Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06095115
Other study ID # 77242113PSO3001
Secondary ID 77242113PSO30012
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date October 12, 2023
Est. completion date April 6, 2027

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is see how effective is JNJ-77242113 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 684
Est. completion date April 6, 2027
Est. primary completion date November 19, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, for at least 26 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention - Total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline - Total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline - Total investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline - Candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis - A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Week 0 prior to administration of study intervention Exclusion Criteria: - Nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) - Current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium) - A current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, liver, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances - Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to JNJ-77242113 or its excipients - Major surgical procedures, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) within 8 weeks before screening, or will not have fully recovered from a surgical procedure or has a surgical procedure planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
JNJ-77242113
JNJ-77242113 will be administered orally.
Placebo
Placebo will be administered orally

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Centro Privado de Medicina Familiar Buenos Aires
Argentina CINME Metabolic Research Center Buenos Aires
Argentina Psoriahue Caba
Argentina ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
Argentina Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Mar Del Plata Mar Del Plata
Argentina Instituto De Especialidades De La Salud SRL Rosario
Argentina MR Medicina Reumatologica San Fernando Buenos Aires
Australia Dr Rodney Sinclair Pty Ltd East Melbourne
Australia The Alfred Hospital Melbourne
Australia Kingsway Dermatology & Aesthetics Miranda
Australia ISHI dermatology Mitcham
Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville
Australia Veracity Clinical Research Woolloongabba
Canada Dermatology Research Institute Inc. Calgary Alberta
Canada Rejuvenation Dermatology Clinic Edmonton Downtown Edmonton Alberta
Canada Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation London Ontario
Canada Mediprobe Research Inc. London Ontario
Canada Innovaderm Research Inc. Montreal Quebec
Canada Dr. Sk Siddha Medicine Professional Corporation Newmarket Ontario
Canada Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Surrey British Columbia
Canada Canadian Dermatology Center Toronto Ontario
Canada FACET Dermatology Toronto Ontario
Canada Toronto Research Centre Toronto Ontario
Canada XLR8 Medical Research Windsor Ontario
China Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing
China China-Japan Friendship Hospital Beijing
China Peking University Third Hospital Beijing
China The Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College Bengbu
China Hosp. of Chengde Medical University Cheng De Shi
China Chengdu Second People's Hospital Chengdu
China The First Hospital of Jiaxing Jiaxing
China Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan
China Nanyang First People's Hospital Nan Yang Shi
China Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province NanChang
China Shanghai skin disease hospital Shanghai
China Northeast International Hospital Shen Yang
China Union Hospital Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan
China The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an
China Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang
France Hopital Prive d'Antony Antony
France Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy Argenteuil
Germany Fachklinik Bad Bentheim Bad Bentheim
Germany Charite - Campus Mitte Berlin
Germany Universitatsklinikum Bonn Bonn
Germany Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH Dresden
Germany Hautzentrum Dulmen Dulmen
Germany Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner Dusseldorf
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg Freiburg
Germany Derma-Study-Center Friedrichshafen GmbH Friedrichshafen
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg
Germany Hautarztpraxis Mahlow
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Muenster Muenster
Germany Klinikum Oldenburg Oldenburg
Germany Hautarztpraxis Mortazawi Remscheid
Germany Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen Tubingen
Germany Hautarztpraxis Witten
Germany CentroDerm GmbH Wuppertal
Hungary Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Borgyogyaszati Klinika
Hungary Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft Budapest
Hungary Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont Debrecen
Hungary Derma-B Kft Debrecen
Hungary Somogy Varmegyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz Kaposvar
Hungary SZTE AOK Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, Borgyogyaszati és Allergologiai Klinika Szeged
Hungary Allergo-Derm Bakos Kft. Szolnok
Hungary Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt. Veszprem
Italy Azienda Di Rilievo Nazionale E Di Alta Specializzazione Palermo
Italy Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma Parma
Italy Policlinico Tor Vergata Roma
Italy Istituto Clinico Humanitas Rozzano
Japan Teikyo University Hospital Itabashi Ku
Japan Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health Kitakyushu-shi
Japan Mito Kyodo General Hospital Mito
Japan Nagoya City University Hospital Nagoya
Japan Kindai University Hospital Osaka Sayama shi
Japan Tohoku University Hospital Sendai
Japan Tokyo Medical University Hospital Shinjuku
Japan Mie University Hospital Tsu
Korea, Republic of Korea University Ansan Hospital Ansan-si
Korea, Republic of Chosun university hospital Gwangju
Korea, Republic of CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Asan Medical Center Seoul
Poland Osteo-Medic s.c A. Racewicz, J Supronik Bialystok
Poland Specderm Poznanska sp j Bialystok
Poland Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze J. Brzezicki, B. Gornikiewicz-Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska Elblag
Poland Centrum Medyczne Promed Krakow
Poland Lidia Rajzer - Specjalistyczny Gabinet Dermatologiczno-Kosmetyczny Krakow
Poland Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna Krakow
