View clinical trials related to Pituitary Neoplasms.
Filter by:Pituitary adenomas are one of the most common primary central nervous system tumors and have an estimated prevalence of 17%. Management of pituitary adenomas involves a multidisciplinary approach that can incorporate surgical, medical, and/or radiation therapies. Over the last two decades, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been extensively developed and refined for the resection of pituitary adenomas (PAs). In recent years, extracapsular resection (ER), which emphasized the importance of the pseudocapsule between the adenoma and surrounding normal gland tissue as a surgical plane, was adopted for more radical resection of the tumor. Therefore, dedicated high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols have been proposed to detect pituitary adenoma and accurately guide surgical removal. The evaluation of preoperative imaging for pseudocapsule is very important to the surgical method. Depending on different tumor sizes and pseudocapsule development, investigators adopted different resection strategies. To accomplish complete PA removal and minimize the impact on pituitary functions, intraoperative navigation was used to identify the tumor pseudocapsule, also the suspicious tissue was sent to the pathology department for histopathology intraoperatively. Long-term postoperative follow-up imaging and endocrine data were used to evaluate tumor prognosis. Standardized management and established biobank is critical for pituitary adenomas.
The surgical treatment strategy for giant invasive pituitary adenoma is one of the current hot spots in the field of clinical research on pituitary adenoma. A comprehensive literature search resulted in numerous previous studies to investigate the efficacy, advantages and disadvantages of different surgical options. A single approach (transnasal or craniotomy) is theoretically less invasive and has a shorter hospital stay for the patient, but may result in postoperative bleeding due to residual tumor and damage to the intracranial vessels adhering to the tumor. The advantage of the combined approach is that the tumor can be removed to the greatest extent possible. In addition, postoperative suprasellar hemorrhage can be prevented by careful hemostasis or intracranial drainage by the transcranial team if necessary. In this way, the risk of postoperative bleeding due to residual tumor can be significantly reduced. In some cases, waiting a few months after the initial surgery for a second-stage procedure may also be an option when the patient's condition does not allow for a combined access procedure, when the tumor is hard, or when the blood preparation is insufficient. However, staged surgery increases the financial burden on the patient, and local scar formation may make second-stage surgery more difficult and decrease the likelihood of endocrine remission of functional pituitary tumors. Given the complexity of the treatment of giant invasive pituitary adenoma, there is a need to conduct studies comparing the combined transnasal cranial approach, the single access transnasal or cranial approach, and the staged approach simultaneously to assess whether the combined transnasal cranial approach is superior to the single access transnasal or cranial approach or the staged approach in improving the tumor resection rate in giant invasive pituitary adenoma.
The study will evaluate the efficacy of bilateral infraorbital nerve block versus preoperative nasal packing with long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine in term of maintaining hemodynamics intraoperative within 20% below baseline to achieve adequate hypotensive anesthesia and longer duration of postoperative analgesia up to 24 hours in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection.
The registry of this study was subjected to patients who were radiologically diagnosed with a non-malignant brain tumor at Seoul National University Hospital since 2001, and who have had magnetic resonance (MR) re-examination after first MR exam or will be re-examined because it was determined that immediate treatment would not be needed at the first visit to the hospital. In all MRs taken by patients, the date of imaging and the volume of the tumor are measured, and we aim to establish a natural growth history for non-malignant brain tumors.
At present there are no recommendations regarding the possibility of discontinuing treatment in cases of recurrent acromegaly with good hormonal control. Discontinuation of treatment is therefore most often decided by the practitioner, on the basis of his experience and knowledge of the patient, the long-term course with somatostatin analogues being very little described. Thus, although hormonal control is achieved in a majority of cases under medical treatment, we do not know if it is possible to stop treatment and in this case how the pathology evolves. It would appear that approximately 40% of patients defined as very good responders to somatostatin analogues may gradually space their injections.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the CONVIVO confocal endomicroscope in discriminating between normal and abnormal tissue in vivo during brain tumor surgery. The interpretation of intraoperative images obtained in situ will be tested against conventional histologic evaluation of targeted biopsies from imaged tissue. The study team hypothesize that there will be a high degree of correlation between images obtained with the CONVIVO system and conventional histologic interpretation.
Refractory pituitary adenoma is characterized by invasive tumor growth, continuous growth and/or hormone hypersecretion in spite of standardized multi-modal treatment such as surgeries, medications or radiations. Quality of life or even lives are threatened by these tumors. According to the 2017 World Health Organization's new classification guideline of pituitary adenoma, patients have to suffer from symptoms or complications caused by these tumors, to bear a heavy financial burden, and to accept additional therapeutic side effects when the diagnosis of "refractory pituitary adenoma" is made. If refractory pituitary adenoma could be predicted at early stage, these patients would be able to have a more frequent clinical follow-up, receive multiple effective treatment as early as possible, or even be enrolled in clinical trials of investigational medications, so as to prevent or delay the recurrence or persistent of the tumor growth. Therefore, the unmet clinical need falls into an early prediction system for refractory pituitary adenomas, which could provide accurate guidance for subsequent treatment in the early stage. The investigators have constructed a pituitary adenoma database including clinical data, radiological images, pathological images and genetic information. The investigators are proposing a study using machine learning to extract features from these multi-dimensional, multi-omics data, which could be further used to train a prediction model for the risk of refractory pituitary adenoma. The proposed model would also be validated in another prospectively collected database. The established model would be able to identify potential medication targets and provide guidance for personalized therapy of refractory pituitary adenoma.
To conduct a retrospective multicenter cohort study to define benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas.
The investigators hypothesize that withholding hydrocortisone during the peri-operation in patients with pituitary adenomas whose hypothalamus pituitary adrenal axis are intact are safe.
We hypothesize that the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) for pain relief among patients with pituitary adenomas undergoing transnasal transsphenoidal surgeries are non-inferior to tramadol. We aim to launch a single-center randomized clinical trial to verify this hypothesis.