — View Citation

Arain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):153-8, table of contents. — View Citation

Chen Z, Tang R, Zhang R, Jiang Y, Liu Y. Effects of dexmedetomidine administered for postoperative analgesia on sleep quality in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 — View Citation

Chow CK, Koren G. Sedating drugs and breastfeeding. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Mar;61(3):241-3. — View Citation

Colin PJ, Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Reyntjens KMEM, Absalom AR, Vereecke HEM, Struys MMRF. Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1 — View Citation

Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109-17. Review. — View Citation

Deussen AR, Ashwood P, Martis R. Analgesia for relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD004908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004908.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011. Epub — View Citation

El-Tahan MR, Mowafi HA, Al Sheikh IH, Khidr AM, Al-Juhaiman RA. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in suppressing cardiovascular and hormonal responses to general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a dose-response study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Jul;21(3):222- — View Citation

Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):699-705. — View Citation

Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, Keifer JC, Sum-Ping ST, Moretti EW, Young CC, Wright DR, Macleod DB, Somma J. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I: crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volun — View Citation

Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, Bratty JR, Takala J; Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation Investigators. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized c — View Citation

Jiang W, Wang Q, Xu M, Li Y, Yang R, Song X, Duan H, Zhang P. Assessment of different loading doses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in preventing adverse reaction after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jun;13(6):2946-2950. doi: 10. — View Citation

Kainu JP, Halmesmäki E, Korttila KT, Sarvela PJ. Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery and Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1535-1545. — View Citation

Kelly LE, Chaudhry SA, Rieder MJ, 't Jong G, Moretti ME, Lausman A, Ross C, Berger H, Carleton B, Hayden MR, Madadi P, Koren G. A clinical tool for reducing central nervous system depression among neonates exposed to codeine through breast milk. PLoS One. — View Citation

Lin TF, Yeh YC, Lin FS, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ, Fan SZ. Effect of combining dexmedetomidine and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jan;102(1):117-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen320. Epub 2008 Nov 5. — View Citation

Lind JN, Perrine CG, Li R. Relationship between use of labor pain medications and delayed onset of lactation. J Hum Lact. 2014 May;30(2):167-73. doi: 10.1177/0890334413520189. Epub 2014 Jan 22. — View Citation

Nakanishi R, Yoshimura M, Suno M, Yamamoto K, Ito H, Uchimine Y, Toriumi T, Kurosawa A, Sugawara A, Kunisawa T. Detection of dexmedetomidine in human breast milk using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to a study of drug safety i — View Citation

Newton ER, Hale TW. Drugs in Breast Milk. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;58(4):868-84. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000142. Review. — View Citation

Nie Y, Liu Y, Luo Q, Huang S. Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for post-caesarean section intravenous analgesia: a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr;31(4):197-203. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000011. — View Citation

Orbach-Zinger S, Fireman S, Ben-Haroush A, Karoush T, Klein Z, Mazarib N, Artyukh A, Chen R, Ioscovich A, Eidelman LA, Landau R. Preoperative sleep quality predicts postoperative pain after planned caesarean delivery. Eur J Pain. 2017 May;21(5):787-794. d — View Citation

Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. Review. — View Citation

Ren C, Chi M, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Qi F, Liu Z. Dexmedetomidine in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(32):e1348. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001348 — View Citation

Schnabel A, Meyer-Frießem CH, Reichl SU, Zahn PK, Pogatzki-Zahn EM. Is intraoperative dexmedetomidine a new option for postoperative pain treatment? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2013 Jul;154(7):1140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03 — View Citation

Sia AT, Kwek K, Yeo GS. The in vitro effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on human myometrium. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Apr;14(2):104-7. — View Citation

Sia AT, Sng BL. Intravenous dexmedetomidine for obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia: converting a challenge into an opportunity? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jul;18(3):204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 May 22. — View Citation

Wang C, Liu S, Han C, Yu M, Hu Y, Liu C. Effect and placental transfer of dexmedetomidine during caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. J Int Med Res. 2017 Jun;45(3):964-972. doi: 10.1177/0300060517698330. Epub 2017 Apr 28. — View Citation

Yoshimura M, Kunisawa T, Suno M, Sugawara A, Kurosawa A, Nakanishi R, Aoki K, Toriumi T. Intravenous dexmedetomidine for cesarean delivery and its concentration in colostrum. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017 Nov;32:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.05.002. Epub 20 — View Citation

Yu M, Han C, Jiang X, Wu X, Yu L, Ding Z. Effect and Placental Transfer of Dexmedetomidine During Caesarean Section Under General Anaesthesia. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Sep;117(3):204-8. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12389. Epub 2015 Mar 4. — View Citation