Poland Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna Lodz
Poland Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp z o o Lodz
Poland DermoDent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafal Czajkowski s.c. Osielsko
Poland Clinical Research Center sp z o o MEDIC R s k Poznan
Poland SOLUMED Centrum Medyczne Poznan
Poland Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia Warszawa
Poland Przychodnia Specjalistyczna High Med Warszawa
Poland Centrum Medyczne Oporow Wroclaw
Poland DERMMEDICA Sp.z o.o. Wroclaw
Poland WroMedica I.Bielicka, A.Strzalkowska s.c. Wroclaw
Spain Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon Alcorcon
Spain Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis Alicante
Spain Hosp. Clinic de Barcelona Barcelona
Spain Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau Barcelona
Spain Hosp. Univ. de Basurto Bilbao
Spain Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen Madrid
Spain Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon Madrid
Spain Hosp. Univ. Son Espases Palma de Mallorca
Spain Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago Santiago de Compostela
Spain Hosp. Virgen Macarena Sevilla
Spain Hosp. de Manises Valencia
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch Hsin Chu
Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung
Taiwan Mackay Memorial Hospital Taipei
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei
Taiwan Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei
Taiwan Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taoyuan
Turkey Gazi University Medical Faculty Ankara
Turkey Hacettepe University Medical Faculty Ankara
Turkey Erciyes University Medical Faculty Kayseri
Turkey Ondokuz Mayis University Samsun
United Kingdom London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust Harrow
United Kingdom Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London
United Kingdom Royal Berkshire Hospital Reading
United Kingdom Salford Royal Hospital Salford
United States Arlington Research Center, Inc. Arlington Texas
United States Oakview Dermatology Athens Ohio
United States The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Bellaire Texas
United States Allcutis Research Beverly Massachusetts
United States Optima Research Boardman Ohio
United States Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina
United States Michigan Center of Medical Research Clarkston Michigan
United States Windsor Dermatology East Windsor New Jersey
United States The Pennsylvania Centre for Dermatology, LLC Exton Pennsylvania
United States Wright State Physicians Health Center Fairborn Ohio
United States Johnson Dermatology Fort Smith Arkansas
United States First OC Dermatology Fountain Valley California
United States Center for Dermatology Clinical Research Fremont California
United States Center for Clinical Studies Houston Texas
United States Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC Indianapolis Indiana
United States Dermatology and Advanced Aesthetics Lake Charles Louisiana
United States Skin Care Physicians of Georgia Macon Georgia
United States Bioclinical Research Alliance Inc. Miami Florida
United States Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC Mill Creek Washington
United States Minnesota Clinical Study Center New Brighton Minnesota
United States Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai New York New York
United States Virginia Dermatology Skin Cancer Center Pllc Norfolk Virginia
United States Ziaderm Research, LLC North Miami Beach Florida
United States Central Sooner Research Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Skin Specialists Omaha Nebraska
United States Qualmedica Research Owensboro Kentucky
United States Medical Dermatology Specialists Phoenix Arizona
United States University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Indiana Clinical Trial Center Plainfield Indiana
United States Oregon Dermatology and Research Center Portland Oregon
United States Oregon Medical Research Center Portland Oregon
United States Allcutis Research Portsmouth New Hampshire
United States Health Concepts Rapid City South Dakota
United States Arlington Dermatology Rolling Meadows Illinois
United States Integrative Skin Science and Research Sacramento California
United States Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists San Antonio Texas
United States Rady Childrens Hospital San Diego San Diego California
United States Southern California Dermatology Santa Ana California
United States Clinical Science Institute Santa Monica California
United States Northshore Medical Group Skokie Illinois
United States Premier Clinical Research Spokane Washington
United States Springville Dermatology CCT Research Springville Utah
United States Forcare Clinical Research Inc Tampa Florida
United States Center for Clinical Studies Webster Texas
United States Dundee Dermatology West Dundee Illinois
United States Wilmington Dermatology Center Wilmington North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Argentina,  Australia,  Canada,  China,  France,  Germany,  Hungary,  Italy,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Poland,  Spain,  Taiwan,  Turkey,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and Greater Than or Equal to (>= )2-Grade Improvement From Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 or 1 and >=2-grade improvement from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Baseline to Week 16
Primary Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 at Week 16 Percentage of participants who achieve an IGA score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Weeks 4 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 75 response (>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Weeks 4 and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 8 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 90 response (>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 8 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 8
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (>=100% improvement in PASI) at Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Scalp-specific Investigator Global Assessment (ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Grade Improvement Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 and >=2 grade improvement baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: absence of disease (0), very mild disease (1), mild disease (2), moderate disease (3), and severe disease (4). Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptom Score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving PSSD symptom score of 0 at Weeks 8 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Weeks 8 and 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving >=4-Point Improvement From Baseline in PSSD Itch Score to Weeks 4 and 16 Percentage of participants achieving >=4-Point improvement from baseline in PSSD itch score to Weeks 4 and 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Weeks 4 and 16
