View clinical trials related to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure.
Filter by:The investigators aim to assess the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on diaphragmatic activity evaluated through ultrasound in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) assisted via invasive mechanical ventilation in assisted mode.
PEEP titration is a recommended during invasive mechanical ventilation of ICU patients. However, little is known about the right way to conduct this titration. PEEP titration can be conducted by a stepwise increase in PEEP level, or following an ARM and a consecutive stepwise decrease in PEEP level. Those 2 methods will be explored in intubated ICU patients either with healthy lung or ARDS lungs. Physiological exploration will include end-expiratory lung volume measurements, driving pressure, compliance and electro-impedance tomography at each PEEP level.
Pulmonary complications are the most common complication in thoracic surgery and the leading cause of mortality.Therefore, lung protection is utmost important, and protective ventilation is strongly recommended in thoracic surgery. Protective ventilation is a prevailing ventilatory strategy in these days and is comprised of small tidal volume, limited inspiratory pressure, and application of positive end-expiratory pressure. However, several retrospective studies recently suggested that tidal volume, inspiratory pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure are not related to patient outcomes, or only related when they influenced the driving pressure. Recently, the investigators reported the first prospective study about the driving pressure-guided ventilation in thoracic surgery. PEEP was titrated to bring the lowest driving pressure in each patient and applied throughout the one lung ventilation. The application of individualized PEEP reduced the incidence of pulmonary complications.However, that study was small size single center study with 312 patients. Thus, investigators try to perform large scale multicenter study. Through this study investigators evaluate that driving pressure-guided ventilation can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared with conventional protective ventilation in thoracic surgery.
The aim of this questionnaire-based survey is to evaluate the routine use of individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARM) of Central and Eastern European anaesthesiologists during general anaesthesia.
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is sometimes used during perioperative period, as it has favourable effects on lung mechanics. Unfortunately, it has some negative effects on the patients, like increased intraabdominal, intrathoracic, intracranial and intraocular pressures. In this study the investigators aimed to investigate the effects of different PEEP levels on the patients' intraocular and intracranial pressures. Intraocular pressure will be measured by ocular tonometry, and intracranial pressure will be estimated by optic nerve sheath diameter measurement. The measurements will be performed in the operating room in the patients undergoing laparotomic surgery.
Protective ventilation strategy has been widely applied in the field of thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. Low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and intermittent recruitment maneuver are key components of protective ventilation strategy. Recent evidence suggests that a tidal volume of 4-5 ml/kg should be applied during protective one-lung ventilation. However, optimal level of PEEP is still unclear. This study aims to investigate optimal level of PEEP to minimize postoperative atelectasis by comparing modified lung ultrasound score in patients applied protective one-lung ventilation using PEEP of 3, 6, or 9 cm of water during thoracic surgery.
This study investigates airway effects of PEEP during maskventilation at anesthesia induction. Four patient groups will be ventilated with different PEEP and driving pressures to evaluate time to open airway after start of positive pressure maskventilation during anesthesia induction.
In patients with obstructive lung disease like asthma aerosol therapy is the most used for drug administration. A order to make better use of aerosolized drugs in asthmatic patients, studies focus on ways to optimize this administration. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of nebulized bronchodilators carried by heliox associated with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) in lung deposition of radiation activity in adult asthmatic patients between episodes and its impact on lung function. Methods: A randomized controlled trial involving 32 with a mean age of 47.28 ± 9.67 of which 25% of the sample are male, these patients were divided into four groups: heliox + PEP, + PEP oxygen, heliox and oxygen in Regarding the anthropometric characteristics, parameters and cardiopulmonary baseline spirometry data were similar for all groups. For inhalation lung scintigraphy was used a noninvasive delivery system - orofacial mask with two unidirectional valves nontoxic - inspiratory and expiratory branch - connected to the nebulizer for radioisotopes associated with PEP of 10 cm H2O. At the end of inhalation, the images were acquired in a scintillation camera at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. In order to analyze the aerosol deposition in different lung areas were delineated regions of interest (ROIs) in the vertical - the upper, middle and bottom - and horizontal central, intermediate and peripheral. Results: The spirometric data showed an increase in the values of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) predicted when compared with the heliox group + PEP (80%, p = 0.030) with PEP + O2 (65%, p = 0.030). As for CI, there was also an increase in PEP + heliox group (0.05 L, p = 0.012) compared to groups without oxygen and heliox PEP (0.03 L, 0.03 L, p = 0.012 respectively) for the total number of counts, no differences were seen between groups with heliox and oxygen with PEP PEP (482510, 577598, p = 0.262 respectively) for the total number of counts by comparing the oxygen group + PEP (577,598) with the heliox group (332,951, p = 0.004) and oxygen without PEP (409,526, p = 0.045), there was a greater number of counts in the O2 + PEP group. By analyzing the rate of pulmonary deposition (IDP) in the vertical gradient, higher deposition in the middle third (p = 0.001) when compared to upper and lower in both groups. With regard to IDPs in the horizontal gradient, there was greater deposition in the intermediate region when compared to central and peripheral (p = 0.003, 0.001 respectively) in all groups. As the penetration rate, no significant differences between groups (p = 0.726). When considering the pulmonary clearance, decreased with the number of counts over time within groups (p <0.05) but no differences between them: heliox + PEP (20.67%), PEP + oxygen (13.50%), heliox (16.27%) and oxygen (16%) - (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Although no differences in the rate of penetration and clearance of pulmonary radiation activity between groups, we noted a higher number of counts in patients who underwent nebulization with oxygen associated with PEP and a functional improvement in patients who underwent nebulization with PEP as spirometric values and CI.