* Note: There are 30 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) at Rest visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS at rest was assessed when the patient was in supine position 6h after cesarean section.
Secondary Relative Infant Dose (RID) of Dexmedetomidine Relative infant dose (RID) =Dose (infant, mg•kg-1•day-1) /Dose (mother, mg•kg-1•day-1) µg·kg-1·h-1. The Dose (infant) in mg•kg-1 is calculated by multiplying the concentration of the drug in breast milk by the volume of breast milk consumed daily (about 150 mL•kg-1). 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) at Rest visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS at rest was assessed when the patient was in supine position 12h after cesarean section.
Secondary Ramsay Sedation Score(RSS) Sedation intensity measured with RSS is recorded at the 6, 12 24 and 48 h after cesarean section. Sedation was assessed by the Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS) (1, anxious patient; 2, cooperative and tranquil; 3, responding to command; 4, brisk response to stimulus; 5, sluggish response to stimulus; 6, no response to stimulus). 6h after cesarean section.
Secondary The Degree of Satisfaction The degree of satisfaction (0, very satisfied; 1, satisfied; 2, moderately satisfied; 3, not satisfied) was evaluated at 48 h after surgery. The number of overall satisfied patients (satisfied and very satisfied) is reported. 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Number of Participants That Experienced Nausea or Vomiting Total times during 48h after cesarean section. 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Ramsay Sedation Score(RSS) Sedation intensity measured with RSS is recorded at the 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after cesarean section. Sedation was assessed by the Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS) (1, anxious patient; 2, cooperative and tranquil; 3, responding to command; 4, brisk response to stimulus; 5, sluggish response to stimulus; 6, no response to stimulus). 12h after cesarean section.
Secondary Ramsay Sedation Score(RSS) Sedation intensity measured with RSS is recorded at the 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after cesarean section. Sedation was assessed by the Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS) (1, anxious patient; 2, cooperative and tranquil; 3, responding to command; 4, brisk response to stimulus; 5, sluggish response to stimulus; 6, no response to stimulus). 24h after cesarean section.
Secondary Ramsay Sedation Score(RSS) Sedation intensity measured with RSS is recorded at the 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after cesarean section. Sedation was assessed by the Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS) (1, anxious patient; 2, cooperative and tranquil; 3, responding to command; 4, brisk response to stimulus; 5, sluggish response to stimulus; 6, no response to stimulus). 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) at Rest visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS at rest was assessed when the patient was in supine position 24h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS at rest was assessed when the patient was in supine position 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Movement visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS on movement was assessed when patients changed from supine to lateral position. 6h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Movement visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS on movement was assessed when patients changed from supine to lateral position. 12h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Movement visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS on movement was assessed when patients changed from supine to lateral position. 24h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Movement visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS on movement was assessed when patients changed from supine to lateral position. 48h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Uterine Cramping visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS-C was assessed when the patient required oxytocin after surgery in supine position 6h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Uterine Cramping visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS-C was assessed when the patient required oxytocin after surgery in supine position 12h after cesarean section.
Secondary Postoperative Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) on Uterine Cramping visual analogue scale (VAS; with 0, no pain; to 10, the worst imaginable pain) is a validated assessing scale for pain intensity. VAS-C was assessed when the patient required oxytocin after surgery in supine position 24h after cesarean section.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04633850 - Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
Recruiting NCT03181620 - Sedation Administration Timing: Intermittent Dosing Reduces Time to Extubation N/A
Completed NCT04579354 - Virtual Reality (VR) Tour to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Before Anaesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT06007378 - Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05943015 - Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum, Paravertebral Blocks N/A
Completed NCT04544228 - Ketamine or Neostigmine for Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy N/A
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT03663478 - Continuous TQL Block for Elective Cesarean Section Phase 4
Completed NCT04176822 - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period N/A
Completed NCT05170477 - Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04561856 - Fascia Iliaca Block Supplemented With Perineural Vs Intravenous Dexamethasone Phase 4
Completed NCT06425601 - A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy N/A
Completed NCT03612947 - TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Phase 2
Completed NCT05974501 - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Phase 4
Completed NCT05995912 - Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib-tramadol Tablet in Acute Postoperative Pain Phase 2
Completed NCT04571515 - Dose-Response Study of MR-107A-01 in The Treatment of Post-Surgical Dental Pain Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04190355 - The Effect of Irrigant Types Used During Endodontic Treatment on Postoperative Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05145153 - Incidence of Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery
Recruiting NCT03697278 - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) N/A