Secondary Time to Loss of PASI 75 Time to loss of PASI 75 will be reported. Loss of PASI 75 response is defined as <75% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=75% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 75 response represents at least a 75% improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Week 24 up to Week 52
Secondary Time to Loss of PASI 90 Time to loss of PASI 90 will be reported. Loss of PASI 90 response is defined as <90% improvement in PASI from Week 24 up to Week 52 in an adult participant who had achieved >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline at Week 24. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents at least a 90% improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Week 24 up to Week 52
Secondary Number of Participants with Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention under study. Treatment-emergent AEs are defined as AEs with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment. Up to 160 weeks
Secondary Number of Participants with Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent SAEs are defined as serious events between administration of study drug and after the last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsen relative to pretreatment state. Up to 160 weeks
Secondary Change from Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16 Change from baseline in BSA to Week 16 will be reported. BSA is a commonly used measure of extent of skin disease. It is defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed (that is, plaque psoriasis). Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Change from Baseline in PASI Total Score to Week 16 Change from baseline in PASI total score to Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percent Improvement in PASI Score From Baseline to Week 16 Percent improvement in PASI score from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving a Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement in Genital Psoriasis From Baseline to Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving a sPGA-G Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement in genital psoriasis from baseline to Week 16 will be reported. The sPGA-G is a 6-point scale to assess the severity of genital psoriasis at a given time point. The sPGA-G evaluates erythema, plaque elevation, and scale of genital psoriatic lesions. The severity of genital psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), and very severe (5). Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving a Physician's Global Assessment of Hands and Feet (hf-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving a hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-grade improvement at Week 16 will be reported. The hf-PGA assesses the severity of hand and foot psoriasis using a 5-point scale to score the plaques on the hands and feet as: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4). Week 16
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 16 Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score at Week 16 will be reported. The mNAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. Each of the participant's 10 fingernails are evaluated for 7 features. The first3 features are each scored from 0 to 3 in severity and are (1) onycholysis and oil-drop dyschromia, (2) pitting, and (3) nail plate crumbling. The next 4 features are scored 0 - absent or 1 - present and are (1) leukonychia, (2) splinter hemorrhages, (3) nail bed hyperkeratosis, and (4) red spots in the lunula. The score ranges from 0 to 13 per nail and 0 to 130 for all fingernails. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percent of Participants Achieving Fingernail Physician's Global Assessment (f-PGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Percent of participants achieving f-PGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The f-PGA is used to evaluate the current status of a participant's fingernail psoriasis on a scale of 0 to 4 (clear [0], minimal [1], mild [2], moderate [3], or severe [4]). At Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score to Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSD symptom score to Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in PSSD Sign Score to Week 16 Change from baseline in PSSD sign score to Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSD Sign Score of 0 at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving PSSD sign score of 0 at Week 16 will be reported. The PSSD includes PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs over the previous 7 days for the assessment of treatment benefit. The PSSD is a self-administered PRO instrument that includes 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning, and skin tightness) and patient-observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness, and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Two sub scores will be derived each ranging from 0 to 100: the psoriasis symptom score and the psoriasis sign score. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Genital Psoriasis Sexual Frequency Questionnaire (GenPs-SFQ) Item 2 Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving GenPs-SFQ Item 2 score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The GenPs-SFQ is a 2-item participant-reported instrument used to assess the impact of genital psoriasis on the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days. Item 1 assesses overall frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (none/zero, once, or 2 or more times), and item 2 assesses how frequently genital psoriasis symptoms have limited the frequency of sexual activity in the last 7 days (never [0], rarely [1], sometimes [2], often [3], or always [4]). Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving DLQI score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Total DLQI Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 will be reported. The DLQI is a dermatology specific HRQoL instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Change from Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in domain scores of the PROMIS-29 score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-29 is a 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assessing each of the 7 PROMIS domains(depression, anxiety, physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions for each domain. The questions are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale. There is also a numerical rating scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst pain imaginable) for pain intensity. The raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference indicate more severe symptoms. Higher scores on physical function and social participation indicate better health outcomes. