Inter-semispinal Plane Block and Cervical Spine Surgery

Post Operative Pain Clinical Trial

— ISPB  

Official title:

Inter-semispinal Plane (ISP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06003933
• Other study ID #: m644
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 3, 2023
• Est. completion date: September 10, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Fayoum University Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block is a novel ultrasound-guided technique that involves local anesthetic injection into the fascial plane between the semispinalis cervicis and semispinalis capitis muscles with subsequent block of the dorsal rami of the cervical spinal nerves and hence can get adequate postoperative analgesia.

The authors hypothesized that ISP block can reduce the postoperative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgeries.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ISP block in patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery.

Description:

This study will be performed in the in the Fayoum University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. The study design will be double-blind randomized controlled study . A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible patients before recruitment and randomization.

Patients were randomly allocated into two groups using computer generated sequence and concealed in sealed opaque envelopes.

Control group (C): patients received general anesthesia only. Inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block group: patients received bilateral ultrasound guided ISP block at the level of C5.

All patients will be assessed Preoperative VAS score then premedicated orally with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg 30 min prior to surgery. All patients were monitored by 5 lead ECG, pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure and capnography and an intravenous (IV) access will be established.

The technique of general anesthesia will be standardized for all patients. General anesthesia will be induced by intravenous (IV) 2 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl induction. After IV atracurium 0.5 mg/kg, orotracheal intubation was performed. Anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane (1.2%-1.5%) in oxygen-air mixture (50%-50%). Muscle relaxation will be maintained during the procedure with atracurium in increments.

After induction of general anesthesia, ISP blocks will be performed in the allocated group with the patient in the prone position. In both groups, the treating anesthesiologist left the operating room while another anesthesiologist experienced in ultrasound guided nerve block techniques; with no subsequent role in the study; either performed the ISP blocks in the ISP group, or just prepared the skin and scanned the site of the block using the ultrasound probe in the control group. Fifteen minutes will be awaited in all patients before the surgical procedure was allowed to start.

fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV will be administered in case of inadequate analgesia as indicated by >20% increase in heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption will be recorded.

All anesthetics will be discontinued at the end of the surgical procedure. Extubation will be performed when spontaneous breathing was adequate and following prompt reversal using 0.05 mg/kg of neostigmine and 0.02 mg/kg of atropine. At the end of surgery, paracetamol 1 g will be administered IV to be repeated every 6 h postoperatively. Patients will be transferred to the PACU where HR, respiratory rate, SpO2 and systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were monitored.

Sample size was calculated using G* Power 3.1.7.9 software program. Calculation of the sample size was based on the VAS value measured at different time points. Based on the results of a study by Mostafa et al, the authors calculated the sample size to be able to detect a difference in VAS score of 10 points with an effect size of 0.8. Using the previous data, at least 23 patients in each group were required to detect a significance difference in the postoperative pethidine consumption at α value of 0.05 and study power of 90%. The authors decided to recruit 25 patients in each group to compensate for any possible withdrawals. The sample size calculation was based on a 2-sample independent t-test (2-sided)

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: September 10, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: August 15, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient refusal

• Patients with any contraindication to regional anesthesia (e.g. local infection, coagulation abnormality)

• Known allergy to local anesthetics

• Previous cervical disc surgery or fixation

• Mental disorders

• Drug or alcohol abuse.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cervical Spine Instability
• Pain, Postoperative
• Post Operative Pain

Intervention

Drug:
• Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side of cervical region at C5
• Lidocaine Hydrochloride
10ml xylocaine on each side of cervical region at C5

Device:
• Ultrasound
The same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block.The five-layered posterior cervical muscles were identified at the level of C5 with a 6-15-MHz linear probe oriented in the transverse plane (SonoSite Edge, Bothell, Washington). The fifth cervical spine was counted from the C7 spinous process with the probe sliding cranially.
• Needle
the needle (22- G, 50-mm block needle (Visioplex, Vygon) was introduced in-plane through the skin and advanced into the fascial plane between the semispinalis cervicis and semispinalis capitis muscles. After negative aspiration for blood, 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% was injected5.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Fayoum University Hospital	Fayoum	Faiyum

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Yasser S Mostafa, MD

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (3)

Kurd MF, Kreitz T, Schroeder G, Vaccaro AR. The Role of Multimodal Analgesia in Spine Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Apr;25(4):260-268. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00049. — View Citation

Lumawig JM, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K. Dose-dependent inhibition of diclofenac sodium on posterior lumbar interbody fusion rates. Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.455. Epub 2008 Sep 14. — View Citation

Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Age	in years	1 hour preoperatively
Other	body mass index	kg/m2	1 hour preoperatively
Primary	postoperative rescue pethidine consumption	in milligram	48 hours after operation
Secondary	Postoperative visual analog pain score (VAS score)	0 to 10 scale as 0: no pain and 10:worst degree of pain	4 hours postoperatively
Secondary	Postoperative visual analog pain score (VAS score)	0 to 10 scale as 0: no pain and 10:worst degree of pain	8 hours postoperatively
Secondary	Postoperative visual analog pain score (VAS score)	0 to 10 scale as 0: no pain and 10:worst degree of pain	12 hours postoperatively
Secondary	Postoperative visual analog pain score (VAS score)	0 to 10 scale as 0: no pain and 10:worst degree of pain	24 hours postoperatively
Secondary	Postoperative visual analog pain score (VAS score)	0 to 10 scale as 0: no pain and 10:worst degree of pain	48 hours postoperatively
Secondary	time to first rescue analgesic request	in milligram	1 minute after requiring analgesics
Secondary	Intraoperative fentanyl consumption	in microgram	1 minute after surgery.
Secondary	Occurrence of postoperative nausea	yes or no	2 hours after operation
Secondary	Occurrence of postoperative vomiting	yes or no	2 hours after operation
Secondary	Occurrence of postoperative pruritis	yes or no	2 hours after operation