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Percentage of participants achieving CDLQI score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will be reported. The CDLQI is an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and will be utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The adaption and validation of the CDLQI was undertaken by the original developer of the DLQI to ensure it addressed the specific needs of the pediatric population. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Higher scores indicate greater impact on HRQoL. The instrument is designed for use in children is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who is asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in CDLQI at Week 16 Change from baseline in CDLQI at Week 16 will be reported. The CDLQI is an adapted version of the DLQI for the pediatric population and will be utilized in the adolescent population in this study. The adaption and validation of the CDLQI was undertaken by the original developer of the DLQI to ensure it addressed the specific needs of the pediatric population. The CDLQI is a 10-item instrument that has 4 item response options and a recall period of 1 week. Higher scores indicate greater impact on HRQoL. The instrument is designed for use in children is self-explanatory and can be simply handed to the participant who is asked to fill it in with the help of the child's parent or caregiver. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Domain Scores of the PROMIS-25 Pediatric Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in the domain scores of the PROMIS-25 pediatric score at Week 16 will be reported. The PROMIS-25 will be utilized in the adolescent population and is a 25-item generic HRQoL survey. Six PROMIS domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference) are each assessed with 4 questions. There is also one 11-point rating scale for pain intensity. The instrument is designed for use in ages 8-17 years of age and can be self-administered. Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 at Week 52 Percentage of participants achieving IGA score of 0 at Week 52 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Week 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Response at Week 52 Percentage of participants achieving PASI 100 response (100% improvement in PASI) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Week 52
Secondary Time to Loss of IGA 0 to 1 Response Time to loss of IGA 0 to 1 response will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Week 24 to Week 52
Secondary Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving IGA Score of 0 or 1 and >=2 Improvement From Baseline to Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 and IGA score >=2 from baseline to Week 52 will be reported. The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Baseline to Week 52
Secondary Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving PASI 75 Response at Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving PASI 75 response (>=75% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 52
Secondary Percentage of Adolescent Participants Achieving PASI 90 Response at Week 52 Percentage of adolescent participants achieving PASI 90 response (>=90% improvement in PASI from baseline) at Week 52 will be reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 and extent of involvement on a scale of 0 to 6. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Baseline to Week 52
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01194219 - Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06030076 - A Study to Assess the Effects of Switching From a Biologic Treatment to Tildrakizumab Using Patient-reported Outcomes in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Completed NCT04263610 - Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Who Are Non-Responders to Dimethyl Fumarate Therapy Phase 4
Completed NCT02601469 - Study to Assess the Potential for Adrenal Suppression Following Treatment With DSXS in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT05600036 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ESK-001 in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT05375955 - A Study to Learn About The Study Medicine (PF-07038124) In Patients With Mild To Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Or Mild To Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Phase 2
Completed NCT03614078 - A Study of PRCL-02 in Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05036889 - A 16-week Randomized Evaluation of the Impact of Mind.Px Application on Response to Biologic Treatment in Patients Suffering From Plaque Psoriasis Through Clinical Utility and Health Outcomes. N/A
Completed NCT04603027 - A Phase 2 Study Investigating the Effect of EDP1815 in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT03638258 - The Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of ARQ-151 Cream in Subjects With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Completed NCT02881346 - Efficacy and Tolerability of Enstilar® in Daily Practice
Recruiting NCT02611349 - Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of IDP-118 Lotion in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Completed NCT02251678 - Evaluate the Effect of Elimune Capsules Phase 1
Completed NCT01987843 - Dose-finding Study of MT-1303 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Terminated NCT01708629 - Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo and Ustekinumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Phase 3
Completed NCT01230138 - Pivotal Efficacy and Safety Registration Trial of FP187 in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00747032 - To Demonstrate the Superior Efficacy of NYC 0462 Ointment Over That of the Placebo in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis Phase 3
Completed NCT00581100 - Effects of Etanercept on Nail Psoriasis and Plaque Psoriasis Phase 4
Suspended NCT01228656 - Effectiveness of Association Mometasone Furoate 0.1% and Salicylic Acid 5% Compared With Mometasone Furoate Phase 2
Completed NCT00540618 - A Phase II Study of MEDI-507, Administered by Injection to Adults With Psoriasis Phase 2